Taking PI-QUAL beyond the prostate: Towards a standardized radiological image quality score (RI-QUAL)

被引:5
|
作者
Becker, Anton S. [1 ,2 ,7 ]
Giganti, Francesco [3 ,4 ]
Purysko, Andrei S. [5 ]
Fainberg, Jonathan [6 ]
Vargas, Hebert Alberto [1 ,2 ]
Woo, Sungmin [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY USA
[2] NYU Langone, Dept Radiol, New York, NY USA
[3] Univ Coll London Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Radiol, London, England
[4] UCL, Div Surg & Intervent Sci, London, England
[5] Cleveland Clin, Dept Radiol, Abdominal Imaging Sect, Cleveland, OH USA
[6] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, New York, NY USA
[7] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10065 USA
关键词
Health care operations; Quality control; Quality assurance; Prostate MRI; Standardized reporting; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110955
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the interreader agreement of a novel quality score, called the Radiological Image Quality Score (RI-QUAL), to a slighly modified version of the existing Prostate Imaging Quality (mPI-QUAL) score for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate. Methods: A total of 43 consecutive scans were evaluated by two subspecialized radiologists who assigned scores using both the RI-QUAL and mPI-QUAL methods. The interreader agreement was analyzed using three statistical methods: concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Cohen's kappa. Time needed to arrive at a quality judgment was measured and compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results: The interreader agreement for RI-QUAL and mPI-QUAL scores was comparable, as evidenced by the high CCC (0.76 vs. 0.77, p = 0.93), ICC (0.86 vs. 0.87, p = 0.93), and moderate Cohen's kappa (0.61 vs. 0.64, p = 0.85) values. Moreover, RI-QUAL assessment was faster than mPI-QUAL (19 vs. 40 s, p = 0.001). Conclusion: RI-QUAL is a new quality score that has comparable interreader agreement to the mPI-QUAL score, but with the potential to be applied to different MRI protocols and even different modalities. Like PI-QUAL, RIQUAL may also facilitate communication about quality to referring physicians, as it provides a standardized and easily interpretable score. Further studies are warranted to validate the usefulness of RI-QUAL in larger patient cohorts and for other imaging modalities.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [31] MA-QC: Free online software for prostate MR quality control and PI-QUAL assessment
    Sabbah, M.
    Gutierrez, P.
    Puech, P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 167
  • [32] PI-QUAL version 2 image quality categorisation and inter-reader agreement compared to version 1
    Lee, Kang-Lung
    Caglic, Iztok
    Liao, Po-Hsiang
    Kessler, Dimitri A.
    Guo, Chao-Yu
    Barrett, Tristan
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024,
  • [33] Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL): A New Quality Control Scoring System for Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate from the PRECISION trial
    Giganti, Francesco
    Allen, Clare
    Emberton, Mark
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2020, 3 (05): : 615 - 619
  • [34] Why quality matters in prostate-MR images: implementing PI-QUAL v2 for improved diagnosis and research
    Barentsz, Jelle
    Thijssen, Linda
    Moore, Caroline
    de Rooij, Maarten
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2025,
  • [35] Prostate MR image quality of apparent diffusion coefficient maps versus fractional intracellular volume maps from VERDICT MRI using the PI-QUAL score and a dedicated Likert scale for artefacts
    Singh, Saurabh
    Giganti, Francesco
    Dickinson, Louise
    Rogers, Harriet
    Kanber, Baris
    Clemente, Joey
    Pye, Hayley
    Heavey, Susan
    Stopka-Farooqui, Urszula
    Johnston, Edward W.
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Freeman, Alex
    Whitaker, Hayley C.
    Alexander, Daniel C.
    Panagiotaki, Eleftheria
    Punwani, Shonit
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 168
  • [36] Inter-reader agreement of the Prostate Imaging Quality (PI-QUAL) scoring system: A two-reader, two-centre study
    Giannarini, G.
    Girometti, R.
    Zichichi, C.
    Blandino, A.
    Ficarra, V
    Bertolotto, M.
    Zuiani, C.
    Valotto, C.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 81 : S719 - S719
  • [37] 3.0 T prostate MRI: Visual assessment of 2D and 3D T2-weighted imaging sequences using PI-QUAL score
    Brillat-Savarin, Nina
    Wu, Carine
    Aupin, Laurene
    Thoumin, Camille
    Hamzaoui, Dimitri
    Renard-Penna, Raphaele
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 166
  • [38] Image quality comparison of 1.5T and 3T prostate MRIs of the same post-hip arthroplasty patients: multi-rater assessments including PI-QUAL version 2
    Nakai, Hirotsugu
    Takahashi, Naoki
    Sugi, Mark D.
    Wellnitz, Clinton V.
    Thompson, Cole P.
    Kawashima, Akira
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 49 (11) : 3913 - 3924