Landscape composition and pollinator traits interact to influence pollination success in an individual-based model

被引:6
|
作者
Kortsch, Susanne [1 ]
Saravia, Leonardo [2 ]
Cirtwill, Alyssa R. R. [1 ]
Timberlake, Thomas [3 ]
Memmott, Jane [3 ]
Kendall, Liam [4 ]
Roslin, Tomas [1 ,5 ,6 ]
Strona, Giovanni [5 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Fac Agr & Forestry, Spatial Foodweb Ecol Grp, Dept Agr Sci, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Ctr Austral Invest Cient Consejo Nacl Invest Cient, Ushuaia, Argentina
[3] Univ Bristol, Sch Biol Sci, Bristol, England
[4] Lund Univ, Ctr Environm & Climate Sci, Lund, Sweden
[5] Univ Helsinki, Fac Biol & Environm Sci, Organismal & Evolutionary Biol Res Programme, Helsinki, Finland
[6] Swedish Agr Univ, Dept Ecol, Uppsala, Sweden
[7] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Ispra, Italy
基金
欧洲研究理事会; 芬兰科学院; 美国国家科学基金会; 英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
agent-based model; habitat heterogeneity; movement ecology; Netlogo; patch size; visitation rate; INTERSPECIFIC POLLEN TRANSFER; BODY-SIZE; CONSEQUENCES; COMPETITION; DIVERSITY; SPEED; BEES;
D O I
10.1111/1365-2435.14353
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The arrangement of plant species within a landscape influences pollination via changes in pollinator movement trajectories and plant-pollinator encounter rates. Yet the combined effects of landscape composition and pollinator traits (especially specialisation) on pollination success remain hard to quantify empirically.We used an individual-based model to explore how landscape and pollinator specialisation (degree) interact to influence pollination. We modelled variation in the landscape by generating gradients of plant species intermixing-from no mixing to complete intermixing. Furthermore, we varied the level of pollinator specialisation by simulating plant-pollinator (six to eight species) networks of different connectance. We then compared the impacts of these drivers on three proxies for pollination: visitation rate, number of consecutive visits to the focal plant species and expected number of plants pollinated.We found that the spatial arrangements of plants and pollinator degree interact to determine pollination success, and that the influence of these drivers on pollination depends on how pollination is estimated. For most pollinators, visitation rate increases in more plant mixed landscapes. Compared to the two more functional measures of pollination, visitation rate overestimates pollination service. This is particularly severe in landscapes with high plant intermixing and for generalist pollinators. Interestingly, visitation rate is less influenced by pollinator traits (pollinator degree and body size) than are the two functional metrics, likely because 'visitation rate' ignores the order in which pollinators visit plants. However, the visitation sequence order is crucial for the expected number of plants pollinated, since only prior visits to conspecific individuals can contribute to pollination. We show here that this order strongly depends on the spatial arrangements of plants, on pollinator traits and on the interaction between them.Taken together, our findings suggest that visitation rate, the most commonly used proxy for pollination in network studies, should be complemented with more functional metrics which reflect the frequency with which individual pollinators revisit the same plant species. Our findings also suggest that measures of landscape structure such as plant intermixing and density-in combination with pollinators' level of specialism-can improve estimates of the probability of pollination.
引用
收藏
页码:2056 / 2071
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Individual variability and metapopulation dynamics: An individual-based model
    Uchmanski, Janusz
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2016, 334 : 8 - 18
  • [32] Influence of reproductive traits on pollination success in two Daphne species (Thymelaeaceae)
    Javier Rodríguez-Pérez
    Anna Traveset
    Journal of Plant Research, 2011, 124 : 277 - 287
  • [33] Influence of reproductive traits on pollination success in two Daphne species (Thymelaeaceae)
    Rodriguez-Perez, Javier
    Traveset, Anna
    JOURNAL OF PLANT RESEARCH, 2011, 124 (02) : 277 - 287
  • [34] A comparison of individual-based genetic distance metrics for landscape genetics
    Shirk, A. J.
    Landguth, E. L.
    Cushman, S. A.
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, 2017, 17 (06) : 1308 - 1317
  • [35] Intraspecific competition and spatial heterogeneity alter life history traits in an individual-based model of grasshoppers*
    Fielding, DJ
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2004, 175 (02) : 169 - 187
  • [36] Pollination biology of Eulophia alta (Orchidaceae) in Amazonia: effects of pollinator composition on reproductive success in different populations
    Juergens, Andreas
    Bosch, Simone R.
    Webber, Antonio C.
    Witt, Taina
    Frame, Dawn
    Gottsberger, Gerhard
    ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2009, 104 (05) : 897 - 912
  • [37] CDMetaPOP: an individual-based, eco-evolutionary model for spatially explicit simulation of landscape demogenetics
    Landguth, Erin L.
    Bearlin, Andrew
    Day, Casey C.
    Dunham, Jason
    METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2017, 8 (01): : 4 - 11
  • [38] An individual-based stochastic model of the spread of tuberculosis
    Pertsev N.V.
    Pichugin B.Y.
    Journal of Applied and Industrial Mathematics, 2010, 4 (3) : 359 - 370
  • [39] Friendship, reciprocation, and interchange in an individual-based model
    Puga-Gonzalez, Ivan
    Hoscheid, Anne
    Hemelrijk, Charlotte K.
    BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 2015, 69 (03) : 383 - 394
  • [40] Individual-Based Model use in Marine Policy
    Gray, Chelsea
    Rothman, Dale S.
    Peters-Burton, Erin
    Smith, Cynthia
    Parsons, E. C. M.
    JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2023, 20 (01)