An Empirical Evaluation of a Generative Artificial Intelligence Technology Adoption Model from Entrepreneurs' Perspectives

被引:6
|
作者
Gupta, Varun [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Gisma Univ Appl Sci, Multidisciplinary Res Ctr Innovat SMEs MrciS, D-14469 Potsdam, Germany
[2] Univ Leicester, Sch Comp & Math Sci, Leicester LE1 7RH, England
[3] Univ Alcala, Dept Econ & Business Adm, Plaza Victoria 2, Alcala De Henares 28802, Madrid, Spain
来源
SYSTEMS | 2024年 / 12卷 / 03期
关键词
Generative Artificial Intelligence; Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT); technology adoption; entrepreneurs; small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs);
D O I
10.3390/systems12030103
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Technologies, such as Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT, Smart PLS version 4), are prime examples of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI), which is a constantly evolving area. SMEs, particularly startups, can obtain a competitive edge, innovate their business models, gain business value, and undergo a digital transformation by implementing these technologies. Continuous but gradual experimentation with these technologies is the foundation for their adoption. The experience that comes from trying new technologies can help entrepreneurs adopt new technologies more strategically and experiment more with them. The urgent need for an in-depth investigation is highlighted by the paucity of previous research on ChatGPT uptake in the startup context, particularly from an entrepreneurial perspective. The objective of this research study is to empirically validate the Generative AI technology adoption model to establish the direction and strength of the correlations among the adoption factors from the perspectives of the entrepreneurs. The data are collected from 482 entrepreneurs who exhibit great diversity in their genders, the countries in which their startups are located, the industries their startups serve, their age, their educational levels, their work experience as entrepreneurs, and the length of time the startups have been on the market. Collected data are analyzed using the Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) technique, which results in a statistical examination of the relationships between the adoption model's factors. The results indicate that social influence, domain experience, technology familiarity, system quality, training and support, interaction convenience, and anthropomorphism are the factors that impact the pre-perception and perception phase of adoption. These factors motivate entrepreneurs to experiment more with the technology, thereby building perceptions of its usefulness, perceived ease of use, and perceived enjoyment, three factors that in turn affect emotions toward the technology and, finally, switching intentions. Control variables like age, gender, and educational attainment have no appreciable effect on switching intentions to alternatives of the Generative AI technology. Rather, the experience factor of running businesses shows itself to be a crucial one. The results have practical implications for entrepreneurs and other innovation ecosystem actors, including, for instance, technology providers, libraries, and policymakers. This research study enriches the Generative AI technology acceptance theory and extends the existing literature by introducing new adoption variables and stages specific to entrepreneurship.
引用
收藏
页数:53
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Artificial intelligence and communication technologies in academia: faculty perceptions and the adoption of generative AI
    Aya Shata
    Kendall Hartley
    International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22 (1)
  • [32] Quantification of cultural practices and diversity: An empirical experiment with generative artificial intelligence
    Messner, Wolfgang
    JOURNAL OF WORLD BUSINESS, 2025, 60 (03)
  • [33] AI and Case Management: From Artificial Intelligence to Generative Intelligence
    Powell, Suzanne K.
    PROFESSIONAL CASE MANAGEMENT, 2023, 28 (06) : 259 - 261
  • [34] Student perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence technologies in higher education
    Heather Johnston
    Rebecca F. Wells
    Elizabeth M. Shanks
    Timothy Boey
    Bryony N. Parsons
    International Journal for Educational Integrity, 20
  • [35] The Potential of Generative Artificial Intelligence Across Disciplines: Perspectives and Future Directions
    Ooi, Keng-Boon
    Tan, Garry Wei-Han
    Al-Emran, Mostafa
    Al-Sharafi, Mohammed A.
    Capatina, Alexandru
    Chakraborty, Amrita
    Dwivedi, Yogesh K.
    Huang, Tzu-Ling
    Kar, Arpan Kumar
    Lee, Voon-Hsien
    Loh, Xiu-Ming
    Micu, Adrian
    Mikalef, Patrick
    Mogaji, Emmanuel
    Pandey, Neeraj
    Raman, Ramakrishnan
    Rana, Nripendra P.
    Sarker, Prianka
    Sharma, Anshuman
    Teng, Ching-, I
    Wamba, Samuel Fosso
    Wong, Lai-Wan
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2025, 65 (01) : 76 - 107
  • [36] Student perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence technologies in higher education
    Johnston, Heather
    Wells, Rebecca F.
    Shanks, Elizabeth M.
    Boey, Timothy
    Parsons, Bryony N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EDUCATIONAL INTEGRITY, 2024, 20 (01)
  • [37] Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Teaching and Learning: Engineering Instructors' Perspectives
    Simelane, Phiwe M.
    Kittur, Javeed
    COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2025, 33 (01)
  • [38] Using generative artificial intelligence/ChatGPT for academic communication: Students' perspectives
    Liu, Yanhua
    Park, Jaeuk
    Mcminn, Sean
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2024, 34 (04) : 1437 - 1461
  • [39] Exploring student perspectives on generative artificial intelligence in higher education learning
    David Baidoo-Anu
    Daniel Asamoah
    Isaac Amoako
    Inuusah Mahama
    Discover Education, 3 (1):
  • [40] Business Intelligence Systems Adoption Model: An Empirical Investigation
    Rouhani, Saeed
    Ashrafi, Amir
    Ravasan, Ahad Zare
    Afshari, Samira
    JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL AND END USER COMPUTING, 2018, 30 (02) : 43 - 70