Implant selection in natural and stable direct-to-implant reconstruction with ten steps at nipple-sparing mastectomy

被引:0
|
作者
Sagir, Mehmet [1 ,4 ]
Guven, Erdem [1 ]
Eroz, Seda [2 ]
Uras, Cihan [3 ]
机构
[1] Private Acibadem Maslak Hosp, Dept Plast Surg, Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Private Acibadem Maslak Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncolog, Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Private Acibadem Maslak Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkiye
[4] Private Acibadem Maslak Hosp, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Aesthet Surg, TR-34457 Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
breast cancer; breast reconstruction; direct-to-implant reconstruction; immidiate breast reconstruction; niple-sparing mastectomy; AUTOLOGOUS BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; IMMEDIATE; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000033758
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Direct-to-implant reconstruction is one of the breast repair techniques after mastectomy. Implant selection is critical in the short- and long-term success of direct-to-implant reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy. In this study we developed a 10-step algorithm that we use before and during surgery. We aimed to obtain natural and stable breast reconstruction with this algorithm. In addition, we also aimed to evaluate which implants were selected using this algorithm and their short- and long-term outcomes. This retrospective study included 218 patients aged 27 to 60 years who underwent mastectomy and direct-to-implant reconstruction between November 2018 and December 2021. The patients were assigned into 4 groups according to amount of breast tissue removed. We developed a 10-step algorithm and these included: breast base, amount of breast tissue removed, evaluation of mastectomy skin flap, breast projection, ptosis, unilateral/bilateral reconstruction, chest wall deformity, patient's request, comorbid conditions and stabilization and arrangement of novel sulcus. The evaluation was made when the patient's photographs were taken at least 1 year after the surgery. The highest number of patients was recorded in group 3; in addition, mean age was also highest in group 3. The lowest number of patients was recorded in group 4. The body mass index showed a progressive increase from group 1 to group 4. Medium height moderate profile prosthesis was used in 81.7% while medium height moderate plus profile prosthesis was used in 18.3% of breasts included. We used larger prosthesis up to 58.1% when compared to the tissue removed in group 1 while we used smaller prosthesis by 25.6% in group 4. In the anterior view, the medial and lateral arch of the lower pole of the breast was obtained in all patients. Obvious asymmetry developed in 4 patients. In lateral and oblique views, upper and lower pole natural breast images were obtained in all patients, except for 5 patients. There was no sulcus inferior displacement in any patient. Implant extrusion did not occur in any patient. This algorithm is an easy to use and effective method to obtain a stable and natural breast image in the long-term.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction
    Colwell, Amy S.
    Christensen, Joani M.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 140 (05) : 44S - 50S
  • [2] Implant volume estimation in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy
    Shia, Wei-Chung
    Yang, Hui-Ju
    Wu, Hwa-Koon
    Lin, Shih-Lung
    Lai, Hung-Wen
    Huang, Yu-Len
    Chen, Dar-Ren
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 231 : 290 - 296
  • [3] Modified Bidirectional Adipodermal Mastopexy, Nipple-sparing Mastectomy, and Direct-to-implant Reconstruction in Patients with Significant Ptosis
    Schwartz, Jean-Claude D.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2022, 10 (11) : E4666
  • [4] Nipple-sparing mastectomy with implant reconstruction: the Westmead experience
    Sood, Samriti
    Elder, Elisabeth
    French, James
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 85 (05) : 363 - 367
  • [5] Endoscopic-assisted Nipple-sparing Mastectomy with Direct-to-Implant Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction in the Management of Breast Cancer
    Zhang, Songbo
    Xie, Yanyan
    Liang, Faqing
    Wang, Yao
    Lv, Qing
    Du, Zhenggui
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2021, 9 (12)
  • [6] Reply: How to Preshape the Breast for a Successful Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction in the Challenging Breast
    Gunnarsson, Gudjon L.
    Thomsen, Jorn Bo
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 141 (04) : 610E - 611E
  • [7] Nipple malposition after nipple-sparing mastectomy and expander–implant reconstruction
    Hiroki Mori
    Noriko Uemura
    Mutsumi Okazaki
    Tsuyoshi Nakagawa
    Takanobu Sato
    Breast Cancer, 2016, 23 : 740 - 744
  • [8] Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Nipple-Sparing and Skin-Sparing Mastectomy in Breast-Augmented Patients: Prepectoral or Submuscular Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction?
    Salgarello, Marzia
    Fabbri, Mariachiara
    Visconti, Giuseppe
    Adesi, Liliana Barone
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2024, 44 (05) : 503 - 515
  • [9] Breast Reconstruction Actualized in Nipple-sparing Mastectomy and Direct-to-implant, Prepectoral Polyurethane Positioning: Early Experience and Preliminary Results
    de Vita, Roy
    Buccheri, Ernesto Maria
    Villanucci, Amedeo
    Pozzi, Marcello
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2019, 19 (02) : E358 - E363
  • [10] Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction without Placement of Acellular Dermal Matrix or Mesh after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy
    Urban, Cicero
    Gonzalez, Eduardo
    Fornazari, Alessandra
    Berman, Gaston
    Spautz, Cleverton
    Kuroda, Flavia
    Anselmi, Karina Furlan
    Rabinovich, Iris
    Doria, Maira
    Nissen, Leonardo
    Schunemann, Eduardo, Jr.
    Sobreiro, Bernardo
    Lima, Rubens
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 150 (05) : 973 - 983