Real-world cost- effectiveness analysis: Tumor Treating Fields for newly diagnosed glioblastoma in China

被引:1
|
作者
Xiang, Yuliang [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Yingyao [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Zian [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Shanyan [1 ,2 ]
Qin, Zhiyong [3 ,4 ]
Chen, Lingchao [3 ,4 ]
Xiao, Dunming [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Shimeng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Key Lab Hlth Technol Assessment, Natl Hlth Commiss, 130 Dongan Rd, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Huashan Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Shanghai 200040, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Ctr Neurol Disorders, Shanghai 200040, Peoples R China
关键词
Cost-effectiveness analysis; Glioblastoma; Tumor Treating Fields; Real-world evidence; MAINTENANCE TEMOZOLOMIDE; SURVIVAL; MANAGEMENT; THERAPY; CANCER;
D O I
10.1007/s11060-024-04662-x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundGlioblastoma (GBM) stands as the most aggressive and prevalent primary brain malignancy. Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields), an innovative therapy complementing chemotherapy for GBM treatment, which can significantly enhance overall survival, disease progression-free survival, and patient's quality of life. However, there is a dearth of health economics evaluation on TTFields therapy both domestically and internationally.ObjectiveThe study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of TTFields + temozolomide (TMZ) in comparison to TMZ alone for newly diagnosed GBM patients. The intent is to provide robust economic evidence to serve as a foundation for policymaking and decision-making processes in GBM treatment.MethodsWe estimated outcomes for newly diagnosed GBM patients over a lifetime horizon using a partitioned survival model with three states: Progression-Free Survival, Progression Disease, and Death. The survival model was derived from a real-world study in China, with long-term survival data drawn from GBM epidemiology literature. Adverse event rates were sourced from the EF-14 trial data. Cost data, validated by expert consultation, was obtained from public literature and databases. Utility values were extracted from published literature. Using Microsoft Excel, we calculated expected costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over 15 years from a health system perspective. The willingness-to-pay threshold was set at three times the Chinese per capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in 2022, amounting to CN yen 242,928 (US$37,655) /QALY. A 5% discount rate was applied to costs and utilities. Results underwent analysis through single factor and probability sensitivity analyses.ResultsTTFields + TMZ demonstrated a mean increase in cost by CN yen 389,326 (US$57,859) and an increase of 2.46 QALYs compared to TMZ alone. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was CN yen 157,979 (US$23,474) per QALY gained. The model exhibited heightened sensitivity to changes in the discount rate. Probability sensitivity analysis indicates that, under the existing threshold, the probability of TTFields + TMZ being economical is 95.60%.ConclusionsThis cost-effectiveness analysis affirms that incorporating TTFields into TMZ treatment proves to be cost-effective, given a threshold three times the Chinese per capita GDP.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 267
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Nationwide Characteristics of Providers Utilizing Tumor Treating Fields for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma
    McClelland, S., III
    Sosanya, O.
    Mitin, T.
    Degnin, C.
    Chen, Y.
    Attia, A.
    Suh, J. H.
    Jaboin, J. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (03): : E302 - E303
  • [22] COMBINATION OF TUMOR TREATING FIELDS (TTFIELDS) AND RADIOCHEMOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED GLIOBLASTOMA
    Avgoustidou, M.
    Mahlknecht, U.
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2018, 20 : 235 - 235
  • [23] Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) in combination with radiochemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma
    Avgoustidou, M.
    Mahlknecht, U.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2019, 195 : S59 - S59
  • [24] Eighteen years' experience with tumor treating fields in the treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma
    Vymazal, Josef
    Kazda, Tomas
    Novak, Tomas
    Slanina, Petr
    Sroubek, Jan
    Klener, Jan
    Hrbac, Tomas
    Syrucek, Martin
    Rulseh, Aaron M. M.
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 12
  • [25] Clinical efficacy of tumor-treating fields for newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
    Liu, Yang
    Richardson, Margie
    Warren, Kwanza
    Strawderman, Myla S.
    Mohile, Nimish
    Milano, Michael T.
    Walter, Kevin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (15)
  • [26] Photodynamic therapy and tumor-treating fields therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma
    Fukami, Shinjiro
    Nagai, Kenta
    Onodera, Sho
    Saito, Yuki
    Akimoto, Jiro
    Kohno, Michihiro
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2025, 15
  • [27] Long-term survival, patterns of progression, and patterns of use for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated with or without Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) in a real-world setting
    Riegel, Devon C.
    Bureau, Britta L.
    Conlon, Patrick
    Chavez, Gordon
    Connelly, Jennifer M.
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2025, : 49 - 57
  • [28] Application of tumor treating fields for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: understanding of nationwide practice patterns
    Shearwood McClelland
    Oluwadamilola Sosanya
    Timur Mitin
    Catherine Degnin
    Yiyi Chen
    Albert Attia
    John H. Suh
    Jerry J. Jaboin
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2018, 140 : 155 - 158
  • [29] Application of tumor treating fields for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: understanding of nationwide practice patterns
    McClelland, Shearwood, III
    Sosanya, Oluwadamilola
    Mitin, Timur
    Degnin, Catherine
    Chen, Yiyi
    Attia, Albert
    Suh, John H.
    Jaboin, Jerry J.
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2018, 140 (01) : 155 - 158
  • [30] Association of tumor treating fields (TTFields) therapy with overall survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma
    Shah, Siddharth
    Nag, Aiswarya
    Lucke-Wold, Brandon
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2025,