A comparative study of machine learning methods for gas hydrate identification

被引:7
|
作者
Tian, Dongmei [1 ]
Yang, Shengxiong [1 ]
Gong, Yuehua [2 ]
Geng, Minghui [1 ,2 ]
Li, Yuanheng [1 ]
Hu, Guang [1 ]
机构
[1] Southern Marine Sci & Engn Guangdong Lab Guangzhou, Guangzhou 511458, Peoples R China
[2] China Geol Survey, Guangzhou Marine Geol Survey, Guangzhou 510760, Peoples R China
来源
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Gas hydrate; Machine learning algorithm; Classification; NETWORK; SLOPE; BASIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.geoen.2023.211564
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Gas hydrates are a kind of efficient and clean energy that is recognized as the ideal alternative energy for fossil fuels in the future. Accurate identification of gas hydrate reservoirs is a prerequisite for the application of gas hydrate resources. Artificial intelligence algorithms have been widely applied to solve geological research problems and have obtained good results. Therefore, we use machine learning algorithms to analyze whether sediments contain gas hydrates in the Oregon Hydrate Ridge. In this paper, several commonly used machine learning algorithms are selected, including the random forest, bagging, decision tree, AdaBoost, support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbor (KNN) and gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT). The P- and S-wave velocities (Vp and Vs, respectively) that have high sensitivities to hydrate changes are analyzed, the parameters of different algorithm models are optimized through training, and the classification effects of different algorithm models are compared in detail. Finally, the results show that these algorithms can better distinguish whether there are hydrates in the sediments. Compared with other algorithms, the random forest has the highest accuracy, precision and f1 score in the results of testing hydrate identification models; the AdaBoost has the highest recall; and the KNN has the closest area under curve (AUC) value to 1. The combination of artificial intelligence and resource exploration greatly improves the efficiency and accuracy of hydrate identification, which provides strong support for the subsequent development and utilization of gas hydrate resources.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Comparative Study of the Method to Rapid Identification of the Mural Pigments by Combining LIBS-Based Dataset and Machine Learning Methods
    Sun, Duixiong
    Zhang, Yiming
    Yin, Yaopeng
    Zhang, Zhao
    Qian, Hengli
    Wang, Yarui
    Yu, Zongren
    Su, Bomin
    Dong, Chenzhong
    Su, Maogen
    CHEMOSENSORS, 2022, 10 (10)
  • [32] A Machine Learning Approach for Gas Kick Identification
    Obi C.E.
    Falola Y.
    Manikonda K.
    Hasan A.R.
    Hassan I.G.
    Rahman M.A.
    SPE Drilling and Completion, 2023, 38 (04): : 663 - 681
  • [33] A Machine Learning Approach for Gas Kick Identification
    Obi, C. E.
    Falola, Y.
    Manikonda, K.
    Hasan, A. R.
    Hassan, I. G.
    Rahman, M. A.
    SPE DRILLING & COMPLETION, 2023, 38 (04) : 663 - 681
  • [34] Review on comprehensive geophysical identification methods of marine natural gas hydrate
    Lei Y.
    Wu S.
    Sun J.
    Wang G.
    Zhongnan Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2022, 53 (03): : 864 - 878
  • [35] Exploring Machine Learning Techniques for Accurate Prediction of Methane Hydrate Formation Temperature in Brine: A Comparative Study
    Aleem, Waqas
    Ahmad, Sheraz
    Qamar, Sabih
    Hussain, Maham
    Ali, Omer
    Rauf, Abdul
    ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 49 (06) : 8983 - 8996
  • [36] Efficient Wind Power Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods: A Comparative Study
    Alkesaiberi, Abdulelah
    Harrou, Fouzi
    Sun, Ying
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (07)
  • [37] Comparative Study of Machine Learning and System Identification for Process Systems Engineering Dynamics
    Ahmed, Akhil
    del Rio-Chanona, Ehecatl Antonio
    Mercangoz, Mehmet
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2025, 64 (08) : 4450 - 4478
  • [38] A comparative study of different machine learning methods on microarray gene expression data
    Mehdi Pirooznia
    Jack Y Yang
    Mary Qu Yang
    Youping Deng
    BMC Genomics, 9
  • [39] Machine learning methods for predicting the uniaxial compressive strength of the rocks: a comparative study
    Wen, Tao
    Li, Decheng
    Wang, Yankun
    Hu, Mingyi
    Tang, Ruixuan
    FRONTIERS OF EARTH SCIENCE, 2024, 18 (02) : 400 - 411
  • [40] A comparative study on image-based snake identification using machine learning
    Rajabizadeh, Mahdi
    Rezghi, Mansoor
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)