Weather Impact on Solar Farm Performance: A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques

被引:56
|
作者
Gopi, Ajith [1 ,2 ]
Sharma, Prabhakar [3 ]
Sudhakar, Kumarasamy [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Ngui, Wai Keng [4 ]
Kirpichnikova, Irina [6 ]
Cuce, Erdem [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaysia Pahang, Automot Engn Ctr, Energy Sustainabil Res Grp, Pekan 26600, Pahang, Malaysia
[2] Agcy New & Renewable Energy Res & Technol ANERT, Thiruvananthapuram 695033, India
[3] Delhi Skill & Entrepreneurship Univ, Sch Engn Sci, Delhi 110089, India
[4] Univ Malaysia Pahang, Fac Mech & Automot Engn Technol, Pekan 26600, Pahang, Malaysia
[5] Univ Malaysia Pahang, Fluid Ctr, Ctr Excellence Advancement Res Fluid Flow, Gambang 26300, Pahang, Malaysia
[6] South Ural State Univ Natl Res Univ, Dept Elect Power Stn Network & Supply Syst, 76 Prospekt Lenina, Chelyabinsk 454080, Russia
[7] Recep Tayyip Erdogan Univ, Fac Engn & Architecture, Dept Mech Engn, Zihni Derin Campus, TR-53100 Rize, Turkiye
基金
俄罗斯科学基金会;
关键词
artificial intelligence; forecasting; solar irradiance; energy generation; solar plant; neuro-fuzzy; PREDICTION; IRRADIATION; RADIATION; PLANT;
D O I
10.3390/su15010439
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Forecasting the performance and energy yield of photovoltaic (PV) farms is crucial for establishing the economic sustainability of a newly installed system. The present study aims to develop a prediction model to forecast an installed PV system's annual power generation yield and performance ratio (PR) using three environmental input parameters: solar irradiance, wind speed, and ambient air temperature. Three data-based artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, namely, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), response surface methodology (RSM), and artificial neural network (ANN), were employed. The models were developed using three years of data from an operational 2MWp Solar PV Project at Kuzhalmannam, Kerala state, India. Statistical indices such as Pearson's R, coefficient of determination (R-2), root-mean-squared error (RMSE), Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSCE), mean absolute-percentage error (MAPE), Kling-Gupta efficiency (KGE), Taylor's diagram, and correlation matrix were used to determine the most accurate prediction model. The results demonstrate that ANFIS was the most precise performance ratio prediction model, with an R-2 value of 0.9830 and an RMSE of 0.6. It is envisaged that the forecast model would be a valuable tool for policymakers, solar energy researchers, and solar farm developers.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparative analysis of machine learning techniques for enhanced vehicle tracking and analysis
    Rani, Seema
    Dalal, Sandeep
    Transportation Engineering, 2024, 18
  • [32] A Study of Machine Learning Techniques for Daily Solar Energy Forecasting Using Numerical Weather Models
    Aler, Ricardo
    Martin, Ricardo
    Valls, Jose M.
    Galvan, Ines M.
    INTELLIGENT DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING VIII, 2015, 570 : 269 - 278
  • [33] Machine learning techniques for daily solar energy prediction and interpolation using numerical weather models
    Martin, R.
    Aler, R.
    Valls, J. M.
    Galvan, I. M.
    CONCURRENCY AND COMPUTATION-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2016, 28 (04): : 1261 - 1274
  • [34] Machine Learning Techniques in Web Content Mining: A Comparative Analysis
    Anami, Basavaraj S.
    Wadawadagi, Ramesh S.
    Pagi, Veerappa B.
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION & KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2014, 13 (01)
  • [35] A comparative analysis of data sets using Machine Learning techniques
    Abhilash, C.B.
    Rohitaksha, K.
    Biradar, Shankar
    Souvenir of the 2014 IEEE International Advance Computing Conference, IACC 2014, 2014, : 24 - 29
  • [36] Comparative Analysis of Supervised Machine Learning Techniques for Sales Forecasting
    Raizada, Stuti
    Saini, Jatinderkumar R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2021, 12 (11) : 102 - 110
  • [37] Comparative study on sentimental analysis using machine learning techniques
    Enduri, Murali Krishna
    Sangi, Abdur Rashid
    Anamalamudi, Satish
    Manikanta, R. Chandu Badrinath
    Reddy, K. Yogeshvar
    Yeswanth, P. Lovely
    Reddy, S. Kiran Sai
    Karthikeya, Asish
    MEHRAN UNIVERSITY RESEARCH JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 42 (01) : 207 - 215
  • [38] A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques for Classification and Detection of Malware
    Al-Janabi, Maryam
    Altamimi, Ahmad Mousa
    2020 21ST INTERNATIONAL ARAB CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (ACIT), 2020,
  • [39] Comparative analysis of machine learning techniques for the prediction of DMPK parameters
    White, Zollie, III
    Lowe, Edward W., Jr.
    Meiler, Jens
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2012, 243
  • [40] A comparative analysis of machine learning techniques for student retention management
    Delen, Dursun
    DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2010, 49 (04) : 498 - 506