Prostate Imaging for Local Recurrence Reporting and Data System using Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Proposal

被引:0
|
作者
Scialpi, Michele [1 ]
Martorana, Eugenio [2 ]
Trippa, Fabio [3 ]
Di Marzo, Alessandro [3 ]
Scalera, Giovanni Battista [4 ]
Aisa, Maria Cristina [5 ]
D'Andrea, Alfredo [6 ]
Mancioli, Francesco Maria [7 ]
Nicola, Refky [8 ]
Scialpi, Pietro [9 ]
Di Blasi, Aldo [10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Perugia, Santa Maria Misericordia Hosp, Div Diagnost Imaging, Dept Med & Surg, Perugia, Italy
[2] Nuovo Osped Civile Sassuolo, Div Urol, Modena, Italy
[3] Osped Santa Maria, Radiat Oncol Ctr, Terni, Italy
[4] Perugia Hosp Author, Div Radiol, Perugia, Italy
[5] Univ Perugia, Santa Maria Misericordia Hosp, Div Obstetr & Gynaecol, Dept Med & Surg, Perugia, Italy
[6] Osped Caserta, Div Radiol, Caserta, Italy
[7] Osped Santa Maria, Div Radiol, Terni, Italy
[8] SUNY Upstate Med Univ, SUNY Upstate Med, Dept Radiol, Syracuse, NY USA
[9] Portogruaro Hosp, Div Urol, Venice, Italy
[10] Tivoli Hosp, Div Radiol, Tivoli, Italy
关键词
Prostate cancer (PCa); prostate cancer local recurrence (PCLR); radiation therapy (RT); radical prostatectomy (RP); magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Recurrence Reporting (PI-RRADS); EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIOTHERAPY; INCREMENTAL VALUE; CANCER; MRI; THERAPY; 3T; LOCALIZATION; MANAGEMENT; BIOPSY; COIL;
D O I
10.5152/tud.2023.22228
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
We investigated a novel dedicated Prostate Imaging for Local Recurrence Reporting and Data System (PI-RRADS) in biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radiotherapy (RT) and radical prostatectomy (RP) evaluating biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) exams, at 3T MRI of 55 patients. Associating bpMRI and BCR data, we calculated bpMRI diagnostic accuracy. Four probability categories, from 1 (very low) to 4 (very high), were distinguished. In 20 patients with radiotherapy, 25% and 75% of lesions were reported as PI-RRADS 3, and 4, respectively. In 35 patients with radical prostatectomy, 7.7% of lesions were included in PI-RRADS 1-2, whereas 40.4% and 51.9% in PI-RRADS 3 and 4 categories, respectively. Excellent agreement and significant correlation between bpMRI and BCR were found. BpMRI showed sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, false-positive value, false-negative value, and total diagnostic accuracy of 96.15%, 86.7%, 97.4 %, 81.25%, 13.3%, 3.8% and 94.6%, respectively. PI-RRADS based on bpMRI allows the detection and localization of local recurrence in BCR after RT and RP contributing in clinical management and treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 240
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Interobserver Agreement of Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2018
    Abdel Razek, Ahmed Abdel Khalek
    El-Serougy, Lamiaa Galal
    Saleh, Gehad Ahmad
    Abd el-wahab, Rihame
    Shabana, Walaa
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2020, 44 (01) : 118 - 123
  • [42] Reply to "Standardizing Biparametric MRI to Simplify and Improve Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, Version 2, in Prostate Cancer Management"
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Oto, Aytekin
    Turkbey, Baris
    Westphalen, Antonio C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2016, 207 (04) : W76 - W76
  • [43] Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2
    Turkbey, Baris
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Haider, Masoom A.
    Padhani, Anwar R.
    Villeirs, Geert
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    Tempany, Clare M.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Cornud, Francois
    Margolis, Daniel J.
    Thoeny, Harriet C.
    Verma, Sadhna
    Barentsz, Jelle
    Weinreb, Jeffrey C.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 76 (03) : 340 - 351
  • [44] Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) scoring in a transperineal prostate biopsy setting
    Grey, Alistair D. R.
    Chana, Manik S.
    Popert, Rick
    Wolfe, Konrad
    Liyanage, Sidath H.
    Acher, Peter L.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 115 (05) : 728 - 735
  • [45] Prediction of Prostate Cancer Recurrence Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Molecular Profiles
    Shukla-Dave, Amita
    Hricalk, Hedvig
    Ishil, Nicole
    Moskowitz, Chaya S.
    Drobnjak, Marija
    Reuter, Victor E.
    Zakian, Kristen L.
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Cordon-Cardo, Carlos
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2009, 15 (11) : 3842 - 3849
  • [46] Online Interactive Case-Based Instruction in Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Interpretation Using Prostate Imaging and Reporting Data System Version 2: Effect for Novice Readers
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Begovic, Jovan
    Pires, Antonio
    Won, Eugene
    Taneja, Samir S.
    Babb, James S.
    CURRENT PROBLEMS IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY, 2019, 48 (02) : 132 - 141
  • [47] Biparametric Versus Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer: A Choice or a Fine Balance?
    Dias, Adriano B.
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Renard-Penna, Raphaele
    Giganti, Francesco
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2025, 87 (02) : 251 - 252
  • [48] Evaluation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Patients with Prostate-specific Antigen <20 ng/ml
    Wang, Xuan
    Wang, Jian-Ye
    Li, Chun-Mei
    Zhang, Ya-Qun
    Wang, Jian-Long
    Wan, Ben
    Zhang, Wei
    Chen, Min
    Li, Sa-Ying
    Wan, Gang
    Liu, Ming
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 129 (12) : 1432 - 1438
  • [49] Prostate Cancer Local Staging with Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Lin, Yue
    Johnson, Latrice A.
    Fennessy, Fiona M.
    Turkbey, Baris
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 62 (01) : 93 - 108
  • [50] Biparametric Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version2 and International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Predict Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy
    Takeuchi, Nobuyoshi
    Sakamoto, Shinichi
    Nishiyama, Akira
    Horikoshi, Takuro
    Yamada, Yasutaka
    Iizuka, Junpei
    Maimaiti, Maihulan
    Imamura, Yusuke
    Kawamura, Koji
    Imamoto, Takashi
    Komiya, Akira
    Ikehara, Yuzuru
    Akakura, Koichiro
    Ichikawa, Tomohiko
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2018, 16 (04) : E817 - E829