Implant selection in natural and stable direct-to-implant reconstruction with ten steps at nipple-sparing mastectomy

被引:0
|
作者
Sagir, Mehmet [1 ,4 ]
Guven, Erdem [1 ]
Eroz, Seda [2 ]
Uras, Cihan [3 ]
机构
[1] Private Acibadem Maslak Hosp, Dept Plast Surg, Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Private Acibadem Maslak Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncolog, Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Private Acibadem Maslak Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkiye
[4] Private Acibadem Maslak Hosp, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Aesthet Surg, TR-34457 Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
breast cancer; breast reconstruction; direct-to-implant reconstruction; immidiate breast reconstruction; niple-sparing mastectomy; AUTOLOGOUS BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; IMMEDIATE; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000033758
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Direct-to-implant reconstruction is one of the breast repair techniques after mastectomy. Implant selection is critical in the short- and long-term success of direct-to-implant reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy. In this study we developed a 10-step algorithm that we use before and during surgery. We aimed to obtain natural and stable breast reconstruction with this algorithm. In addition, we also aimed to evaluate which implants were selected using this algorithm and their short- and long-term outcomes. This retrospective study included 218 patients aged 27 to 60 years who underwent mastectomy and direct-to-implant reconstruction between November 2018 and December 2021. The patients were assigned into 4 groups according to amount of breast tissue removed. We developed a 10-step algorithm and these included: breast base, amount of breast tissue removed, evaluation of mastectomy skin flap, breast projection, ptosis, unilateral/bilateral reconstruction, chest wall deformity, patient's request, comorbid conditions and stabilization and arrangement of novel sulcus. The evaluation was made when the patient's photographs were taken at least 1 year after the surgery. The highest number of patients was recorded in group 3; in addition, mean age was also highest in group 3. The lowest number of patients was recorded in group 4. The body mass index showed a progressive increase from group 1 to group 4. Medium height moderate profile prosthesis was used in 81.7% while medium height moderate plus profile prosthesis was used in 18.3% of breasts included. We used larger prosthesis up to 58.1% when compared to the tissue removed in group 1 while we used smaller prosthesis by 25.6% in group 4. In the anterior view, the medial and lateral arch of the lower pole of the breast was obtained in all patients. Obvious asymmetry developed in 4 patients. In lateral and oblique views, upper and lower pole natural breast images were obtained in all patients, except for 5 patients. There was no sulcus inferior displacement in any patient. Implant extrusion did not occur in any patient. This algorithm is an easy to use and effective method to obtain a stable and natural breast image in the long-term.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ASO Author Reflections: A Novel Technique of Transaxillary Reverse-Sequence Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction
    Mengxue Qiu
    Faqing Liang
    Yanyan Xie
    Huanzuo Yang
    Qing Zhang
    Jiayuan Zhong
    Hui Dai
    Zhenggui Du
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2024, 31 : 2791 - 2792
  • [42] A descriptive comparison of satisfaction and well-being between expander-based and direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Egidio Riggio
    Sara Alfieri
    Elisa Toffoli
    Claudia Borreani
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2023, 47 : 30 - 39
  • [43] ASO Author Reflections: A Novel Technique of Transaxillary Reverse-Sequence Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction
    Qiu, Mengxue
    Liang, Faqing
    Xie, Yanyan
    Yang, Huanzuo
    Zhang, Qing
    Zhong, Jiayuan
    Dai, Hui
    Du, Zhenggui
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (04) : 2791 - 2792
  • [44] Invited Response: Expander-Based and Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction After Nipple- Sparing Mastectomy
    Riggio, Egidio
    Alfieri, Sara
    Borreani, Claudia
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 47 (SUPPL 1) : 151 - 153
  • [45] Invited Response: Expander-Based and Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction After Nipple- Sparing Mastectomy
    Egidio Riggio
    Sara Alfieri
    Claudia Borreani
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2023, 47 : 151 - 153
  • [46] Direct-To-Implant and 2-Stage Breast Reconstruction After Nipple Sparing Mastectomy Results of a Retrospective Comparison
    Pallara, Tiziano
    Cagli, Barbara
    Fortunato, Lucio
    Altomare, Vittorio
    Loreti, Andrea
    Grasso, Antonella
    Manna, Elena
    Persichetti, Paolo
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2019, 83 (04) : 392 - 395
  • [47] Immediate Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Traditional Subpectoral Technique versus Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Reconstruction without Acellular Dermal Matrix
    Franceschini, Gianluca
    Scardina, Lorenzo
    Di Leone, Alba
    Terribile, Daniela Andreina
    Sanchez, Alejandro Martin
    Magno, Stefano
    D'Archi, Sabatino
    Franco, Antonio
    Mason, Elena Jane
    Carnassale, Beatrice
    Murando, Federica
    Orlandi, Armando
    Barone Adesi, Liliana
    Visconti, Giuseppe
    Salgarello, Marzia
    Masetti, Riccardo
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2021, 11 (02): : 1 - 12
  • [48] Immediate implant reconstruction using absorbable TIGR mesh after nipple-sparing mastectomy
    Quinn, Edel Marie
    Barry, Mitchel
    Kell, Malcolm
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 43 (03) : 279 - 284
  • [49] Analysis of patient-reported outcomes following nipple-sparing mastectomy and implant reconstruction
    Pharmer, L. A.
    Koslow, S. B.
    Martins, D.
    Theodore, R.
    Christos, P. J.
    Talmor, M.
    Simmons, R. M.
    Tousimis, E.
    Swistel, A. J.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 73
  • [50] Secondary Mastopexy After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Staged Subcutaneous Expander/Implant Reconstruction
    Salibian, Arthur H.
    Harness, Jay K.
    Mowlds, Donald S.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2018, 80 (05) : 475 - 480