Effects of decentralization on firm performance: Evidence from Chinese county-level quasi-experiments

被引:12
|
作者
Jin, Haizhen [1 ]
机构
[1] Techno Management Res Inst, Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, KAIST Bldg N22-203, 291 Daehak-ro, Daejeon 34141, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Administrative decentralization; China; Firm ownership; Fiscal decentralization; Performance; ECONOMIC-GROWTH EVIDENCE; FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION; NATURAL EXPERIMENT; OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE; FEDERALISM; GOVERNMENT; REFORM; EDUCATION; MARKET; PROFITABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.econmod.2022.106116
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
How does decentralization affect enterprises at a microeconomic level? While many studies have identified decentralization's implications for macroeconomic outcomes, little is known about its impact on firms. This study applies county-level quasi-experiments of decentralization reforms in China to investigate the impact of decentralization on firm performance and its variance by type of decentralization and firm. Using firm-level data from 2003 to 2013, this study finds that administrative reform significantly improves firm performance by reducing costs and increasing profits. When implemented alone, however, fiscal reform has only an auxiliary effect and increases firm debt; the two reforms are complementary. Moreover, administrative reform has the greatest positive impact on private firms, with a smaller effect on foreign firms and a negative effect on state firms, due to economic needs. Fiscal reform has a greater negative impact on SOEs (state-owned enterprises) than on non-SOEs due to political closeness.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Growth and convergence across the United States: Evidence from county-level data
    Higgins, Matthew J.
    Levy, Daniel
    Young, Andrew T.
    REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2006, 88 (04) : 671 - 681
  • [22] Does transportation infrastructure construction promote population agglomeration? Evidence from 1838 Chinese county-level administrative units
    Han, Dongqing
    Attipoe, Sonny Gad
    Han, DongXu
    Cao, Jianmin
    CITIES, 2023, 140
  • [23] A dynamic stochastic frontier model to evaluate regional financial efficiency: Evidence from Chinese county-level panel data
    Zhang, Qing
    Xu, Zhizhou
    Feng, Tianjun
    Jiao, Jian
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2015, 241 (03) : 907 - 916
  • [24] How the Soybean Producer Subsidy Policy affects crop planting structure: evidence from Chinese county-level data
    Zhang, Siqi
    Cai, Rong
    Liang, Xintong
    Zhang, Weifu
    BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL, 2025, 127 (01): : 111 - 128
  • [25] Growth of regional economy and income inequality: county-level evidence from Florida, USA
    Kim, J
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2004, 36 (02) : 173 - 183
  • [26] Direct Food Sales in the United States: Evidence from State and County-Level Data
    Timmons, David
    Wang, Qingbin
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE, 2010, 34 (02): : 229 - 240
  • [27] Partisanship in the Trump Trade War: Evidence from County-Level Crop Planting Data
    Carcelli, Shannon
    Park, Kee Hyun
    INTERNATIONAL STUDIES QUARTERLY, 2024, 68 (04)
  • [28] Effect of fiscal decentralization on pollution reduction: Firm-level evidence from China
    Jiang, Weijie
    Li, Yidong
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2023, 129
  • [29] Spatial Disparities in Access to Healthcare Professionals in Sichuan: Evidence from County-Level Data
    Zhang, Ning
    Ning, Wei
    Xie, Tao
    Liu, Jinlin
    He, Rongxin
    Zhu, Bin
    Mao, Ying
    HEALTHCARE, 2021, 9 (08)
  • [30] GROWTH AND CONVERGENCE ACROSS CROATIA: EVIDENCE FROM COUNTY-LEVEL DATA EXTENDED ABSTRACT
    Sergo, Zdravko
    GLOBAL CHALLENGES FOR COMPETITIVENESS: BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT PERSPECTIVE, 2007, : 24 - 26