Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage patients' survival: A causal inference and prediction study

被引:1
|
作者
Deng, Fuxing [1 ]
Cao, Yaoyuan [2 ]
Zhao, Shuangping [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp, Dept Oncol, Changsha, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Sch Basic Med Sci, Dept Forens Med, Changsha, Peoples R China
[3] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp, Natl Clin Res Ctr Geriatr Disorders, Dept Intens Crit Unit, Changsha, Peoples R China
[4] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp, Natl Clin Res Ctr Geriatr Disorders, Dept Intens Crit Unit,Crit Care Med, Changsha 410008, Peoples R China
关键词
causal inference; interpretability machine learning; predictive survival model; upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1111/eci.14180
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundUpper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a common medical emergency. This study aimed to develop models to predict critically ill patients with upper GI bleeding in-hospital and 30-day survival, identify the correlation factor and infer the causality.MethodsA total of 2898 patients with upper GI bleeding were included from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV and eICU-Collaborative Research Database, respectively. To identify the most critical factors contributing to the prognostic model, we used SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) for machine learning interpretability. We performed causal inference using inverse probability weighting for survival-associated prognostic factors.ResultsThe optimal model using the light GBM (gradient boosting algorithm) algorithm achieved an AUC of .93 for in-hospital survival, .81 for 30-day survival in internal testing and .87 for in-hospital survival in external testing. Important factors for in-hospital survival, according to SHAP, were SOFA (Sequential organ failure assessment score), GCS (Glasgow coma scale) motor score and length of stay in ICU (Intensive critical care). In contrast, essential factors for 30-day survival were SOFA, length of stay in ICU, total bilirubin and GCS verbal score. Our model showed improved performance compared to SOFA alone.ConclusionsOur interpretable machine learning model for predicting in-hospital and 30-day mortality in critically ill patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding showed excellent accuracy and high generalizability. This model can assist clinicians in managing these patients to improve the discrimination of high-risk patients. This study, based on multicenter hospital data, aimed to develop models to predict in-hospital and 30-day survival of critically ill patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The optimal model using the light GBM algorithm achieved high accuracy and generalizability. Significant factors for in-hospital survival and significant factors for 30-day survival were causally inferred, and coefficients of prognostic impact were presented. This model can assist clinicians in managing these patients to improve the discrimination of high-risk patients.image
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Transfusion after acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage
    Rockall, Timothy A.
    LANCET, 2015, 386 (9989): : 110 - 112
  • [32] Outpatient management of minor upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage
    Hare, N. C.
    Warshow, U.
    Stephens, J.
    Hamad, N.
    Jackson, L. M.
    Thatcher, P.
    Murray, I. A.
    Hussaini, S. H.
    Michell, N. P.
    Dalton, H. R.
    GUT, 2007, 56 : A57 - A57
  • [33] Risk scoring in acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage
    Rockall, TA
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2006, 38 (01) : 10 - 11
  • [34] Comparison of inpatient and outpatient upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage
    Frank H. Klebl
    Nicole Bregenzer
    Lars Schöfer
    Wolfgang Tamme
    Julia Langgartner
    Jürgen Schölmerich
    Helmut Messmann
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2005, 20 : 368 - 375
  • [35] Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage - Dieulafoy's lesion
    Lim, CH
    Chalmers, DM
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 80 (946) : 492 - +
  • [36] Comparison of inpatient and outpatient upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage
    Klebl, FH
    Bregenzer, N
    Schöfer, L
    Tamme, W
    Langgartner, J
    Schölmerich, J
    Messmann, H
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2005, 20 (04) : 368 - 375
  • [37] Counterfactual prediction is not only for causal inference
    Dickerman, Barbra A.
    Hernan, Miguel A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 35 (07) : 615 - 617
  • [38] Distinguishing Description, Prediction, and Causal Inference
    Ito, Chisato
    Al-Hassany, Linda
    Kurth, Tobias
    Glatz, Toivo
    NEUROLOGY, 2025, 104 (04)
  • [39] CAUSAL INFERENCE AS A PREDICTION-PROBLEM
    BERK, RA
    CRIME AND JUSTICE-A REVIEW OF RESEARCH, 1987, 9 : 183 - 200
  • [40] Counterfactual prediction is not only for causal inference
    Barbra A. Dickerman
    Miguel A. Hernán
    European Journal of Epidemiology, 2020, 35 : 615 - 617