Applying AI to digital archives: trust, collaboration and shared professional ethics

被引:15
|
作者
Jaillant, Lise [1 ]
Rees, Arran [2 ]
机构
[1] Loughborough Univ, Sch Social Sci & Humanities, Loughborough, Leics, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Sch Fine Art Hist Art & Cultural Studies, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
D O I
10.1093/llc/fqac073
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Policy makers produce digital records on a daily basis. A selection of records is then preserved in archival repositories. However, getting access to these archival materials is extremely complicated for many reasons-including data protection, sensitivity, national security, and copyright. Artificial Intelligence (AI) can be applied to archives to make them more accessible, but it is still at an experimental stage. While skills gaps contribute to keeping archives 'dark', it is also essential to examine issues of mistrust and miscommunication. This article argues that although civil servants, archivists, and academics have similar professional principles articulated through professional codes of ethics, these are not often communicated to each other. This lack of communication leads to feelings of mistrust between stakeholders. Mistrust of technology also contributes to the barriers to effective implementation of AI tools. Therefore, we propose that surfacing the shared professional ethics between stakeholders can contribute to deeper collaborations between humans. In turn, these collaborations can lead to the building of trust in AI systems and tools. The research is informed by semi-structured interviews with thirty government professionals, archivists, historians, digital humanists, and computer scientists. Previous research has largely focused on preservation of digital records, rather than access to these records, and on archivists rather than records creators such as government professionals. This article is the first to examine the application of AI to digital archives as an issue that requires trust and collaboration across the entire archival circle (from record creators to archivists, and from archivists to users).
引用
收藏
页码:571 / 585
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Designing trust: The formation of employees? trust in conversational AI in the digital workplace
    Gkinko, Lorentsa
    Elbanna, Amany
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2023, 158
  • [32] How to Build Digital Trust in Ai With a Robust Ai Governance Framework
    Lee, Carol
    Law, Terence
    Huang, Tom
    Lam, Lanis
    ISACA Journal, 2024, 3 : 44 - 50
  • [33] Collaboration in a professional ethics program between a professional association and a university: an experience in Mexico
    Gallardo, Yurixhi
    Romero, Alexa Guadalupe Torres
    REVISTA DE EDUCACION Y DERECHO-EDUCATIONAL AND LAW REVIEW, 2021, (01): : 333 - 352
  • [34] The Road to a Successful HRI: AI, Trust and ethicS (TRAITS) Workshop
    Rossi, Alessandra
    Rossi, Silvia
    Andriella, Antonio
    van Maris, Anouk
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 17TH ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION (HRI '22), 2022, : 1284 - 1286
  • [35] Correction to: Philosophical foundations for digital ethics and AI Ethics: a dignitarian approach
    Robert Hanna
    Emre Kazim
    AI and Ethics, 2022, 2 (1): : 251 - 251
  • [36] Professional ethics and practice in archives and records management in a human rights context
    Cook, Michael
    JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF ARCHIVISTS, 2006, 27 (01): : 1 - 15
  • [37] Applying Privacy as Trust in the Emerging Digital Welfare State
    Huang, Yi-Chen
    NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, 2023, 18 : 97 - 124
  • [38] Academic ethics problems and materials on professional conduct and shared governance
    Williams, DE
    JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP, 2003, 29 (06): : 416 - 417
  • [39] Academic ethics: Problems and materials on professional conduct and shared governance
    Gerber, L
    ACADEME-BULLETIN OF THE AAUP, 2003, 89 (06): : 82 - 84
  • [40] AI-teaming: Redefining collaboration in the digital era
    Schmutz, Jan B.
    Outland, Neal
    Kerstan, Sophie
    Georganta, Eleni
    Ulfert, Anna -Sophie
    CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 58