DNA repair deficiency as circulating biomarker in prostate cancer

被引:12
|
作者
Catalano, Martina [1 ]
Generali, Daniele [2 ]
Gatti, Marta [3 ]
Riboli, Barbara [3 ]
Paganini, Leda [3 ]
Nesi, Gabriella [4 ]
Roviello, Giandomenico [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florence, Sch Human Hlth Sci, Florence, Italy
[2] Univ Trieste, Cattinara Hosp Trieste, Dept Med Surg & Hlth Sci, Trieste, Italy
[3] Azienda Socio Sanit Territoriale ASST Cremona, Serv Citogenet & Genet, Cremona, Italy
[4] Univ Florence, Dept Hlth Sci, Florence, Italy
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2023年 / 13卷
关键词
DNA damage repair; prostate cancer; liquid biopsy; circulating biomarker; circulating tumor DNA; CELL-FREE DNA; MICROSATELLITE INSTABILITY; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; MISMATCH-REPAIR; LIQUID BIOPSY; DOUBLE-BLIND; PATIENTS PTS; TUMOR DNA; DAMAGE; MUTATIONS;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2023.1115241
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Deleterious aberrations in DNA repair genes are actionable in approximately 25% of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers (mCRPC) patients. Homology recombination repair (HRR) is the DNA damage repair (DDR) mechanism most frequently altered in prostate cancer; of note BRCA2 is the most frequently altered DDR gene in this tumor. Poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors showed antitumor activity with a improvement in overall survival in mCRPC carrying somatic and/or germline alterations of HHR. Germline mutations are tested on peripheral blood samples using DNA extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes, while the somatic alterations are assessed by extracting DNA from a tumor tissue sample. However, each of these genetic tests have some limitations: the somatic tests are related to the sample availability and tumor heterogeneity, while the germline testing are mainly related to the inability to detect somatic HRR mutations. Therefore, the liquid biopsy, a non-invasive and easily repeatable test compared to tissue test, could identified somatic mutation detected on the circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) extracted from a plasma. This approach should better represent the heterogeneity of the tumor compared to the primary biopsy and maybe helpful in monitoring the onset of potential mutations involved in treatment resistance. Furthermore, ctDNA may inform about timing and potential cooperation of multiple driver genes aberration guiding the treatment options in patients with mCRPC. However, the clinical use of ctDNA test in prostate cancer compared to blood and tissue testing are currently very limited. In this review, we summarize the current therapeutic indications in prostate cancer patients with DDR deficiency, the recommendation for germline and somatic-genomic testing in advanced PC and the advantages of the use liquid biopsy in clinical routine for mCRPC.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Targeting DNA repair defects in prostate cancer
    Clemens Thoma
    Nature Reviews Urology, 2020, 17 : 432 - 432
  • [42] Targeting defective DNA repair in prostate cancer
    Carmichael, Juliet
    Maza, Maria de los Dolores Fenor de la
    Rescigno, Pasquale
    Chandran, Khobe
    de Bono, Johann
    CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 32 (05) : 503 - 509
  • [43] Circulating Tumor DNA Testing for Homology Recombination Repair Genes in Prostate Cancer: From the Lab to the Clinic
    Cimadamore, Alessia
    Cheng, Liang
    Massari, Francesco
    Santoni, Matteo
    Pepi, Laura
    Franzese, Carmine
    Scarpelli, Marina
    Lopez-Beltran, Antonio
    Galosi, Andrea Benedetto
    Montironi, Rodolfo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2021, 22 (11)
  • [44] Early Plasma Circulating Tumor DNA as a Potential Biomarker of Disease Recurrence in Non-metastatic Prostate Cancer
    Fei, Xiaochen
    Du, Xinxing
    Gong, Yiming
    Liu, Jiazhou
    Fan, Liancheng
    Wang, Jiayi
    Wang, Yanqing
    Zhu, Yinjie
    Pan, Jiahua
    Dong, Baijun
    Xue, Wei
    CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2023, 55 (03): : 969 - 977
  • [45] Circulating Cell-Free DNA as Biomarker of Taxane Resistance in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
    Francini, Edoardo
    Ou, Fang-Shu
    Rhoades, Justin
    Wolfe, Eric G.
    O'Connor, Edward P.
    Ha, Gavin
    Gydush, Gregory
    Kelleher, Kaitlin M.
    Bhatt, Rupal S.
    Balk, Steven P.
    Sweeney, Christopher J.
    Adalsteinsson, Viktor A.
    Taplin, Mary-Ellen
    Choudhury, Atish D.
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (16)
  • [46] DNA repair as a biomarker
    Collins, Andrew R.
    Ferguson, Lynnette R.
    MUTATION RESEARCH-FUNDAMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF MUTAGENESIS, 2012, 736 (1-2) : 2 - 4
  • [47] Detection of Mutant Circulating Free DNA as a Biomarker of Colorectal Cancer
    Asiri, A. A.
    Hassall, J. H.
    Ham-Karim, H. H. K.
    Ebili, H. E.
    Fadhil, W. F.
    Ng, O. N.
    Fardouly, P. F.
    Acheson, A. A.
    Ilyas, M. I.
    JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2017, 243 : S25 - S25
  • [48] Plasma circulating tumor DNA as a genomic biomarker for ovarian cancer
    Nanki, Y.
    George, A. M.
    Chen, Y.
    Brueffer, C.
    Hirasawa, A.
    Chiyoda, T.
    Akahane, T.
    Aoki, D.
    Saal, L. H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2019, 27 : 1670 - 1671
  • [49] Epigenetic markers of prostate cancer in plasma circulating DNA
    Cortese, Rene
    Kwan, Andrew
    Lalonde, Emilie
    Bryzgunova, Olga
    Bondar, Anna
    Wu, Ying
    Gordevicius, Juozas
    Park, Mina
    Oh, Gabriel
    Kaminsky, Zachary
    Tverkuviene, Justina
    Laurinavicius, Arvydas
    Jankevicius, Feliksas
    Sendorek, Dorota H. S.
    Haider, Syed
    Wang, Sun-Chong
    Jarmalaite, Sonata
    Laktionov, Pavel
    Boutros, Paul C.
    Petronis, Arturas
    HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS, 2012, 21 (16) : 3619 - 3631
  • [50] Circulating tumor DNA and metastatic breast cancer: a biomarker for the future?
    Goncalves, Anthony
    BULLETIN DU CANCER, 2013, 100 (10) : 935 - 936