Multi-fidelity and multi-objective aerodynamic short nacelle shape optimisation under different flight conditions

被引:3
|
作者
Tao, G. C. [1 ,2 ]
Wang, W. [1 ,2 ]
Ye, Z. T. [2 ]
Wang, Y. N. [1 ,2 ]
Luo, J. Q. [1 ]
Cui, J. H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Aeronaut & Astronaut, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, ZJUI Inst, Haining, Peoples R China
来源
AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL | 2024年 / 128卷 / 1321期
关键词
short nacelle; multi-objective optimisation; multi-fidelity; pareto front; TURBULENT FLOWS; ALGORITHMS; RATIO;
D O I
10.1017/aer.2023.66
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Throughout the course of a flight mission, a range of aerodynamic conditions, including design-point conditions and off-design conditions, are encountered. As the bypass ratio increases and the fan-pressure ratio decreases to reduce the engine's specific fuel consumption, the engine diameters increase, which results in an increase in the nacelle weight and overall drag. To reduce its weight and drag, a shorter nacelle with a length-to-diameter ratio L/D = 0.35 is investigated. In this study, an adaptive cokriging-based multi-objective optimisation method is applied to the design of a short aero-engine nacelle. Two nacelle performance metrics were employed as the objective functions for the optimisation routine. The cruise drag coefficient is evaluated under cruise conditions, whereas the intake pressure recovery is evaluated under takeoff conditions. The cokriging metamodel are refined using an effective infilling strategy, where high-fidelity samples are infilled via the modified Pareto fitness, and low-fidelity samples are infilled via the Pareto front. By combining parameterised geometry generation, automated mesh generation, numerical simulations, surrogate model construction, Pareto front exploration based on the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II and sample infilling, an integrated multi-objective optimisation framework for short aeroengine nacelles is developed. Two-objective and three-objective test functions are used to validate the effectiveness of the proposed framework. After the optimisation process, a set of non-dominated nacelle designs is obtained with better aerodynamic performance than the original design, demonstrating the effectiveness of the optimisation framework. Comparedwith the kriging-based optimisation framework, the cokriging-based optimisation framework outperforms the single-fidelity method with a higher hypervolume value at the same number of iteration loops.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 546
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nacelle optimisation through multi-fidelity neural networks
    Sanchez-Moreno, Francisco
    MacManus, David
    Tejero, Fernando
    Sheaf, Christopher
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NUMERICAL METHODS FOR HEAT & FLUID FLOW, 2024, 34 (09) : 3615 - 3634
  • [2] Multi-objective System Optimization of Suborbital Spaceplane by Multi-fidelity Aerodynamic Analysis
    Tejika, Shintaro
    Fujikawa, Takahiro
    Yonemoto, Koichi
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 ASIA-PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY (APISAT 2021), VOL 1, 2023, 912 : 283 - 296
  • [3] Multi-Fidelity and Multi-Objective Global Shape Optimization of Overflow Spillways Design
    Oukaili, Fatna
    Bercovitz, Yvan
    Goeury, Cedric
    Zaoui, Fabrice
    Fonty, Thomas
    Jouve, Francois
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 39TH IAHR WORLD CONGRESS, 2022, : 2265 - 2273
  • [4] Airfoil Shape Optimisation Using a Multi-Fidelity Surrogate-Assisted Metaheuristic with a New Multi-Objective Infill Sampling Technique
    Aye, Cho Mar
    Wansaseub, Kittinan
    Kumar, Sumit
    Tejani, Ghanshyam G.
    Bureerat, Sujin
    Yildiz, Ali R.
    Pholdee, Nantiwat
    CMES-COMPUTER MODELING IN ENGINEERING & SCIENCES, 2023, 137 (03): : 2111 - 2128
  • [5] Leveraging trust for joint multi-objective and multi-fidelity optimization
    Irshad, Faran
    Karsch, Stefan
    Doepp, Andreas
    MACHINE LEARNING-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 5 (01):
  • [6] A Multi-Fidelity Approach for Aerodynamic Performance Computations of Formation Flight
    Singh, Diwakar
    Antoniadis, Antonios F.
    Tsoutsanis, Panagiotis
    Shin, Hyo-Sang
    Tsourdos, Antonios
    Mathekga, Samuel
    Jenkins, Karl W.
    AEROSPACE, 2018, 5 (02)
  • [7] Towards a multi-fidelity & multi-objective Bayesian optimization efficient algorithm
    Charayron, Remy
    Lefebvre, Thierry
    Bartoli, Nathalie
    Morlier, Joseph
    AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 142
  • [8] MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION OF RUNNER BLADES USING A MULTI-FIDELITY ALGORITHM
    Bahrami, Salman
    Tribes, Christophe
    Devals, Christophe
    Vu, Thi C.
    Guibault, Francois
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME POWER CONFERENCE, 2013, VOL 2, 2014,
  • [9] Correlated Multi-objective Multi-fidelity Optimization for HLS Directives Design
    Sun, Qi
    Chen, Tinghuan
    Liu, Siting
    Miao, Jin
    Chen, Jianli
    Yu, Hao
    Yu, Bei
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 DESIGN, AUTOMATION & TEST IN EUROPE CONFERENCE & EXHIBITION (DATE 2021), 2021, : 46 - 51
  • [10] MULTI-OBJECTIVE MULTI-FIDELITY OPTIMIZATION WITH ORDINAL TRANSFORMATION AND OPTIMAL SAMPLING
    Li, Haobin
    Li, Yueqi
    Lee, Loo Hay
    Chew, Ek Peng
    Pedrielli, Giulia
    Chen, Chun-Hung
    2015 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC), 2015, : 3737 - 3748