Clinical outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma patients after hepatectomy treated with TACE in combination with sorafenib: a propensity score matched analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Yujie [1 ]
Zhao, Ruichen [2 ]
Li, Xiao [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Dept Intervent Therapy, Natl Canc Ctr, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc,Canc Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); recurrent; sorafenib; transarterial chemoembolization (TACE); RECURRENCE; RESECTION; CHEMOEMBOLIZATION; PATTERNS; ANGIOGENESIS; MULTICENTER; CANCER;
D O I
10.21037/tcr-22-2784
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: To assess the long-term effects of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with sorafenib versus TACE alone procedures in recurrent patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: A total of 381 recurrent patients treated with partial hepatectomy undergoing either TACE + sorafenib treatment or TACE alone were included in this retrospective research. To minimize bias brought on by confounding factors, propensity score matching (PSM) was used. The clinical effectiveness, complications, and negative responses of two groups were noted. Overall survival (OS) was the main result. The secondary outcome was time to target tumor progression (TTTP). The risk variables for OS were investigated using the Cox proportional hazards model. Results: There were 32 individuals in each group following PSM. According to mRECIST (modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors), patients receiving TACE + sorafenib had a significantly longer TTTP compared to patients receiving sorafenib alone (P=0.017). The median OS was 48.5 months with TACE plus sorafenib and 41.0 months with TACE alone. At 5 years, however, survival was comparable between groups (P=0.300). In the combination group, the most frequent side effect was hand-foot skin reaction (81.3%), whereas, in the monotherapy group, the most frequent side effect was fatigue (71.9%). In neither group were there any treatment-related fatalities. Conclusions: Although TACE plus sorafenib did not significantly lengthen OS compared to TACE alone, it did considerably enhance TTTP.
引用
收藏
页码:1088 / 1099
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Donafenib versus sorafenib in triple therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score-matched multicenter analysis
    Yaohong Wen
    Shuyi Zhou
    Yuyan Xu
    Cheng Zhang
    Zhoubin Feng
    Yinghui Song
    Bai Ding
    Chuang Peng
    Hongkun Tan
    Chunming Wang
    Jianan Feng
    Jingyuan Pei
    Guolin He
    Shunjun Fu
    Lvhuan Wang
    Lei Cai
    Sulai Liu
    Mingxin Pan
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 23 (1)
  • [22] Hypoglycemia predicts survival after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score-based analysis
    Zhang Jie
    Qi Yapeng
    Gong Wenfeng
    Zhong Jianhong
    Lin YouZhi
    Qi Lunan
    Yuan Weiping
    Ma Liang
    Zhang Zhiming
    Li LeQun
    Xiang Bangde
    CANCER SCIENCE, 2018, 109 : 956 - 956
  • [23] The Clinical Significance of Myosteatosis in Survival Outcomes in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Sorafenib
    Kang, Min Kyu
    Song, Jeong Eun
    Jang, Se Young
    Kim, Byung Seok
    Chung, Woo Jin
    Lee, Changhyeong
    Park, Soo Young
    Tak, Won Young
    Kweon, Young Oh
    Hwang, Jae Seok
    Jang, Byoung Kuk
    Lee, Yu Rim
    Park, Jung Gil
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [24] Multicenter propensity score-matched analysis to compare perioperative morbidity after laparoscopic or robotic complex hepatectomy for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma
    Huang, Xiao-Kun
    Lu, Wen-Feng
    Liu, Si-Yu
    Fu, Tian-Wei
    Jin, Lei
    Du, Cheng-Fei
    Gao, Zhen-Yu
    Wang, Kai-Di
    Dai, Mu-Gen
    Zhong, Zhi-Han
    Ye, Tai-Wei
    Xiao, Zun-Qiang
    Cheng, Jian
    Shen, Guo-Liang
    Liu, Jie
    Liu, Jun-Wei
    Huang, Dong-Sheng
    Liang, Lei
    Zhang, Cheng-Wu
    HPB, 2024, 26 (08) : 1062 - 1071
  • [25] Survival outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma resection with postoperative complications - a propensity-score-matched analysis
    Chok, Kenneth S. H.
    Chan, Millies M. Y.
    Dai, Wing Chiu
    Chan, Albert C. Y.
    Cheung, Tan To
    Wong, Tiffany C. L.
    She, Wong Hoi
    Lo, Chung Mau
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (12)
  • [26] Prognostic impact of aspirin in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after liver resection: propensity-score-matched analysis
    Matsumoto, Takashi
    Kitano, Yuki
    Imai, Katsunori
    Ogawa, Daisuke
    Yumoto, Shinsei
    Takematsu, Toru
    Shiraishi, Yuta
    Itoyama, Rumi
    Nakagawa, Shigeki
    Mima, Kosuke
    Okabe, Hirohisa
    Nitta, Hidetoshi
    Hayashi, Hiromitsu
    Baba, Hideo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, 30 (01) : 92 - 98
  • [27] The clinical efficacy and safety of TACE combined with apatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis
    Chen, Cheng
    Duan, Xiaoting
    Shen, Yanfeng
    Li, Guiying
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2024, 61 (02) : 390 - 395
  • [28] Short-term outcomes of robotic versus open hepatectomy among overweight patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score-matched study
    Lin, Zhao-Yi
    Zhang, Xiu-Ping
    Zhao, Guo-Dong
    Li, Cheng-Gang
    Wang, Zhao-Hai
    Liu, Rong
    Hu, Ming-Gen
    BMC SURGERY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [29] Outcomes of pure laparoscopic Glissonian pedicle approach hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis
    Liu, Fei
    Xu, Hongwei
    Li, Qin
    Wei, Yonggang
    Li, Hongyu
    Wang, Wentao
    Wen, Tianfu
    Wu, Hong
    Yang, Jiayin
    Xu, Mingqing
    Li, Bo
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (04): : 1155 - 1166
  • [30] Outcomes of pure laparoscopic Glissonian pedicle approach hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis
    Fei Liu
    Hongwei Xu
    Qin Li
    Yonggang Wei
    Hongyu Li
    Wentao Wang
    Tianfu Wen
    Hong Wu
    Jiayin Yang
    Mingqing Xu
    Bo Li
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2019, 33 : 1155 - 1166