共 50 条
A cluster-randomized trial of a brief multi-component intervention to improve tobacco outcomes in substance use treatment
被引:0
|作者:
Guydish, Joseph
[1
]
McCuistian, Caravella
[1
]
Hosakote, Sindhushree
[1
]
Le, Thao
[1
]
Masson, Carmen L. L.
[2
]
Campbell, Barbara K. K.
[3
]
Delucchi, Kevin
[2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Philip R Lee Inst Hlth Policy Studies, 490 Illinois St,Floor 7, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA
[3] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Div Gen Internal Med & Geriatr, Portland, OR USA
关键词:
Tobacco control;
Smoking cessation;
Substance use treatment;
Policy;
ADDICTION TREATMENT;
ADDRESSING TOBACCO;
SMOKING-CESSATION;
ORGANIZATIONAL-CHANGE;
NICOTINE DEPENDENCE;
CIGARETTE-SMOKING;
UNITED-STATES;
USE DISORDERS;
IMPLEMENTATION;
ADULTS;
D O I:
10.1186/s13011-023-00539-w
中图分类号:
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号:
摘要:
BackgroundSmoking prevalence is high among people in substance use disorder (SUD) treatment, and program interventions to address smoking are often complex and lengthy. This cluster-randomized trial tested whether a brief multi-component intervention impacted tobacco outcomes among staff and clients.MethodsSeven SUD treatment programs were randomly assigned to the multi-component intervention or to waitlist control. The 6-month intervention included a leadership motivation assessment, program incentives, 4 staff training sessions and a leadership learning community session. Survey data were collected from staff and clients at pre- and post-intervention. Outcomes were first compared across condition (intervention vs waitlist control), and then examined pre- to post-intervention with condition collapsed.ResultsStaff in the intervention (n = 48) and control conditions (n = 26) did not differ at post-intervention on smoking prevalence, self-efficacy to help clients quit, or practices used to help clients quit smoking. Intervention clients (n = 113) did not differ from controls (n = 61) in smoking prevalence or receipt of tobacco services. Pre-post comparisons collapsed across condition showed a decrease in client and staff smoking prevalence, which could not be attributed to the intervention, and a decrease in client receipt of cessation medication.ConclusionThe brief multi-component intervention did not support changes in smoking prevalence or in tobacco-related services received by clients. Other intervention features are needed to reduce smoking among SUD clients.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文