Can capital markets identify heterogeneous environmental investment strategies of firms? Evidence from China

被引:3
|
作者
Cheng, Hongwei [1 ]
Feng, Yi [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Wangjiang Campus,24 South Sect 1 Yihuan Rd, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China
关键词
Environmental investment strategy; Threshold model; Capital market; Green pricing; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; TEXTUAL ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; INNOVATION; GREEN; RISK; PAY;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-023-26428-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Using a 2005-2020 sample of A-share listed companies in China's heavily polluting industries, this paper divides environmental investment strategies into "light green," "medium green," and "deep green" dimensions and constructs a panel threshold model to investigate the impact of different environmental strategies on China's stock market. The study found that environmental investment intensity has a double threshold effect on stock returns, "medium green" behavior helps improve stock returns, and "light green" and "deep green" behaviors are not conducive to stock returns. Institutional investors are more accurate than ordinary investors in identifying heterogeneous environmental strategies. The mechanism test shows that different environmental strategies affect stock returns through internal "value enhancement" and external "government subsidy" mechanisms. Moreover, "greenwashing" benefits for companies are short-lived; the market eventually imposes punitive pricing. These findings provide a reference for enterprise- and market-oriented green development systems.
引用
收藏
页码:58253 / 58275
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Internal capital markets and investment policy: evidence from corporate spinoffs
    Ahn, S
    Denis, DJ
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 71 (03) : 489 - 516
  • [22] Human capital and investment performance of venture capital firms mediating and moderating effects of investment strategies
    Li, Yan
    Zhuang, Xin-Tian
    Luo, Guo-Feng
    Ma, Shi-Mei
    Dongbei Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Northeastern University, 2012, 33 (11): : 1660 - 1663
  • [23] Can the government environmental audits improve corporate green investment? Evidence from China
    Sun, Lipeng
    Luo, Kaikai
    Zhou, Chaobo
    Yan, Jiale
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2025, 97
  • [24] Can fintech promote environmental investment in heavily polluting enterprises? evidence from China
    Zhang, Xiao
    Zhao, Yu
    Liu, Xiaoyu
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2024, 12
  • [25] Can digital investment improve corporate environmental performance?-- Empirical evidence from China
    Jin, Xin
    Lei, Xue
    Wu, Wanxuan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 414
  • [26] Can environmental tax improve the environmental investment? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Bingnan Guo
    Weizhe Feng
    Yisha Yu
    Hao Zhang
    Feng Hu
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 113846 - 113858
  • [27] Can environmental tax improve the environmental investment? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Guo, Bingnan
    Feng, Weizhe
    Yu, Yisha
    Zhang, Hao
    Hu, Feng
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (53) : 113846 - 113858
  • [28] The rise of market power and firms' investment: Evidence from China
    Zheng, Bowen
    Zhang, Mengjie
    Zhang, Xuefang
    ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2022, 62 (05): : 4807 - 4830
  • [29] Can Social Capital Drive Economic Growth and Environmental Protection?-Evidence from China
    Wan, Jianxiang
    Wan, Haiyan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2016, 66
  • [30] The capital investment channel of environmental improvement: evidence from BRICS
    Mesagan, Ekundayo P.
    Isola, Wakeel A.
    Ajide, Kazeem B.
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 21 (04) : 1561 - 1582