Critical decisions: A mixed-methods study of decision-making among diverse gynecologic cancer patients considering therapeutic clinical trial enrollment

被引:0
|
作者
Rieder, Stephanie Margrit [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Burgess, Ellen
Rutledge, Teresa [1 ]
Sussman, Andrew [2 ]
Boyce, Tawny
Pankratz, Vernon Shane
Kano, Miria [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Mexico, Canc Control & Populat Sci, Comprehens Canc Ctr, Albuquerque, NM USA
[2] Univ New Mexico, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, Albuquerque, NM USA
[3] Univ New Mexico, Dept Family & Community Med, Albuquerque, NM USA
[4] Univ New Mexico, Dept Internal Med, Sch Med, Albuquerque, NM USA
[5] 2325 Camino Salud NE, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
关键词
Gynecologic cancers; Health disparities; Clinical trials; Qualitative research; Intersectionality; Precarity; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDATION; PARTICIPATION; VERSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.01.031
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. Participation in therapeutic clinical trials does not reflect the diversity of gynecologic cancer patients, limiting access to novel therapeutics and generalizability of results. Reasons for inequities in participation among historically underrepresented populations remain undertheorized, as studies have shown equal willingness to participate among groups. We sought to apply a precarity framework to conceptualize the factors that impact patients' desire to enroll, to improve equity in gynecologic oncology clinical trial participation. Methods. Gynecologic cancer patients at a single tertiary care facility in the Southwestern United States who discussed participation in therapeutic clinical trial with their oncology provider from 2020 to 2021 were identified. Enrolled participants completed surveys and qualitative interviews regarding treatment experiences and decision -making. Oncology providers completed parallel surveys at the time of their patient's enrollment. Descriptive statistics and thematic coding were used to analyze data. Results. 30 patients were enrolled and participated in surveys and interviews. No differences were found in quantitative data assessing shared decision -making and patient -centered communication between those who enrolled and those who did not. Qualitative data demonstrated that patients who declined trial enrollment expressed concerns regarding uncertainty and loss of control, independence in decision -making, and significant resource challenges and financial toxicity of cancer treatment. Conclusions. We identified a constellation of factors that contribute to desire to enroll in clinical trials, that we describe using the framework of precarity. Through identification of precarious patients and mitigation of burdens, we anticipate improved enrollment and retention in therapeutic clinical trials among diverse gynecologic oncology patients. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 110
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Development of a Mechanical Ventilation Decision-making Information Sheet for Surrogates of Patients With Advanced Dementia: A Pragmatic Mixed-methods Study
    Singh, R.
    Golden, S.
    Disher, N.
    Teno, J.
    Vranas, K. C.
    Sullivan, D. R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 209
  • [42] Gastrostomy uptake in motor neurone disease: a mixed-methods study of patients' decision making
    Labra, Julie
    Hogden, Anne
    Power, Emma
    James, Natalie
    Flood, Victoria M.
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (02):
  • [43] Shared decision-making needs, barriers, and facilitators of patients with newly diagnosed advanced cancer in the hospital: a multi-level, mixed-methods study
    Reyes, Kevin R.
    Wong, Paul
    Petrofsky, Mary
    Dai, Annie
    Pelayo, Alyson
    Brondfield, Sam
    Kwon, Daniel H.
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2024, 32 (05)
  • [44] Understanding PrEP decision making among pregnant women in Lilongwe, Malawi: A mixed-methods study
    Hill, Lauren M.
    Golin, Carol E.
    Saidi, Friday
    Phanga, Twambilile
    Tseka, Jennifer
    Young, Alinda
    Pearce, Lisa D.
    Maman, Suzanne
    Chi, Benjamin H.
    Mutale, Wilbroad
    JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL AIDS SOCIETY, 2022, 25 (09)
  • [45] A Mixed-Methods Study of Condom Use and Decision Making Among Adolescent Gay and Bisexual Males
    Brian Mustanski
    L. Zachary DuBois
    Tonya L. Prescott
    Michele L. Ybarra
    AIDS and Behavior, 2014, 18 : 1955 - 1969
  • [46] A Mixed-Methods Study of Condom Use and Decision Making Among Adolescent Gay and Bisexual Males
    Mustanski, Brian
    DuBois, L. Zachary
    Prescott, Tonya L.
    Ybarra, Michele L.
    AIDS AND BEHAVIOR, 2014, 18 (10) : 1955 - 1969
  • [47] Perspectives of facilitators and barriers to cancer clinical trial participation: A mixed-methods study
    Williams, Lovoria B.
    Burris, Jessica L.
    Borger, Tia N.
    Acree, Tianna
    Abufarsakh, Bassema M.
    Arnold, Susanne M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (16)
  • [48] Ability of observer and self-report measures to capture shared decision-making in clinical practice in the UK: a mixed-methods study
    Williams, Denitza
    Edwards, Adrian
    Wood, Fiona
    Lloyd, Amy
    Brain, Kate
    Thomas, Nerys
    Prichard, Alison
    Goodland, Annwen
    Sweetland, Helen
    McGarrigle, Helen
    Hill, Gwenllian
    Joseph-Williams, Natalie
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (08):
  • [49] Acceptability and Feasibility of a Shared Decision-Making Model in Work Rehabilitation: A Mixed-Methods Study of Stakeholders’ Perspectives
    Marie-France Coutu
    France Légaré
    Marie-José Durand
    Dawn Stacey
    Marie-Elise Labrecque
    Marc Corbière
    Lesley Bainbridge
    Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 2019, 29 : 128 - 139
  • [50] Exploring decision-making practices during coaching sessions in grassroots youth soccer: a mixed-methods study
    Roca, Andre
    Pocock, Chris
    Ford, Paul R.
    SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN FOOTBALL, 2024,