A social network group decision making framework with opinion dynamics considering opinion reliability

被引:3
|
作者
Wang, Han [1 ]
Ju, Yanbing [1 ]
Herrera-Viedma, Enrique [2 ]
Dong, Peiwu [1 ]
Liang, Yingying [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Granada, Andalusian Res Inst Data Sci & Computat Intellige, Dept Comp Sci & AI, Granada 18071, Spain
关键词
Opinion reliability; Group decision making; Opinion dynamics; Social trust network; TRUST PROPAGATION; CONSENSUS MODEL; FEEDBACK MECHANISM; SELF-CONFIDENCE; INFORMATION; CONFLICT;
D O I
10.1016/j.cie.2023.109523
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Opinion dynamics play an important role in the consensus reaching process (CRP) when tackling social network group decision making (SNGDM) problems. Opinion reliability can be regarded as an important characteristic of expert to indicate the reliability of experts' opinions in social trust network. However, it has rarely been considered into the opinion evolution process in SNGDM. To explore the impact of opinion reliability on group consensus reaching, a SNGDM framework with opinion dynamics considering opinion reliability is proposed in this paper. Firstly, opinion reliability of experts in social trust network is defined, and the comprehensive trust degree based on the social network structure and individual characteristic is proposed. Secondly, trust propagation and aggregation mechanisms are designed to obtain the social trust matrix. Thirdly, considering opinion similarity and opinion reliability, social network evolution rules and opinion evolution rules based on the extended Hegselmann-Krause (HK) model are presented. Finally, the proposal is applied to two numerical experiments about supplier performance evaluation and Zachary's karate club, and the simulation and comparison analyses are provided to demonstrate the convergence and illustrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed model.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Heterogeneous Opinion Dynamics Considering Consensus Evolution in Social Network Group Decision-Making
    Wu, Tong
    GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2024, 33 (01) : 159 - 194
  • [2] Heterogeneous Opinion Dynamics Considering Consensus Evolution in Social Network Group Decision-Making
    Tong Wu
    Group Decision and Negotiation, 2024, 33 : 159 - 194
  • [3] An adaptive group decision making framework: Individual and local world opinion based opinion dynamics
    Dong, Qingxing
    Sheng, Qi
    Martinez, Luis
    Zhang, Zhen
    INFORMATION FUSION, 2022, 78 : 218 - 231
  • [4] Opinion dynamics based on group decision making
    Yang Lei
    Tian Xiaodan
    2010 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-BUSINESS AND INFORMATION SYSTEM SECURITY (EBISS 2010), 2010, : 680 - 683
  • [5] Multi-attribute group decision-making considering opinion dynamics
    Li, Yupeng
    Liu, Meng
    Cao, Jin
    Wang, Xiaolin
    Zhang, Na
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2021, 184
  • [6] Multi-attribute group decision-making considering opinion dynamics
    Li, Yupeng
    Liu, Meng
    Cao, Jin
    Wang, Xiaolin
    Zhang, Na
    Expert Systems with Applications, 2021, 184
  • [7] Multi-attribute group decision making with opinion dynamics based on social trust network
    Li, Yanhong
    Kou, Gang
    Li, Guangxu
    Wang, Haomin
    INFORMATION FUSION, 2021, 75 : 102 - 115
  • [8] Opinion convergence and management: Opinion dynamics in interactive group decision-making
    Xu, Yuan
    Liu, Shifeng
    Cheng, T. C. E.
    Feng, Xue
    Wang, Jun
    Shang, Xiaopu
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2025, 323 (03) : 938 - 951
  • [9] Social network group decision-making model considering interactions between trust relationships and opinion evolution
    Ma, Jin
    Wu, Tong
    KYBERNETES, 2024,
  • [10] A review on trust propagation and opinion dynamics in social networks and group decision making frameworks
    Urena, Raquel
    Kou, Gang
    Dong, Yucheng
    Chiclana, Francisco
    Herrera-Viedma, Enrique
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2019, 478 : 461 - 475