Be Explicit: Identifying and Addressing Misaligned Goals in Collaborative Research Teams

被引:0
|
作者
Haas, Nicholas [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Polit Sci, Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S1049096522000944
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The misalignment of goals among researchers, external organizational partners (OPs), and study participants is thought to pose a challenge to the successful implementation of collaborative research projects. However, the goals of different collaborative team members almost never are elicited, making identification of misalignment and its potential consequences a difficult task. In this evaluation of a United Nations Nonviolent Communication Program conducted in Bangladesh, the Maldives, and Sri Lanka, I collected qualitative and quantitative data on OPs' and study participants' expected program impacts. I find that there are differences in OP and participant goals and that misalignment appears to bear some responsibility for participant dissatisfaction with the program. I also observe evidence that as the program progressed, participants' expected program impacts began to more closely approximate those of the OPs. I conclude with thoughts on the benefits of explicitly measuring research team goals and expectations and addressing their misalignment.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 87
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Essential team science skills for biostatisticians on collaborative research teams
    Slade, Emily
    Brearley, Ann M.
    Coles, Adrian
    Hayat, Matthew J.
    Kulkarni, Pandurang M.
    Nowacki, Amy S.
    Oster, Robert A.
    Posner, Michael A.
    Samsa, Gregory
    Spratt, Heidi
    Troy, Jesse
    Pomann, Gina-Maria
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2023, 7 (01)
  • [22] Establishing and maintaining international collaborative research teams: an autobiographical insight
    Carr, T. J.
    van der Walt, C.
    Watson, F.
    Linda, N.
    TD-THE JOURNAL FOR TRANSDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH IN SOUTHERN AFRICA, 2013, 9 (01) : 94 - 112
  • [23] Researchers’ Perceptions of Ethical Authorship Distribution in Collaborative Research Teams
    Elise Smith
    Bryn Williams-Jones
    Zubin Master
    Vincent Larivière
    Cassidy R. Sugimoto
    Adèle Paul-Hus
    Min Shi
    Elena Diller
    Katie Caudle
    David B. Resnik
    Science and Engineering Ethics, 2020, 26 : 1995 - 2022
  • [24] The International Business Academic and Business Ecosystem Is Misaligned, but Alignment May Miss the Larger Research Goals
    Behrens, Alfredo
    THUNDERBIRD INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2012, 54 (02) : 239 - 243
  • [25] Operational challenges in collaborative research projects: Addressing conflict multidimensionality
    Loehr, Katharina
    Bonatti, Michelle
    Homem, Larissa Hery Ito Ribeiro
    Schlindwein, Sandro Luis
    Sieber, Stefan
    KYBERNETES, 2018, 47 (06) : 1074 - 1089
  • [26] Identifying and addressing national barriers for clinical oncologists in radiotherapy research
    Rowlands, Shannon
    Adams, Richard
    Gwynne, Sarah
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S2692 - S2694
  • [27] Identifying and Managing Creative Tasks in Collaborative IS Research Projects
    vom Brocke, Jan
    Lippe, Sonia
    PROJECT MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2013, 44 (06) : 94 - 113
  • [28] Communication in international collaborative research teams A review of the state of the art and open research questions
    Woehlert, Romy
    SCM STUDIES IN COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA, 2020, 9 (02): : 151 - 217
  • [29] A SENIOR MULTIDISCIPLINARY PROSTATE CANCER CLINIC-IDENTIFYING THE PATIENT POPULATION AND ADDRESSING TREATMENT GOALS
    Madsen, Lydia
    Kim, Jeri
    Craig, Catherine
    Cheung, Min Rex
    Kuban, Deborah
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2008, 35 (06) : 979 - 979
  • [30] Mixed methods research teams: leveraging integrative teamwork for addressing complex problems
    Poth, Cheryl
    Georgiou, George
    Mack, Emily
    Kierstead, Matthew
    FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2024, 9