Tolerability and blinding of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation among older adults at intensities of up to 4 mA per electrode

被引:6
|
作者
El Jamal, Carine
Harrie, Ashley [1 ]
Rahman-Filipiak, Annalise [1 ]
Iordan, Alexandru D. [1 ]
Dasilva, Alexandre F. [2 ]
Ploutz-Snyder, Robert [3 ]
Khadr, Lara [3 ]
Vesia, Michael [4 ]
Bikson, Marom [5 ]
Hampstead, Benjamin M. [1 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Psychiat, Res Program Cognit & Neuromodulat Based Intervent, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Headache & Orofacial Pain Effort HOPE, Biol & Mat Sci, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Nursing, Appl Biostat Lab, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Sch Kinesiol, Brain Behav Lab, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[5] CUNY, City Coll New York, Dept Biomed Engn, New York, NY 10031 USA
[6] VA Ann Arbor Healthcare Syst, Mental Hlth Serv, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[7] Suite 2400,Bldg 1,4251 Plymouth Rd, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
HD-tDCS; Tolerability; Safety; Sham; Blind; Double-blind; MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; ADVERSE EVENTS; TDCS; MEMORY; CONNECTIVITY; BURN;
D O I
10.1016/j.brs.2023.08.025
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Few studies have investigated tolerability, blinding, and double-blinding of High-Definition trans cranial Direct Current Stimulation (HD-tDCS) at amplitudes above 2 milliamps (mA). Objective: We examined a) tolerability of HD-tDCS during stimulation sessions and b) blinding and double blinding of participants and study team members.Methods: Data from a mixed neurologic sample of 292 older adults were pooled from 3046 HD-tDCS sessions (2329 active; 717 sham). Per electrode amplitudes ranged from 1 mA to 4 mA with total currents up to 10 mA. Participants completed a standardized sensation (tolerability) questionnaire after each session. Participants and study team members stated whether the participant received active or sham stimulation at the end of various sessions. Data were collapsed into the presence/absence of a symptom due to low rates of positive responding and were analyzed for both differences and bioequivalency.Results: There were no safety-related adverse events. HD-tDCS was well tolerated with mostly no ("none") or "mild" sensations reported across sessions, regardless of active or sham condition and in both stimulation naive and experienced participants. There were no significant differences in side effects between active and sham, with some achieving bioequivalence. Tingling and itching were significantly more common after lower (<2 mA) than higher (>= 3 mA) amplitude active sessions, while skin redness was significantly more common after higher amplitudes. Blinding was effective at the participant and study team levels.Conclusions: HD-tDCS was well tolerated with center electrode amplitudes up to 4 mA. The bimodal ramp-up/ down format of the sham was effective for blinding. These results support higher scalp-based amplitudes that enable greater brain-based current intensities in older adults.
引用
收藏
页码:1328 / 1335
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sex Mediates the Effects of High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on "Mind-Reading"
    Martin, A. K.
    Huang, J.
    Hunold, A.
    Meinzer, M.
    NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 366 : 84 - 94
  • [32] On the Use of the Terms Anodal and Cathodal in High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Technical Note
    Garnett, Emily O.
    Malyutina, Svetlana
    Datta, Abhishek
    den Ouden, Dirk-Bart
    NEUROMODULATION, 2015, 18 (08): : 705 - 712
  • [33] Adjuvant High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia A Pilot Study
    Dharani, Ramamoorthy
    Goyal, Nishant
    Mukherjee, Aniruddha
    Umesh, Shreekantiah
    JOURNAL OF ECT, 2021, 37 (03) : 195 - 201
  • [34] Effects of High-Definition and Conventional Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation on Motor Learning in Children
    Cole, Lauran
    Giuffre, Adrianna
    Ciechanski, Patrick
    Carlson, Helen L.
    Zewdie, Ephrem
    Kuo, Hsing-Ching
    Kirton, Adam
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 12
  • [35] Survey of tinnitus patients' acceptance of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation as a management option
    Kok, Tori Elyssa
    Varley, Rosemary
    Shekhawat, Giriraj Singh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2022, 61 (06) : 507 - 514
  • [36] The polarity of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation affects the planning and execution of movement sequences
    Son, Jake J.
    Erker, Tara D.
    Ward, Thomas W.
    Arif, Yasra
    Huang, Peihan J.
    John, Jason A.
    Mcdonald, Kellen M.
    Petro, Nathan M.
    Garrison, Grant M.
    Okelberry, Hannah J.
    Kress, Kennedy A.
    Picci, Giorgia
    Heinrichs-Graham, Elizabeth
    Wilson, Tony W.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2025, 306
  • [37] Stimulation Location Determination using a 3D Digitizer with High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
    Chen, Wanting
    Chen, Rui
    He, Qinghua
    JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2019, (154):
  • [38] Effects of High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Theta Burst Stimulation for Modulating the Posterior Parietal Cortex
    Gan, Tian
    Nikolin, Stevan
    Loo, Colleen K.
    Martin, Donel M.
    JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 25 (09) : 972 - 984
  • [39] Effect of High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Conditioned Pain Modulation in Healthy Adults: A Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial
    Wan, Ruihan
    Wang, Yafei
    Feng, Beibei
    Jiang, Xue
    Xu, Yangfan
    Zhang, Ziping
    Liu, Ying
    Wang, Yuling
    NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 479 : 60 - 69
  • [40] High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improves Verb Recovery in Aphasic Patients Depending on Current Intensity
    Fiori, Valentina
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    Cucuzza, Gabriella
    Caltagirone, Carlo
    Marangolo, Paola
    NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 406 : 159 - 166