Powder bed defect classification methods: deep learning vs traditional machine learning

被引:0
|
作者
Du Rand, Francois [1 ]
van der Merwe, Andre Francois [2 ]
van Tonder, Malan [2 ]
机构
[1] Vaal Univ Technol, Dept Elect Engn, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa
[2] Stellenbosch Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Stellenbosch, South Africa
关键词
Additive manufacturing; Machine learning; Defects; ANOMALY DETECTION;
D O I
10.1108/RPJ-07-2023-0243
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Purpose - This paper aims to discuss the development of a defect classification system that can be used to detect and classify powder bed surface defects from captured layer images without the need for specialised computational hardware. The idea is to develop this system by making use of more traditional machine learning (ML) models instead of using computationally intensive deep learning (DL) models.Design/methodology/approach - The approach that is used by this study is to use traditional image processing and classification techniques that can be applied to captured layer images to detect and classify defects without the need for DL algorithms.Findings - The study proved that a defect classification algorithm could be developed by making use of traditional ML models with a high degree of accuracy and the images could be processed at higher speeds than typically reported in literature when making use of DL models.Originality/value - This paper addresses a need that has been identified for a high-speed defect classification algorithm that can detect and classify defects without the need for specialised hardware that is typically used when making use of DL technologies. This is because when developing closed-loop feedback systems for these additive manufacturing machines, it is important to detect and classify defects without inducing additional delays to the control system.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 154
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Defect Classification for Additive Manufacturing with Machine Learning
    Altmann, Mika Leon
    Benthien, Thiemo
    Ellendt, Nils
    Toenjes, Anastasiya
    MATERIALS, 2023, 16 (18)
  • [32] Comparative Analysis of Classical Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods for Fruit Image Recognition and Classification
    Salim, Nareen O. M.
    Mohammed, Ahmed Khorsheed
    TRAITEMENT DU SIGNAL, 2024, 41 (03) : 1331 - 1343
  • [33] Exploration of Machine Learning Techniques for Defect Classification
    Prakash, B. V. Ajay
    Ashoka, D. V.
    Aradya, V. N. Manjunath
    COMPUTING AND NETWORK SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 12 : 145 - 153
  • [34] Steel Defect Classification Using Machine Learning
    Arshad, Syeda Rabia
    Obaid, Ishwa
    Gull, Rameesha
    Shahzad, Muhammad Khuram
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UBIQUITOUS INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATION (IMCOM 2022), 2022,
  • [35] Traditional Machine Learning Methods versus Deep Learning for Meningioma Classification, Grading, Outcome Prediction, and Segmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Maniar, Krish M.
    Lassaren, Philipp
    Rana, Aakanksha
    Yao, Yuxin
    Tewarie, Ishaan A.
    Gerstl, Jakob V. E.
    Blanco, Camila M. Recio
    Power, Liam H.
    Mammi, Marco
    Mattie, Heather
    Smith, Timothy R.
    Mekary, Rania A.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 179 : E119 - E134
  • [36] Deep Learning in Heart Murmur Detection: Analyzing the Potential of FCNN vs. Traditional Machine Learning Models
    Hussein, Hajer Sayed
    Albazar, Hussein
    Mallouhy, Roxane Elias
    Al-Hebshi, Fatima
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2025, 16 (02) : 1296 - 1304
  • [37] Predicting E-commerce customer satisfaction: Traditional machine learning vs. deep learning approaches
    Zaghloul, Maha
    Barakat, Sherif
    Rezk, Amira
    JOURNAL OF RETAILING AND CONSUMER SERVICES, 2024, 79
  • [38] Mapping Landslides on EO Data: Performance of Deep Learning Models vs. Traditional Machine Learning Models
    Prakash, Nikhil
    Manconi, Andrea
    Loew, Simon
    REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (03)
  • [39] Comparative Evaluation of Network-Based Intrusion Detection: Deep Learning vs Traditional Machine Learning Approach
    Udurume, Miracle
    Shakhov, Vladimir
    Koo, Insoo
    2024 FIFTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UBIQUITOUS AND FUTURE NETWORKS, ICUFN 2024, 2024, : 520 - 525
  • [40] Load Forecasting with Machine Learning and Deep Learning Methods
    Cordeiro-Costas, Moises
    Villanueva, Daniel
    Eguia-Oller, Pablo
    Martinez-Comesana, Miguel
    Ramos, Sergio
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (13):