Exploring the use of focused ethnography in social work research: A scoping review

被引:4
|
作者
Shannon, Patricia J. [1 ]
Soltani, Laura [1 ]
Sugrue, Erin [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Sch Social Work, 1404 Gortner Ave, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[2] Augsburg Univ, Sch Social Work, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
Culture; rigor; evaluation; ethnography; focused ethnography; scoping review; FAMILY COURT; CARE;
D O I
10.1177/14733250231214199
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Focused ethnography (FE) is an emerging method for social work researchers who examine social justice issues within specific sub-cultures and service systems. FE methods may include researchers with background knowledge, specific research questions, and the use of intensive, short-term data collection methods in time-limited settings. Although relevant to applied studies in social work, FE methods remain underspecified. This scoping review examines the extent, variety, and characteristics of FE in social work research. The protocol follows the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews Checklist and Explanation (PRISMA-ScR). We searched Social Science databases between 2018 and 2022. The critical appraisal of articles is guided by published FE methodology and American Psychological Association (APA) journal reporting standards for qualitative research. Researchers justified the use of FE in relation to their ethnographic goals, research populations, and specific questions. However, they were inconsistent in their discussion of the integration of theory and reflexive processes in research methods. While most studies used thematic analysis or coding of qualitative data, some lacked the recommended elements outlined in the journal reporting standards for qualitative research. In particular, they lacked transparency when discussing the impact of background knowledge and positionality on data analytic processes and findings. In this review, we discuss the strengths and limitations of FE for social work research and offer recommendations for methodological improvement. To enhance understanding and trustworthiness of reported findings, we recommend transparency in discussions of data analytic and reflexive processes, as well as uniform reporting in accordance with APA standards for qualitative research.
引用
收藏
页码:777 / 796
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Disaster Preparedness in Social Work: A Scoping Review of Evidence for Further Research, Theory and Practice
    Boetto, Heather
    Bell, Karen
    Ivory, Nicola
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2021, 51 (05): : 1623 - 1643
  • [32] Client documents in social work with adults as research data: scoping review of opportunities and challenges
    Kuorikoski, Tuija
    NORDIC SOCIAL WORK RESEARCH, 2024, 14 (04) : 532 - 544
  • [33] Exploring how members of the public access and use health research and information: a scoping review
    Celayne Heaton-Shrestha
    Kristin Hanson
    Sophia Quirke-McFarlane
    Nancy Delaney
    Tushna Vandrevala
    Lindsay Bearne
    BMC Public Health, 23
  • [34] Exploring Mental Health Issues through the Use of Blogs: A Scoping Review of the Research Evidence
    Murphy, Esther
    Donohue, Grainne
    McCann, Edward
    ISSUES IN MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2020, 41 (04) : 296 - 305
  • [35] Exploring how members of the public access and use health research and information: a scoping review
    Heaton-Shrestha, Celayne
    Hanson, Kristin
    Quirke-McFarlane, Sophia
    Delaney, Nancy
    Vandrevala, Tushna
    Bearne, Lindsay
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [36] THE USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA TO GENERATE HEALTH DATA FOR EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH: A SCOPING REVIEW
    Kalf, R.
    Makady, A.
    Meijboom, K.
    Goettsch, W.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (07) : A471 - A471
  • [37] A scoping review of current research on social media use among children and adolescents
    Jungselius, Beata
    DISCOVER PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 4 (01):
  • [38] A scoping review on the use of machine learning in research on social determinants of health: Trends and research prospects
    Kino, Shiho
    Hsu, Yu-Tien
    Shiba, Koichiro
    Chien, Yung-Shin
    Mita, Carol
    Kawachi, Ichiro
    Daoud, Adel
    SSM-POPULATION HEALTH, 2021, 15
  • [39] Exploring research impact models: A systematic scoping review
    Razmgir, Maryam
    Panahi, Sirous
    Ghalichi, Leila
    Mousavi, Seyed Ali Javad
    Sedghi, Shahram
    RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2021, 30 (04) : 443 - 457
  • [40] Measuring Instruments for Empowerment in Social Work: A Scoping Review
    Noordink, Thomas
    Verharen, Lisbeth
    Schalk, Rene
    van Eck, Marcel
    van Regenmortel, Tine
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2021, 51 (04): : 1482 - 1508