Environmental Credit Constraints and the Enterprise Choice of Environmental Protection Behavior

被引:2
|
作者
Yan, Chunrong [1 ]
Xiang, Xintian [1 ]
Li, Liping [2 ]
Li, Guoxiang [3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Polytech Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Shanghai 201209, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Shuren Univ, Sch Econ & Social Welf, Hangzhou 310015, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Normal Univ, Sch Business, Nanjing 210046, Peoples R China
关键词
environmental credit; R&D investment; environmental protection; INFORMATION DISCLOSURE; GREEN INNOVATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.3390/su152416638
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Choosing appropriate environmental protection strategies is important in improving enterprises' economic and environmental performance. Based on the data of A-share listed enterprises from 2009 to 2019 in China, this paper uses the difference-in-differences model to identify the effects of environmental credit constraints on the enterprise choice of environmental protection behavior. We find that environmental credit constraints motivate some enterprises to choose active environmental behavior due to the incentive effect of environmental credit constraints on R&D investments. However, some enterprises may adopt evasive strategies because environmental credit constraints increase production costs and debt. State-owned enterprises prefer active environmental protection strategies to address environmental credit constraints, while private enterprises mainly adopt evasive strategies. Environmental credit constraints make high-interest and high-profitability enterprises choose active environmental strategies. Environmental credit constraints generated by enterprises' evasive environmental behavior increase the probability of litigation and arbitration cases, and environmental credit system construction in the short term may exacerbate unemployment, which the government needs to pay attention to when developing and implementing a blacklist system for environmental fraud. Although there are limitations in this paper in terms of research objectives and samples, the results are important for improving the environmental management system and the operating performance of enterprises.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Theoretical Analysis of Environmental Regulation and Enterprise Behavior
    Lei Pang
    Chen Xiaolei
    2020 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF GREEN BUILDINGS AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 531
  • [22] Cooperatives, Green Behavior, and Environmental Protection
    Alavosius, Mark P.
    Newsome, William D.
    REVISTA LATINOAMERICANA DE PSICOLOGIA, 2012, 44 (01): : 77 - 85
  • [23] ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (ESG), FINANCING CONSTRAINTS, AND ENTERPRISE VALUE
    Du, Yunchao
    Zhang, Jindan
    Deng, Haoying
    TRANSFORMATIONS IN BUSINESS & ECONOMICS, 2023, 22 (3A): : 1039 - 1059
  • [24] Environmental protection tax and trade credit: Evidence from China
    Lu, Xueyao
    Cheng, Lin
    Niu, Yuhao
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCE, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [25] Environmental Protection and Environmental Rights Protection
    CHANG JIAN
    HumanRights, 2013, 12 (03) : 19 - 29
  • [26] Are high efficiency and environmental protection compatible? The impact of China's environmental policies on enterprise productivity
    Wang, Yuan
    Liang, Yanxi
    Wang, Yu
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
  • [27] Environmental credit constraints and pollution reduction: Evidence from China's blacklisting system for environmental fraud
    Di, Danyang
    Li, Guoxiang
    Shen, Zhiyang
    Song, Malin
    Vardanyan, Michael
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2023, 210
  • [28] BIOMECHANICS OF LEAPING - BEHAVIOR UNDER ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS
    HYDE, ML
    AMERICAN ZOOLOGIST, 1979, 19 (03): : 909 - 909
  • [29] Business environment optimization effects on enterprise environmental protection investment
    Guo, Xiaofang
    Chen, Sicen
    Liu, Chenlan
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2025, 71
  • [30] Analysis of Influence of Debt Financing Constraints on Enterprise Investment Behavior Choice
    Tan Heng
    CALL OF PAPER PROCEEDINGS OF 2008 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2008, : 54 - 58