Cardiometabolic Phenotyping in Heart Failure: Differences between Patients with Reduced vs. Preserved Ejection Fraction

被引:2
|
作者
Balletti, Alessio [1 ]
De Biase, Nicolo [1 ]
Del Punta, Lavinia [1 ]
Filidei, Francesco [1 ]
Armenia, Silvia [1 ]
Masi, Filippo [1 ]
Di Fiore, Valerio [1 ]
Mazzola, Matteo [2 ]
Bacca, Alessandra [1 ]
Dini, Frank L. [3 ]
Taddei, Stefano [1 ]
Masi, Stefano [1 ]
Pugliese, Nicola Riccardo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, Dept Clin & Expt Med, I-56126 Pisa, Italy
[2] Univ Pisa, Dept Pathol, Cardiol Div, I-56124 Pisa, Italy
[3] Sant Agostino Med Ctr, I-20127 Milan, Italy
关键词
heart failure; inflammation; congestion; cardiometabolism; INFLAMMATION; MECHANISMS; MORTALITY; INSIGHTS; STRESS; INDEX;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics13040790
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims. We explored multiple cardiometabolic patterns, including inflammatory and congestive pathways, in patients with heart failure (HF). Methods and Results. We enrolled 270 HF patients with reduced (<50%, HFrEF; n = 96) and preserved (>= 50%, HFpEF; n = 174) ejection fraction. In HFpEF, glycated hemoglobin (Hb1Ac) seemed to be relevant in its relationship with inflammation as Hb1Ac positively correlated with high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP; Spearman's rank correlation coefficient rho = 0.180, p < 0.05). In HFrEF, we found a correlation between Hb1Ac and norepinephrine (rho = 0.207, p < 0.05). In HFpEF, we found a positive correlation between Hb1Ac and congestion expressed as pulmonary B lines (rho = 0.187, p < 0.05); the inverse correlation, although not significant, was found in HFrEF between Hb1Ac and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (rho = 0.079) and between Hb1Ac and B lines (rho = -0.051). In HFrEF, we found a positive correlation between E/e' ratio and Hb1Ac (rho = 0.203, p < 0.05) and a negative correlation between tricuspid annular systolic excursion (TAPSE)/echocardiographically measured systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) (TAPSE/sPAP ratio) (rho = -0.205, p < 0.05) and Hb1Ac. In HFpEF, we found a negative correlation between TAPSE/sPAP ratio and uric acid (rho = -0.216, p < 0.05). Conclusion. In HF patients, HFpEF and HFrEF phenotypes are characterized by different cardiometabolic indices related to distinct inflammatory and congestive pathways. Patients with HFpEF showed an important relationship between inflammatory and cardiometabolic parameters. Conversely, in HFrEF, there is a significant relationship between congestion and inflammation, while cardiometabolism appears not to influence inflammation, instead affecting sympathetic hyperactivation.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Heart Failure Preserved Ejection Fraction Patients Benefit From Heart Failure Reduced Ejection Fraction Guidelines
    Steahr, Gregg
    Kelly, Linda
    Moore, Meredith
    Hott, Brenda
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2015, 21 (08) : S73 - S74
  • [42] Mortality and Readmissions in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction versus Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
    Carcora, Yaser
    Gravely, Amy
    Tholakanahalli, Venkatakrishna N.
    Adabag, Selcuk
    CIRCULATION, 2021, 144
  • [43] Sex differences in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
    Van Linthout, SSophie
    Kasner, M.
    Zietsch, C.
    Miteva, K.
    Lopez, B.
    Schultheiss, H. P.
    Diez, J.
    Tschoepe, C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2014, 16 : 120 - 121
  • [44] Comparison Of Hospital Outcomes Between Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction And Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Among Patients With Anemia
    Mir, Junaid
    AL Ahmad, Majd
    Khalil, Ayesha
    AL Ahmad, Anas
    Malik, Adnan
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2025, 31 (01)
  • [45] Prognostic differences between heart failure with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction in people with COPD
    Gulea, Claudia
    Zakeri, Rosita
    Quint, Jennifer K.
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2021, 58
  • [46] Statins Beneficial for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction But Not Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction?
    Ohte, Nobuyuki
    Little, William C.
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2015, 79 (03) : 508 - 509
  • [47] Association of physical activity and heart failure with preserved vs. reduced ejection fraction in the elderly: the Framingham Heart Study
    Kraigher-Krainer, Elisabeth
    Lyass, Asya
    Massaro, Joseph M.
    Lee, Douglas S.
    Ho, Jennifer E.
    Levy, Daniel
    Kannel, William B.
    Vasan, Ramachandran S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2013, 15 (07) : 742 - 746
  • [48] Congestive heart failure in the elderly: Comparison between reduced ejection fraction and preserved ejection fraction
    Satomura, Hajime
    Wada, Hiroshi
    Sakakura, Kenichi
    Kubo, Norifumi
    Ikeda, Nahoko
    Sugawara, Yoshitaka
    Ako, Junya
    Momomura, Shin-ichi
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 59 (02) : 215 - 219
  • [49] Proteomics to improve phenotyping in obese patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
    Kresoja, Karl-Patrik
    Rommel, Karl-Philipp
    Wachter, Rolf
    Henger, Sylvia
    Besler, Christian
    Kloeting, Nora
    Schnelle, Moritz
    Hoffmann, Anne
    Buettner, Petra
    Ceglarek, Uta
    Thiele, Holger
    Scholz, Markus
    Edelmann, Frank
    Blueher, Matthias
    Lurz, Philipp
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2021, 23 (10) : 1633 - 1644
  • [50] Is there a difference in precipitants between heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFREF)?
    Ali, S. M.
    Easton, K.
    Peck, K. Y.
    Hare, J.
    Kaye, D.
    Parikh, S.
    Hopper, I.
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL ON AGEING, 2018, 37 : 37 - 38