Exploring the use of focused ethnography in social work research: A scoping review

被引:4
|
作者
Shannon, Patricia J. [1 ]
Soltani, Laura [1 ]
Sugrue, Erin [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Sch Social Work, 1404 Gortner Ave, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[2] Augsburg Univ, Sch Social Work, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
Culture; rigor; evaluation; ethnography; focused ethnography; scoping review; FAMILY COURT; CARE;
D O I
10.1177/14733250231214199
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Focused ethnography (FE) is an emerging method for social work researchers who examine social justice issues within specific sub-cultures and service systems. FE methods may include researchers with background knowledge, specific research questions, and the use of intensive, short-term data collection methods in time-limited settings. Although relevant to applied studies in social work, FE methods remain underspecified. This scoping review examines the extent, variety, and characteristics of FE in social work research. The protocol follows the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews Checklist and Explanation (PRISMA-ScR). We searched Social Science databases between 2018 and 2022. The critical appraisal of articles is guided by published FE methodology and American Psychological Association (APA) journal reporting standards for qualitative research. Researchers justified the use of FE in relation to their ethnographic goals, research populations, and specific questions. However, they were inconsistent in their discussion of the integration of theory and reflexive processes in research methods. While most studies used thematic analysis or coding of qualitative data, some lacked the recommended elements outlined in the journal reporting standards for qualitative research. In particular, they lacked transparency when discussing the impact of background knowledge and positionality on data analytic processes and findings. In this review, we discuss the strengths and limitations of FE for social work research and offer recommendations for methodological improvement. To enhance understanding and trustworthiness of reported findings, we recommend transparency in discussions of data analytic and reflexive processes, as well as uniform reporting in accordance with APA standards for qualitative research.
引用
收藏
页码:777 / 796
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The use of ethnography in social work research
    Floersch, Jerry
    Longhofer, Jeffrey
    Suskewicz, Jacob
    QUALITATIVE SOCIAL WORK, 2014, 13 (01) : 3 - 7
  • [2] A Scoping Review of Social Media Use in Social Work Practice
    Chan, Chitat
    JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-INFORMED SOCIAL WORK, 2016, 13 (03): : 263 - 276
  • [3] The capability approach in social work research: A scoping review of research addressing practical social work
    Kjellberg, Inger
    Jansson, Birgitta
    INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL WORK, 2022, 65 (02) : 224 - 239
  • [4] Conversation analysis in social work research: a scoping review
    Flinkfeldt, Marie
    Iversen, Clara
    Jorgensen, Sabine Ellung
    Monteiro, David
    Wilkins, David
    QUALITATIVE SOCIAL WORK, 2022, 21 (06) : 1011 - 1042
  • [5] Exploring the intersections of LGBTQ experience and social work education: a scoping review
    Mehrotra, Gita R.
    Hudson, Kimberly D.
    Hess, Eli
    SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION, 2024, 43 (07) : 2076 - 2095
  • [6] Exploring the Efficacy of Social Work Interventions in Hospital Settings: A Scoping Review
    Petruzzi, Liana
    Ewald, Bonnie
    Covington, Elle
    Rosenberg, Walter
    Golden, Robyn
    Jones, Barbara
    SOCIAL WORK IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 38 (02) : 147 - 160
  • [7] Exploring proactive work behavior: a scoping review of research trends and theories
    Satwika, Pratista Arya
    Suhariadi, Fendy
    Samian
    COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT, 2025, 12 (01):
  • [8] Practice education in social work: a scoping review of existing research
    Gregory, Mark
    Cook, Laura
    Butt, Tom
    Shakespeare, Joanna
    SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION, 2025,
  • [9] Social Work Research in the Field of Disability in Australia: A Scoping Review
    Bigby, Christine
    Tilbury, Clare
    Hughes, Mark
    AUSTRALIAN SOCIAL WORK, 2018, 71 (01) : 18 - 31