The ethics and epistemology of researching higher degree by research supervision: an encounter with institutional ethics review

被引:0
|
作者
Hamid, M. Obaidul [1 ,3 ]
Hanna, Barbara [1 ]
Gannaway, Deanne [1 ]
Nguyen, Trang Thi Thuy [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Sch Educ, St Lucia Campus, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
关键词
HDR supervision; ethics and HDR supervision research; epistemology and supervision research; ethics review; effective and ineffective supervision; HDR education in Australia; HIDDEN CURRICULUM;
D O I
10.1080/1743727X.2023.2299973
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article provides a reflexive account of the authors' experiences of the ethical challenges in conducting a higher degree by research (HDR) supervision project prompted by the ethics review process in a major Australian university. The authors also raise epistemological questions about the specific focus of the study, given the interrelations of ethics and epistemology. The project aimed to examine the conceptualization of 'poor supervision' by HDR actors including students and graduates with a view to informing supervision practices. The article seeks to highlight fundamental questions about what is researchable/ unresearchable from ethical as well as epistemological points of view, and who can decide on ethical norms and boundaries in this research space. As HDR education in general and HDR supervision in particular have come under increased scrutiny nationally and globally inviting more research and academic engagement, such an account may be useful in pointing to the complexity of pedagogical, epistemological, and ethical issues and their complex interactions against the processes of institutional ethics review.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 28
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Experiencing higher degree research supervision as teaching
    Bruce, Christine
    Stoodley, Ian
    STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2013, 38 (02) : 226 - 241
  • [32] Ethics review in research - Ethics committees are risk averse
    Minnis, HJ
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7441): : 710 - 711
  • [33] Sex Work Research, Ethics Review Processes, and Institutional Challenges for "Sensitive" Collaborative Research
    Ferris, Shawna
    Lebovitch, Amy
    Allard, Danielle
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2021, 20
  • [34] ETHICS IN RESEARCH: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE HIGHER EDUCATION
    de Lima, Antonio Bosco
    REVISTA IBERO-AMERICANA DE ESTUDOS EM EDUCACAO, 2016, 11 : 516 - 526
  • [35] RESEARCH ETHICS Ethics review for international data-intensive research
    Dove, Edward S.
    Townend, David
    Meslin, Eric M.
    Bobrow, Martin
    Littler, Katherine
    Nicol, Dianne
    de Vries, Jantina
    Junker, Anne
    Garattini, Chiara
    Bovenberg, Jasper
    Shabani, Mahsa
    Levesque, Emmanuelle
    Knoppers, Bartha M.
    SCIENCE, 2016, 351 (6280) : 1399 - 1400
  • [36] Ethics review in research - Role of ethics committee review is interpreted widely
    Beales, ILP
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7441): : 710 - 710
  • [37] Is it time to abandon institutional research ethics committees?
    J. Savulescu
    Monash Bioethics Review, 2002, 21 (3) : S74 - S77
  • [38] Navigating Ethics in the Digital Age: Introducing Connected and Open Research Ethics (CORE), a Tool for Researchers and Institutional Review Boards
    Torous, John
    Nebeker, Camille
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2017, 19 (02)
  • [39] Ethics Regulation in Social Computing Research: Examining the Role of Institutional Review Boards
    Vitak, Jessica
    Proferes, Nicholas
    Shilton, Katie
    Ashktorab, Zahra
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2017, 12 (05) : 372 - 382
  • [40] HOW TO DISCUSS ETHICS IN INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARDS
    BRUDERMULLER, G
    SEELMANN, K
    METHODS AND FINDINGS IN EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1992, 14 (09): : 737 - 742