Effect of static weight errors on Weigh-in-Motion (WIM) system accuracy

被引:13
|
作者
Masud, Muhammad Munum [1 ]
Haider, Syed W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Civil & Environm Engn Dept, 428 S Shaw Lane,Room 3546, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
Sensors; Weigh -in -Motion (WIM); Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW); WIM equipment calibration; Bending plate; Quartz piezo; PAVEMENT; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.measurement.2022.112301
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Weigh-in-Motion (WIM) systems require calibration to account for site conditions and regular calibrations (once or twice a year) to yield accurate and consistent loading data. Generally, the WIM system calibration compares the WIM weights with the reference static weights. However, the ground truth (static weights) accuracy may not be known and is uncertain. WIM protocols (ASTM 1318-09 and COST-323) specify the static error thresholds. Therefore, it is crucial to consider the errors induced due to static weighing procedures during the WIM equipment calibration and pre-validation. This paper uses the long-term pavement performance (LTPP) highquality WIM data to study the effect of static weight measurement errors on the performance of the WIM system. The data analyses address two key concerns (a) modeling gross vehicle weight (GVW) errors while accounting for errors in the static and WIM weights, and (2) quantifying the effect of static truck weight errors for a variety of WIM sites with varying performance levels. The results show that the static weight errors are more critical for the WIM sites marginally meeting the desired ASTM 1318-09 accuracy class. A 2% static error may not change the overall performance of a WIM site (ASTM accuracy class based on tolerance limits), especially the sites with negligible bias or significantly higher bias. However, the ASTM accuracy class can change from higher to lower for WIM sites with intermediate bias (3 to 7%), even with a 1% increase in static weight errors.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Integration of Weigh-in-Motion (WIM) and inductive signature data for truck body classification
    Hernandez, Sarah V.
    Tok, Andre
    Ritchie, Stephen G.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2016, 68 : 1 - 21
  • [32] Investigation of the Effect of Weight Factor on Performance of Piezoelectric Weigh-in-Motion Sensors
    Vaziri, Shahram Hashemi
    Haas, Carl T.
    Rothenburg, Leo
    Haas, Ralph C.
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, 2013, 139 (09) : 913 - 922
  • [33] Accuracy Maps of Weigh-In-Motion Systems for Direct Enforcement
    Gajda, Janusz
    Burnos, Piotr
    Sroka, Ryszard
    Daniol, Mateusz
    ELECTRONICS, 2023, 12 (07)
  • [34] Improved accuracy and robustness of bridge weigh-in-motion systems
    Znidaric, Ales
    Kalin, Jan
    Kreslin, Maja
    STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2018, 14 (04) : 412 - 424
  • [35] Bridge weigh-in-motion system development using static truck/bridge models
    Leming, SK
    Stalford, HL
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2002 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-6, 2002, 1-6 : 3672 - 3677
  • [36] High Accuracy Weigh-In-Motion Systems for Direct Enforcement
    Burnos, Piotr
    Gajda, Janusz
    Sroka, Ryszard
    Wasilewska, Monika
    Dolega, Cezary
    SENSORS, 2021, 21 (23)
  • [37] Estimation of Weigh-in-Motion System Accuracy from Axle Load Spectra Data
    Masud, M. Munum
    Haider, Syed Waqar
    AIRFIELD AND HIGHWAY PAVEMENTS 2021: PAVEMENT MATERIALS AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, : 378 - 388
  • [38] Methodological Study on the Influence of Truck Driving State on the Accuracy of Weigh-in-Motion System
    Zhao, Shuanfeng
    Yang, Jianwei
    Tang, Zenghui
    Li, Qing
    Xing, Zhizhong
    INFORMATION, 2022, 13 (03)
  • [39] Adaptive weigh-in-motion algorithms for truck weight enforcement
    Han, Lee D.
    Ko, Sung-Seok
    Gu, Zhongren
    Jeong, Myong K.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2012, 24 : 256 - 269
  • [40] Method for Identifying Truck Traffic Site Clustering Using Weigh-in-Motion (WIM) Data
    Liu, Dan
    Deng, Zhenghong
    Wang, Yinhai
    Kaisar, Evangelos I.
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 136750 - 136759