P2Y12 Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Real-World, Community-Based Comparison of Ischemic and Bleeding Outcomes

被引:0
|
作者
Sachdeva, Amit [1 ]
Mutyala, Ratnabhushan [2 ]
Mantri, Neha [3 ]
Zhu, Shiyun [4 ]
McNulty, Edward [3 ,4 ]
Solomon, Matthew [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Kaiser Permanente Northern Calif, Div Cardiol, Walnut Creek, CA 94596 USA
[2] Drexel Univ, Coll Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Kaiser Permanente Northern Calif, Div Cardiol, San Francisco, CA USA
[4] Kaiser Permanente Northern Calif, Div Res, Oakland, CA USA
[5] Kaiser Permanente Northern Calif, Div Cardiol, Oakland, CA USA
关键词
CLOPIDOGREL; TICAGRELOR; VALIDATION; EVENTS;
D O I
10.1155/2023/1147352
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Randomized trials have shown superiority of the novel P2Y12 inhibitors over clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but clinical beneft in the community remains controversial. Our objective was to compare the safety and efficacy of clopidogrel to ticagrelor and prasugrel in patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a real-world population. Methods. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with ACS who underwent PCI and were discharged with clopidogrel, ticagrelor, or prasugrel from 2012 to 2018 within Kaiser Permanente Northern California. We used Cox proportional hazard models with propensity-score matching to evaluate the association of the P2Y12 agent with the primary outcomes of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and bleeding events. Results. The study included 15,476 patients (93.1% on clopidogrel, 3.6% on ticagrelor and 3.2% on prasugrel). Compared to the clopidogrel group, ticagrelorand prasugrel patients were younger with less comorbidities. In multivariable models with propensity-score matching, we found a lower risk of all-cause mortality in the ticagrelor vs the clopidogrel group (HR (95% CI) 0.43 (0.20-0.92)), but no differences in the other endpoints, and no difference between prasugrel and clopidogrel among any endpoints. A larger proportion of patients on ticagrelor or prasugrel switched to an alternative P2Y12 agent vs. clopidogrel (p < 0.01), and a higher level of persistence was seen among patients on clopidogrel vs. ticagrelor (p = 0.03) or prasugrel (p < 0.01). Conclusion. Among patients with ACS who underwent PCI, we observed a lower risk of all-cause mortality in patients treated with ticagrelor vs clopidogrel, but no difference in other clinical endpoints nor any differences in endpoints between prasugrel vs. clopidogrel users. These results suggest that further study is needed to identify an optimal P2Y12 inhibitor in a real-world population.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Should P2Y12 inhibitors be given for 12 months in acute coronary syndrome?
    Christodoulidis, Georgios
    Baber, Usman
    Mehran, Roxana
    CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 29 (04) : 301 - 306
  • [22] Real-World Bleeding and Ischemic Events in Asian Patients on P2Y12-Inhibitors After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A National Claims Data Analysis
    Yonggu Lee
    Young-Hyo Lim
    Yongwhi Park
    Jinho Shin
    Advances in Therapy, 2021, 38 : 562 - 578
  • [23] Real-World Bleeding and Ischemic Events in Asian Patients on P2Y12-Inhibitors After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A National Claims Data Analysis
    Lee, Yonggu
    Lim, Young-Hyo
    Park, Yongwhi
    Shin, Jinho
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2021, 38 (01) : 562 - 578
  • [24] Prescription and Bleeding Rates and Clinical Outcomes of Contemporary P2Y12 Inhibitors Use in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Choe, Jeong Cheon
    Cha, Kwang Soo
    Kim, Doo Yeop
    Lee, Sun Hack
    Ahn, Jinhee
    Park, Jin Sup
    Lee, Hye Won
    Oh, Jun-Hyok
    Choi, Jung Hyun
    Lee, Han Cheol
    Hong, Taek Jong
    Jeong, Myeong Ho
    CIRCULATION, 2017, 136
  • [25] Evolving pattern of platelet P2Y12 inhibition in patients with acute coronary syndromes
    Joshi, Rajiv R.
    Hossain, Rashed
    Morton, Allison C.
    Ecob, Rosemary
    Judge, Heather M.
    Wales, Clare
    Walker, Jemma V.
    Karunakaran, Arun
    Storey, Robert F.
    PLATELETS, 2014, 25 (06) : 416 - 422
  • [26] Systematic reviews: causes of non-adherence to P2Y12 inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes and response to intervention
    Johnston, Nina
    Weinman, John
    Ashworth, Lucy
    Smethurst, Peter
    El Khoury, Jad
    Moloney, Clare
    OPEN HEART, 2016, 3 (02):
  • [27] Mismatch between the European and American guidelines on oral antiplatelet P2Y12 inhibitors after acute coronary syndromes
    Serebruany, V. L.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2013, 34 : 470 - 471
  • [28] P2Y12 inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes: How do we choose the best drug for our patients?
    Kristensen, Steen D.
    Grove, Erik L.
    Hvas, Anne-Mette
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2012, 108 (02) : 203 - 205
  • [29] P2Y(12) inhibitors for acute coronary syndromes: current perspectives
    Nawarskas, James J.
    Newsome, Cheyenne
    Anderson, Joe R.
    Ahmed, Bina
    RESEARCH REPORTS IN CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 6 : 123 - 143
  • [30] In-Hospital Bleeding and Mortality in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Treated with Tirofiban and Potent P2Y12 Inhibitors
    Akinci, Sinan
    Coner, Ali
    Akbay, Ertan
    Adar, Adem
    Muderrisoglu, Haldun
    TURK KARDIYOLOJI DERNEGI ARSIVI-ARCHIVES OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 50 (05): : 320 - 326