Multi-fidelity and multi-objective aerodynamic short nacelle shape optimisation under different flight conditions

被引:3
|
作者
Tao, G. C. [1 ,2 ]
Wang, W. [1 ,2 ]
Ye, Z. T. [2 ]
Wang, Y. N. [1 ,2 ]
Luo, J. Q. [1 ]
Cui, J. H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Aeronaut & Astronaut, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, ZJUI Inst, Haining, Peoples R China
来源
AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL | 2024年 / 128卷 / 1321期
关键词
short nacelle; multi-objective optimisation; multi-fidelity; pareto front; TURBULENT FLOWS; ALGORITHMS; RATIO;
D O I
10.1017/aer.2023.66
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Throughout the course of a flight mission, a range of aerodynamic conditions, including design-point conditions and off-design conditions, are encountered. As the bypass ratio increases and the fan-pressure ratio decreases to reduce the engine's specific fuel consumption, the engine diameters increase, which results in an increase in the nacelle weight and overall drag. To reduce its weight and drag, a shorter nacelle with a length-to-diameter ratio L/D = 0.35 is investigated. In this study, an adaptive cokriging-based multi-objective optimisation method is applied to the design of a short aero-engine nacelle. Two nacelle performance metrics were employed as the objective functions for the optimisation routine. The cruise drag coefficient is evaluated under cruise conditions, whereas the intake pressure recovery is evaluated under takeoff conditions. The cokriging metamodel are refined using an effective infilling strategy, where high-fidelity samples are infilled via the modified Pareto fitness, and low-fidelity samples are infilled via the Pareto front. By combining parameterised geometry generation, automated mesh generation, numerical simulations, surrogate model construction, Pareto front exploration based on the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II and sample infilling, an integrated multi-objective optimisation framework for short aeroengine nacelles is developed. Two-objective and three-objective test functions are used to validate the effectiveness of the proposed framework. After the optimisation process, a set of non-dominated nacelle designs is obtained with better aerodynamic performance than the original design, demonstrating the effectiveness of the optimisation framework. Comparedwith the kriging-based optimisation framework, the cokriging-based optimisation framework outperforms the single-fidelity method with a higher hypervolume value at the same number of iteration loops.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 546
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multi-objective aerodynamic shape optimization for unsteady viscous flows
    Nadarajah, Siva K.
    Tatossian, Charles
    OPTIMIZATION AND ENGINEERING, 2010, 11 (01) : 67 - 106
  • [42] Multi-fidelity deep learning for aerodynamic shape optimization using convolutional neural network
    Tao, Guocheng
    Fan, Chengwei
    Wang, Wen
    Guo, Wenjun
    Cui, Jiahuan
    PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2024, 36 (05)
  • [43] Experiment and computation multi-fidelity multi-objective airfoil design optimization of fixed-wing UAV
    Tharathep Phiboon
    Krittin Khankwa
    Nutchanan Petcharat
    Nattaphon Phoksombat
    Masahiro Kanazaki
    Yuki Kishi
    Sujin Bureerat
    Atthaphon Ariyarit
    Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2021, 35 : 4065 - 4072
  • [44] Multi-fidelity design optimisation strategy under uncertainty with limited computational budget
    Péter Zénó Korondi
    Mariapia Marchi
    Lucia Parussini
    Carlo Poloni
    Optimization and Engineering, 2021, 22 : 1039 - 1064
  • [45] Multi-fidelity design optimisation strategy under uncertainty with limited computational budget
    Korondi, Peter Zeno
    Marchi, Mariapia
    Parussini, Lucia
    Poloni, Carlo
    OPTIMIZATION AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 22 (02) : 1039 - 1064
  • [46] Multi-objective optimisation for biopharmaceutical manufacturing under uncertainty
    Liu, Songsong
    Papageorgiou, Lazaros G.
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 119 : 383 - 393
  • [47] Experiment and computation multi-fidelity multi-objective airfoil design optimization of fixed-wing UAV
    Phiboon, Tharathep
    Khankwa, Krittin
    Petcharat, Nutchanan
    Phoksombat, Nattaphon
    Kanazaki, Masahiro
    Kishi, Yuki
    Bureerat, Sujin
    Ariyarit, Atthaphon
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 35 (09) : 4065 - 4072
  • [48] Multi-objective shape optimisation of an automotive universal joint assembly
    Cristello, Nick
    Kim, Il Yong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAVY VEHICLE SYSTEMS, 2009, 16 (03) : 271 - 293
  • [49] Multi-objective optimisation of aircraft flight trajectories in the ATM and avionics context
    Gardi, Alessandro
    Sabatini, Roberto
    Ramasamy, Subramanian
    PROGRESS IN AEROSPACE SCIENCES, 2016, 83 : 1 - 36
  • [50] Blended Wing Body Aircraft Conceptual Design Optimisation with Nonlinear Multi-fidelity Aerodynamic Surrogate Model
    Lyu, Shang
    Sung, Yicheng
    Chan, Joseph Lok Chun
    Smith, Howard
    AIAA AVIATION FORUM AND ASCEND 2024, 2024,