Does climate change surprise the profitability of energy firms? Empirical evidence from China

被引:9
|
作者
Cao, Ming [1 ]
Zhang, Fan [1 ]
Li, Jianglong [1 ]
Meng, Guanfei [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Econ & Finance, Xian, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
China; climate change; energy sector; environmental policy; firm profitability; QUANTILE REGRESSION; CONSUMPTION; IMPACT; TEMPERATURE; PERFORMANCE; GROWTH; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1002/bse.3196
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The energy sector matters the sustainable development directly and is sensitive to climate change. A few empirical studies concentrate on how climate change influences firm performance. Climate change brings higher production costs and lower efficiency on the supply side and leads to beneficial sale performance and improves profit. However, it is ambiguous to the relationship of supply-demand and revenue-cost levels, and their change is not consistent. Using panel data of 99 China-listed firms active in the energy sector over the period 2000-2020, this study aims to identify the causal relation between climate change and the profitability of energy firms while controlling for firm-specific and energy market-related factors. The quantile regression results show that temperature deviation (TDEV) positively impacts the profitability of energy firms, and this impact varies at different quantiles of the profitability distribution. These findings remain unchanged by four robustness checks. Moreover, mechanism results indicate that revenue and cost have different interaction effects on the causal relation. The findings of this study can provide forward-thinking expectations and assess climatic adaptation and risks, particularly inspired stakeholder engagements.
引用
收藏
页码:1418 / 1431
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Does competition from the informal sector affect firms? energy intensity? Evidence from China
    Zhao, Nan
    Liu, Xiaojie
    Zhang, Zizhe
    STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2022, 62 : 130 - 142
  • [22] Does household electrification alleviate energy poverty? Empirical evidence from China
    Li, Yue
    Xu, Yingzhi
    Sun, Wenyuan
    ENERGY, 2024, 313
  • [23] Climate Change, Biased Technological Advances and Agricultural TFP: Empirical Evidence from China
    Cao, Ying
    Fan, Zhixiong
    Chen, Weiqiang
    Cao, Zhijian
    Jiang, Anyin
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2024, 14 (08):
  • [24] An Empirical Investigation on the Impact of Marketing Communication Expenditure on Firms' Profitability: Evidence from India
    Banerjee, Neelotpaul
    Siddhanta, Somroop
    GLOBAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2015, 16 (04) : 609 - 622
  • [25] Impact of the Perpetual Existence of Firms on Profitability: Empirical Evidence from Food Industry in India
    Azhagaiah, Ramachandran
    Deepa, Raju
    PACIFIC BUSINESS REVIEW INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 5 (09): : 27 - 36
  • [26] How does digital finance affect energy consumption in China? Empirical evidence from China
    Zhang, Shuhao
    Li, Xuetong
    Shi, Daqian
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2023,
  • [27] Does oil price uncertainty affect renewable energy firms' investment? Evidence from listed firms in China
    Cao, Hong
    Guo, Litian
    Zhang, Lin
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 33
  • [28] Does Climate Change and Energy Consumption Affect the Food Security of European Union Countries? Empirical Evidence from a Panel Study
    Lacka, Irena
    Supron, Blazej
    Szczepaniak, Iwona
    ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (13)
  • [29] Mitigating pollution emissions of manufacturing firms: Does input servitization matter? Empirical evidence from China
    Chen, Fenglan
    Chen, Xing
    ENERGY, 2025, 320
  • [30] The impact of climate change and environmental regulation on energy poverty: evidence from China
    Tao, Zhang
    Chen, Yadi
    Wang, Zixuan
    Deng, Chengtao
    ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY AND SOCIETY, 2024, 14 (01):