Intravenous Liposomal Amphotericin B Efficacy and Safety for Cutaneous and Mucosal Leishmaniasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Chivinski, Jeffrey [1 ]
Nathan, Keren [2 ]
Naeem, Faheel [3 ,4 ]
Ekmekjian, Taline [5 ]
Libman, Michael D. [3 ,4 ,6 ,8 ]
Barkati, Sapha [3 ,4 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Univ Montreal, Dept Med, Div Dermatol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Hlth Ctr, Dept Pediat, Div Infect Dis, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, JD MacLean Ctr Trop Dis, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Hlth Ctr, Res Inst, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] McGill Univ, Hlth Ctr, Med Lib, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[6] McGill Univ, Hlth Ctr, Dept Med, Div Infect Dis, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[7] McGill Univ, JD MacLean Ctr Trop Dis, 1001 Blvd Decarie, Montreal, PQ H4A 3J1, Canada
[8] McGill Univ, MacLean Ctr Trop Dis, 1001 Blvd Decarie, Montreal, PQ H4A 3J1, Canada
来源
OPEN FORUM INFECTIOUS DISEASES | 2023年 / 10卷 / 07期
关键词
Leishmania spp; migrants; tegumentary leishmaniasis; travel medicine; travelers; VISCERAL LEISHMANIASIS; MILTEFOSINE; DIAGNOSIS; TRAVELERS; AMBISOME;
D O I
10.1093/ofid/ofad348
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background Tegumentary leishmaniasis is often subject to limited funding, underpowered studies, and a paucity of high-quality interventional studies. Intravenous liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) has been increasingly used to treat cutaneous and mucosal leishmaniasis (CL and ML, respectively) despite the lack of well-conducted interventional studies. We conducted a systematic review to consolidate the descriptive evidence on the efficacy and safety of L-AmB in treating CL and ML. Methods Several online databases and the reference lists of included studies were searched to extract data from 132 studies comprising both case reports and case series. The population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and study design strategy and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used. Results Of 132 studies included, 92 were case reports and 40 were case series. Of the 92 cases, 65 (82.3%) were considered cured after receiving L-AmB as part of their treatment regimen. Twenty-one of the 92 (22.8%) cases reported adverse reactions to L-AmB. A pooled cure rate of 87.0% (95% CI, 79.0%-92.0%) was reported for the 38 case series that reported on treatment efficacy; 40.7% of the cases were associated with an adverse reaction. Conclusions Observational data on cure rates using L-AmB suggest efficacy between 80% and 90%, similar to rates reported for other antileishmanial drugs. The highest efficacy rates were observed when a single cycle of L-AmB was administered to patients with mild-moderate CL and ML. The limitations of this study include the heterogeneity observed among the included studies and the increased likelihood of publication bias associated with the inclusion of case reports and case series. This systematic review further illustrates the need for high-quality comparative trials of intravenous L-AmB for the treatment of tegumentary leishmaniasis.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Efficacy of Liposomal Bupivacaine in Thoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Gong, Ruisong
    Tan, Gang
    Huang, Yuguang
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2024, 17 : 4039 - 4051
  • [42] Efficacy and safety of vesatolimod in chronic hepatitis B: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Omer, Ibrahim
    Abuthiyab, Noorah
    Al-Omari, Basil
    Aletani, Tala
    Betar, Manar
    Alzaid, Nura
    Hakami, Alqassem Y.
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (16) : E33609
  • [43] Efficacy of Intralesional Amphotericin B for the Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis
    Goyonlo, Vahid Mashayekhi
    Vosoughi, Elham
    Kiafar, Bita
    Nahidi, Yalda
    Momenzadeh, Akram
    Taheri, Ahmad Reza
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2014, 59 (06) : 631
  • [44] Efficacy and safety of tigecycline: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yahav, Dafna
    Lador, Adi
    Paul, Mical
    Leibovici, Leonard
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2011, 66 (09) : 1963 - 1971
  • [45] Efficacy and safety of seprafilm: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mohri, Yasuhiko
    Kusunoki, Masato
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 32 (08) : 1886 - 1887
  • [46] Efficacy and safety of bromelain: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Leelakanok, Nattawut
    Petchsomrit, Arpa
    Janurai, Thitapa
    Saechan, Charinrat
    Sunsandee, Niti
    NUTRITION AND HEALTH, 2023, 29 (03) : 479 - 503
  • [47] Efficacy and safety of cefepime: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yahav, Dafna
    Paul, Mical
    Fraser, Abigail
    Sarid, Nadav
    Leibovici, Leonard
    LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2007, 7 (05): : 338 - 348
  • [48] Efficacy and Safety of Seprafilm: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yasuhiko Mohri
    Masato Kusunoki
    World Journal of Surgery, 2008, 32 : 1886 - 1887
  • [49] Efficacy and safety of daptomycin: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Teresa Rosanova, Maria
    Bes, David
    Serrano-Aguilar, Pedro
    Sberna, Norma
    Herrera-Ramos, Estefania
    Luis Lede, Roberto
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2019, 6
  • [50] Efficacy and safety of ceftaroline: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rosanova, Maria T.
    Aguilar, Pedro S.
    Sberna, Norma
    Lede, Roberto
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2018, 6