Anterior to Psoas Fusion versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Fusion with Cortical Bone Trajectory Fixation for Single-Level Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease

被引:0
|
作者
Lin, Jui-Feng [1 ,2 ]
Tsai, Cheng-Chia [1 ,3 ]
Huang, Yu-Chuen [4 ,5 ]
Yang, Chih-Chuan [1 ,6 ]
Chen, Yu-Jen [2 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] MacKay Mem Hosp, Dept Surg, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Natl Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ, Inst Tradit Med, Sch Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] MacKay Med Coll, Dept Med, New Taipei, Taiwan
[4] China Med Univ Hosp, Dept Med Res, Taichung, Taiwan
[5] China Med Univ, Coll Chinese Med, Sch Chinese Med, Taichung, Taiwan
[6] MacKay Jr Coll Med Nursing & Management, Taipei, Taiwan
[7] MacKay Mem Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, New Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
anterior to psoas; MI-TLIF; CBT; interbody fusion; LATERAL INTERBODY FUSION; DECOMPRESSION; COMPLICATIONS; POSTERIOR; OUTCOMES; SPINE;
D O I
10.6890/IJGE.202304_17(2).0010
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between an anterior to psoas (ATP) ap-proach combined with cortical bone trajectory (CBT) fixation (ATP group) and minimally invasive trans-foraminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) combined with CBT fixation (MI-TLIF group) for treating patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease and instability. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent interbody fusion and internal fixa-tion between May 1, 2019, and September 30, 2020, using the ATP or MI-TLIF approach to treat degen-erative lumbar disc disease and instability. The visual analog scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) results, blood loss, operation time, complications, and bony fusion were analyzed and compared to understand clinical outcomes. Clinical and radiologic follow-up for all patients was at least 12 months. Results: The ATP approach combined with CBT fixation resulted in less blood loss, earlier reduced VAS scores, better ODI scores, but longer operation time. At 12 months, the fusion rates in the ATP and MI-TLIF groups were 90% (18/20) and 72% (13/18), respectively. Conclusion: Our results show that the ATP approach combined with CBT fixation had the advantage of less blood loss, earlier recovery in VAS scores, and better ODI than in MI-TLIF. Indirect and direct de-compression could be successfully integrated by the ATP approach combined with CBT fixation and laminectomy.Copyright (c) 2023, Taiwan Society of Geriatric Emergency & Critical Care Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 134
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Isthmic Versus Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
    Massel, Dustin H.
    Mayo, Benjamin C.
    Shifflett, Grant D.
    Bohl, Daniel D.
    Louie, Philip K.
    Basques, Bryce A.
    Long, William W.
    Modi, Krishna D.
    Hijji, Fady Y.
    Narain, Ankur S.
    Singh, Kern
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 14 (02): : 115 - 124
  • [32] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (mini-TLIF) in the surgical treatment of degenerative disc disease
    Cusnir, I.
    Bodiu, A.
    Plesca, S.
    Sangheli, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2015, 22 : 795 - 795
  • [33] Cochrane in CORR A® : Arthroplasty Versus Fusion in Single-level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease
    Evaniew, Nathan
    Madden, Kim
    Bhandari, Mohit
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 472 (03) : 802 - 808
  • [34] Obesity and Clinical, Radiographic, and Surgical Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Single-Level Transforaminal versus Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Eghrari, Nafis B.
    Lee, Jonathan J.
    Giraldo, Juan P.
    Choy, Winward
    Williams, Gabriella P.
    O'Neill, Luke K.
    Zhou, James J.
    Farber, S. Harrison
    Abbatematteo, Joseph M.
    Saribekyan, Hovhannes M.
    Turner, Jay D.
    Snyder, Laura A.
    Tumialan, Luis M.
    Uribe, Juan S.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2025, 195
  • [35] Arthroplasty Versus Fusion in Single-Level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease A Cochrane Review
    Boselie, Toon F. M.
    Willems, Paul C.
    van Mameren, Henk
    de Bie, Rob A.
    Benzel, Edward C.
    van Santbrink, Henk
    SPINE, 2013, 38 (17) : E1096 - E1107
  • [36] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Diseases
    Fan Shunwu
    Zhao Xing
    Zhao Fengdong
    Fang Xiangqian
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (17) : 1615 - 1620
  • [37] Comparison of Outcomes of Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy With Fusion and Single-Level Artificial Cervical Disc Replacement for Single-Level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease
    Pandey, Praveen Kumar
    Pawar, Inder
    Gupta, Jyoti
    Verma, Raaghav Rai
    SPINE, 2017, 42 (01) : E41 - E49
  • [38] Risk Factors for Medical and Surgical Complications After Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Narain, Ankur S.
    Parrish, James M.
    Jenkins, Nathaniel W.
    Haws, Brittany E.
    Khechen, Benjamin
    Yom, Kelly H.
    Kudaravalli, Krishna T.
    Guntin, Jordan A.
    Singh, Kern
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2020, 14 (02): : 125 - 132
  • [39] Unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-segment lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis
    He, Yanxing
    Cheng, Qianyue
    She, Jiang
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [40] Clinical Outcomes of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Three-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Fan, Guoxin
    Wu, Xinbo
    Yu, Shunzhi
    Sun, Qi
    Guan, Xiaofei
    Zhang, Hailong
    Gu, Xin
    He, Shisheng
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 2016