Deplatformization and the governance of the platform ecosystem

被引:41
|
作者
Van Dijck, Jose [1 ]
de Winkel, Tim [2 ]
Schafer, Mirko Tobias [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Media & Digital Soc, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, NL-3512 JP Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Utrecht, Mediastudies, Utrecht, Netherlands
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Big tech companies; Capitol siege; deplatforming; Gab; hate speech; Internet governance; platform economy;
D O I
10.1177/14614448211045662
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This article analyzes deplatformization as an implied governance strategy by major tech companies to detoxify the platform ecosystem of radical content while consolidating their power as designers, operators, and governors of that same ecosystem. Deplatformization is different from deplatforming: it entails a systemic effort to push back encroaching radical right-wing platforms to the fringes of the ecosystem by denying them the infrastructural services needed to function online. We identify several deplatformization strategies, using Gab as an example of a platform that survived its relegation and which subsequently tried to build an alternative at the edge of the mainstream ecosystem. Evaluating deplatformization in terms of governance, the question that arises is who is responsible for cleansing the ecosystem: corporations, states, civil society actors, or all three combined? Understanding the implied governance of deplatformization is imperative to assess the higher stakes in future debates concerning Internet governability.
引用
收藏
页码:3438 / 3454
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Solving service ecosystem governance
    Ruokolainen, Toni
    Ruohomaa, Sini
    Kutvonen, Lea
    2011 15TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISE DISTRIBUTED OBJECT COMPUTING CONFERENCE WORKSHOPS (EDOC 2011), 2011, : 18 - 25
  • [22] Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance, Platform Governance, and Value Creation of Platform Enterprises
    Su, Ruixin
    Li, Na
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (17)
  • [23] Dynamic capabilities for transitioning from product platform ecosystem to innovation platform ecosystem
    Haki, Kazem
    Blaschke, Michael
    Aier, Stephan
    Winter, Robert
    Tilson, David
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2024, 33 (02) : 181 - 199
  • [24] The End of "Corporate' Governance: Hello "Platform' Governance
    Fenwick, Mark
    McCahery, Joseph A.
    Vermeulen, Erik P. M.
    EUROPEAN BUSINESS ORGANIZATION LAW REVIEW, 2019, 20 (01) : 171 - 199
  • [25] The End of ‘Corporate’ Governance: Hello ‘Platform’ Governance
    Mark Fenwick
    Joseph A. McCahery
    Erik P. M. Vermeulen
    European Business Organization Law Review, 2019, 20 : 171 - 199
  • [26] Networked Platform Governance: The Construction of the Democratic Platform
    Caplan, Robyn
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2023, 17 : 3451 - 3472
  • [27] Research on Legitimacy Building and Governance of Transportation Service Platform Ecosystem Based on Three-Party Evolutionary Game
    Pan, Qiaohong
    Luo, Wenping
    Liu, Zongyuan
    Luan, Mengmeng
    SAGE OPEN, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [28] 'Measurementality' in biodiversity governance: knowledge, transparency, and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES)
    Turnhout, Esther
    Neves, Katja
    de Lijster, Elisa
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2014, 46 (03): : 581 - 597
  • [29] Governance options for science-policy interfaces on biodiversity and ecosystem services: comparing a network versus a platform approach
    Goerg, Christoph
    Wittmer, Heidi
    Carter, Caitriona
    Turnhout, Esther
    Vandewalle, Marie
    Schindler, Stefan
    Livorell, Barbara
    Lux, Alexandra
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2016, 25 (07) : 1235 - 1252
  • [30] Hello Platform Governance; But Never Ending Corporate Governance
    Cai, Qiang
    Hou, Hong
    EUROPEAN COMPANY LAW, 2022, 19 (02): : 47 - 56