Past, present and future of the applications of machine learning in soil science and hydrology

被引:13
|
作者
Wang, Xiangwei [1 ]
Yang, Yizhe [2 ]
Lv, Jianglong [1 ,3 ]
He, Hailong [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Nat Resources & Environm, Yangling, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Dept Agr & Rural Affairs Shaanxi Prov, Shaanxi Prov Farmland Qual & Agr Environm Protect, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[3] Northwest A&F Univ, Key Lab Plant Nutr & AgriEnvironm Northwest China, Minist Agr, Yangling, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
machine learning; science mapping; scientometric analysis; soil; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; OF-THE-ART; SPATIAL PREDICTION; REGRESSION; ALGORITHM; UNCERTAINTY; STABILITY; INFERENCE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.17221/94/2022-SWR
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Machine learning can handle an ever-increasing amount of data with the ability to learn models from the data. It has been widely used in a variety of disciplines and is gaining increasingly more attention nowadays. As it is challenging to map soil and hydrological information that are characterised with high spatial and temporal variability, applications of machine learning in soil science and hydrology (AMLSH) have become popularised. To better understand the current state of AMLSH research, a scientific and quantitative approach was performed to statistically analyse publication information from 1973 to 2021 archived in the Scopus database using scientometric analysis tools, including VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and the opensource R package "bibliometrix". The results show a significant increase in the number of publications on AMLSH since 2006. The major contributions were identified based on country origins (China, the USA, and India), institutions (Hohai University, Islamic Azad University, and Wuhan University), and journals (Journal of Hydrology, Remote Sensing, and Geoderma). The keywords analysis of the AMLSH research demonstrates four research hotspots: neural network, artificial intelligence, machine learning, and soil. The most frequently utilised machine learning (ML) methods are neural networks, decision trees, random forests and other methods for image processing and predictive analysis. McBratney et al. 2003 is the most highly cited article. Our research sheds light on the research process on AMLSH and concludes with future research perspectives.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 80
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The past, present and future of learning analytics
    Islind, Anna Sigridur
    Óskarsdóttir, María
    Willermark, Sara
    Deeva, Galina
    Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2021, 2020-January : 1507 - 1508
  • [42] PROGRAMMED LEARNING, PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE
    LEEDHAM, J
    PROGRAMMED LEARNING & EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 1967, 4 (03): : 231 - 231
  • [43] Reinforcement learning: Past, present and future
    Sutton, RS
    SIMULATED EVOLUTION AND LEARNING, 1999, 1585 : 195 - 197
  • [44] Distance learning - Past, present, and future
    Liu, CL
    PROCEEDINGS OF ICCE'98, VOL 1 - GLOBAL EDUCATION ON THE NET, 1998, : 4 - 4
  • [45] The Past, Present and Future of Learning Analytics
    Cardoso, Elsa
    COMPANION PROCEEDINGS OF THE WORLD WIDE WEB CONFERENCE 2018 (WWW 2018), 2018, : 1021 - 1021
  • [46] Past, present and future - Learning the lessons
    Murray, C
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 49 (595): : 42 - 43
  • [47] Present and future of hydrology
    Xiao-fang RUI
    Ning-ning LIU
    Qiao-ling LI
    Xiao LIANG
    WaterScienceandEngineering, 2013, 6 (03) : 241 - 249
  • [48] Present and future of hydrology
    Rui, Xiao-Fang
    Liu, Ning-Ning
    Li, Qiao-Ling
    Liang, Xiao
    WATER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2013, 6 (03) : 241 - 249
  • [49] Neural machine translation: past, present, and future
    Mohamed, Shereen A.
    Elsayed, Ashraf A.
    Hassan, Y. F.
    Abdou, Mohamed A.
    NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2021, 33 (23): : 15919 - 15931
  • [50] Machine perfusion of the liver: past, present and future
    Monbaliu, Diethard
    Brassil, John
    CURRENT OPINION IN ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 15 (02) : 160 - 166