Research on tradable green certificate contracts under the renewable portfolio standard

被引:0
|
作者
Ren, Lingzhi [1 ]
Yi, Ning [1 ]
Chen, Zhanghua [2 ]
Li, Zhiying [1 ]
Wang, Hui [3 ]
Li, Xiaopeng [1 ]
机构
[1] North China Univ Water Resources & Elect Power, Sch Management & Econ, Zhengzhou 450046, Peoples R China
[2] Univ New South Wales, Business Sch, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[3] China Natl Petr Corp, Econ & Technol Res Inst, Beijing, 100724, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
FEED-IN TARIFF; ENERGY; MARKETS; DIFFERENCE; BENEFITS; SYSTEM; SECTOR; POLICY; RISK;
D O I
10.1063/5.0186836
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The implementation of renewable portfolio standards inevitably affects the strategic behavior and performance of tradable green certificate (TGC) market participants and brings policy risks and market risks. Contract is considered an effective governance tool to avoid the risks of TGC trading and helps TGC market participants to make scientific decisions. The article built a TGC contract model while considering the uncertainty of TGC supply and demand and provided a scientific analysis for designing TGC contracts. Finally, a numerical example was given to verify the optimal solution of the TGC contract model. The main results of this study are as follows: (1) higher electricity retail price could contribute to increasing the optimal trading volume and price of the TGC contract; (2) an increase in the wholesale price of electricity could decrease the optimal trading price of the TGC contract, but its impact on the optimal trading volume depends on the quota ratio designed by the government; (3) the impact of unit fines on the TGC contract is completely different from that of a lower price limit, where a low unit penalty and a high lower price limit for the TGC trading system could improve the trading volume of the TGC contract while reducing its price; and (4) transaction costs inhibit the trading volume of TGC contracts, but the impact on the optimal price depends on the size of transaction costs shared by different market participants; the transaction costs should be equally borne between the different market participants in order to eliminate the impact of transaction costs on the trading price of the TGC contract.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Money for nothin' and coal for free: 'Technology neutrality' and biomass development under the Flemish tradable green certificate scheme
    Carton, Wim
    GEOFORUM, 2016, 70 : 69 - 78
  • [32] Value of Storage for Renewable Portfolio Standard
    Zhang, Jiasheng
    Gu, Nan
    Yu, Yang
    Wu, Chenye
    2020 IEEE POWER & ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING (PESGM), 2020,
  • [33] A national renewable portfolio standard? Not practical
    Apt, Jay
    Lave, Lester S.
    Pattanariyankool, Sompop
    ISSUES IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 25 (01) : 53 - 59
  • [34] Ownership structure and prices: A case study of the Swedish tradable green certificate market
    Coria, Jessica
    Jaraite, Jurate
    ENERGY POLICY, 2023, 183
  • [35] Discussion on Compensation Ancillary Service Scheme of Green Certificates Based on Renewable Portfolio Standard
    Liu Q.
    Yuan H.
    Yang Z.
    Fan H.
    Xu C.
    Dianli Xitong Zidonghua/Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2020, 44 (06): : 1 - 8
  • [36] Towards an international tradable green certificate system-The challenging example of Belgium
    Verhaegen, Karolien
    Meeus, Leonardo
    Belmans, Ronnie
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2009, 13 (01): : 208 - 215
  • [37] Tradable green certificates for renewable support: The role of expectations and uncertainty
    Hustveit, Magne
    Frogner, Jens Sveen
    Fleten, Stein-Erik
    ENERGY, 2017, 141 : 1717 - 1727
  • [38] Market Power and Welfare in Electricity Markets Employing Tradable Green Certificate Systems
    Currier K.M.
    Sun Y.
    International Advances in Economic Research, 2014, 20 (2) : 129 - 138
  • [39] When outcomes are the reflection of the analysis criteria: A review of the tradable green certificate assessments
    Darmani, Anna
    Rickne, Annika
    Hidalgo, Antonio
    Arvidsson, Niklas
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 62 : 372 - 381
  • [40] A tripartite evolutionary game model for tradable green certificate transaction strategies in China
    Yu, Shiwei
    Gong, Chengzhu
    Jia, Weidong
    Ma, Li
    OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (04)