The risk-based breast screening (RIBBS) study protocol: a personalized screening model for young women

被引:2
|
作者
Gennaro, Gisella [1 ]
Bucchi, Lauro [2 ]
Ravaioli, Alessandra [2 ]
Zorzi, Manuel [3 ]
Falcini, Fabio [2 ,4 ]
Russo, Francesca [5 ]
Caumo, Francesca [1 ]
机构
[1] Veneto Inst Oncol IOV IRCCS, Padua, Italy
[2] IRCCS Ist Romagnolo Studio Tumori IRST Dino Amador, Romagna Canc Inst, Emilia Romagna Canc Registry, Meldola, Forli, Italy
[3] Azienda Zero, SER Serv Epidemiol Reg & Registri, Padua, Italy
[4] Local Hlth Author, Canc Prevent Unit, Forli, Italy
[5] Direz Prevenz Sicurezza Alimentare Vet, Reg Veneto, Venice, Italy
来源
RADIOLOGIA MEDICA | 2024年 / 129卷 / 05期
关键词
Breast cancer; Cancer screening; Breast density; Risk assessment; Digital Breast Tomosynthesis; PRECISION MEDICINE; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; CANCER; PROGRAM; DENSITY; STAGE; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; INTERVAL;
D O I
10.1007/s11547-024-01797-9
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The optimal mammography screening strategy for women aged 45-49 years is a matter of debate. We present the RIBBS study protocol, a quasi-experimental, prospective, population-based study comparing a risk- and breast density-stratified screening model (interventional cohort) with annual digital mammography (DM) screening (observational control cohort) in a real-world setting. The interventional cohort consists of 10,269 women aged 45 years enrolled between 2020 and 2021 from two provinces of the Veneto Region (northen Italy). At baseline, participants underwent two-view digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and completed the Tyrer-Cuzick risk prediction model. Volumetric breast density (VBD) was calculated from DBT and the lifetime risk (LTR) was estimated by including VBD among the risk factors. Based on VBD and LTR, women were classified into five subgroups with specific screening protocols for subsequent screening rounds: (1) LTR <= 17% and nondense breast: biennial DBT; (2) LTR <= 17% and dense breast: biennial DBT and ultrasound; (3) LTR 17-30% or LTR > 30% without family history of BC, and nondense breast: annual DBT; (4) LTR 17-30% or > 30% without family history of BC, and dense breast: annual DBT and ultrasound; and (5) LTR > 30% and family history of BC: annual DBT and breast MRI. The interventional cohort is still ongoing. An observational, nonequivalent control cohort of 43,000 women aged 45 years participating in an annual DM screening programme was recruited in three provinces of the neighbouring Emilia-Romagna Region. Cumulative incidence rates of advanced BC at three, five, and ten years between the two cohorts will be compared, adjusting for the incidence difference at baseline.
引用
收藏
页码:727 / 736
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Breast cancer screening in young women
    Nature Clinical Practice Oncology, 2005, 2 (7): : 329 - 329
  • [42] Breast cancer screening in young women
    Desreux, Joelle A. C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2018, 230 : 208 - 211
  • [43] Optimizing risk-based breast cancer screening policies with reinforcement learning
    Yala, Adam
    Mikhael, Peter G.
    Lehman, Constance
    Lin, Gigin G.
    Strand, Fredrik
    Wan, Yung-Liang
    Hughes, Kevin
    Satuluru, Siddharth
    Kim, Thomas
    Banerjee, Imon
    Gichoya, Judy
    Trivedi, Hari
    Barzilay, Regina
    NATURE MEDICINE, 2022, 28 (01) : 136 - +
  • [44] Estimating the Breast Cancer Burden in Germany and Implications for Risk-based Screening
    Quante, Anne S.
    Huesing, Anika
    Chang-Claude, Jenny
    Kiechle, Marion
    Kaaks, Rudolf
    Pfeiffer, Ruth M.
    CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH, 2021, 14 (06) : 627 - 633
  • [45] Optimizing risk-based breast cancer screening policies with reinforcement learning
    Adam Yala
    Peter G. Mikhael
    Constance Lehman
    Gigin Lin
    Fredrik Strand
    Yung-Liang Wan
    Kevin Hughes
    Siddharth Satuluru
    Thomas Kim
    Imon Banerjee
    Judy Gichoya
    Hari Trivedi
    Regina Barzilay
    Nature Medicine, 2022, 28 : 136 - 143
  • [46] Women's perspectives on the acceptability of risk-based cervical cancer screening
    Remmel, Maali-Liina
    Suija, Kadri
    Raudne, Riina
    Tisler, Anna
    Kivite-Urtane, Anda
    Stankunas, Mindaugas
    Nygard, Mari
    Aasbo, Gunvor
    Malina, Laura
    Uuskula, Anneli
    BMC CANCER, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [47] Women's perceptions on personalised risk-based breast cancer screening and primary prevention: A systematic review
    Rainey, L.
    Jervaeus, A.
    van der Waal, D.
    Wengstroem, Y.
    Broeders, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 57 : S25 - S25
  • [48] Breast Cancer Risk Prediction in Korean Women: Review and Perspectives on Personalized Breast Cancer Screening
    Kim, Do Yeun
    Park, Hannah Lui
    JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2020, 23 (04) : 331 - 342
  • [49] Got patient advocates? The value of patient advocate participation in a large research study to develop personalized risk-based breast cancer screening strategies
    Branch, Vernal
    Achenbach, Carolyn
    Ross, Kathleen G.
    Cohn, Wendy F.
    Yaffe, Martin D.
    Knaus, William A.
    Harvey, Jennifer A.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 75
  • [50] Breast Cancer Screening in an Era of Personalized Regimens A Conceptual Model and National Cancer Institute Initiative for Risk-Based and Preference-Based Approaches at a Population Level
    Onega, Tracy
    Beaber, Elisabeth F.
    Sprague, Brian L.
    Barlow, William E.
    Haas, Jennifer S.
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    Schnall, Mitchell D.
    Armstrong, Katrina
    Schapira, Marilyn M.
    Geller, Berta
    Weaver, Donald L.
    Conant, Emily F.
    CANCER, 2014, 120 (19) : 2955 - 2964