The comparative effectiveness of fingolimod, natalizumab, and ocrelizumab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

被引:5
|
作者
Boz, Cavit [1 ]
Ozakbas, Serkan [2 ]
Terzi, Murat [3 ]
Karabudak, Rana [4 ]
Sevim, Serhan [5 ]
Turkoglu, Recai [6 ]
Soysal, Aysun [7 ]
Balci, Belgin Petek [8 ]
Efendi, Husnu [9 ]
Turan, Omer Faruk [10 ]
Yuceyar, Nur [11 ]
Yetkin, Mehmet Fatih [12 ]
Karahan, Serap Zengin [1 ]
Demirkiran, Meltem [13 ]
Guler, Sibel [14 ]
Agan, Kadriye [15 ]
Kiylioglu, Nefati [16 ]
Baba, Cavid [2 ]
Tuncer, Asli [4 ]
Koseoglu, Mesrure [7 ]
机构
[1] Karadeniz Tech Univ, Dept Neurol, Med Fac, TR-61080 Trabzon, Turkiye
[2] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Dept Neurol, Izmir, Turkiye
[3] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Dept Neurol, Samsun, Turkiye
[4] Hacettepe Univ, Dept Neurol, Ankara, Turkiye
[5] Mersin Univ, Dept Neurol, Mersin, Turkiye
[6] Haydarpasa Numune Training & Res Hosp, Istanbul, Turkiye
[7] Bakirkoy Educ & Res Hosp Psychiat & Neurol Dis, Istanbul, Turkiye
[8] Haseki Educ & Res Ctr, Dept Neurol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[9] Kocaeli Univ, Dept Neurol, Izmit, Turkiye
[10] Uludag Univ, Dept Neurol, Bursa, Turkiye
[11] Ege Univ, Dept Neurol, Izmir, Turkiye
[12] Erciyes Univ, Dept Neurol, Kayseri, Turkiye
[13] Cukurova Univ, Dept Neurol, Adana, Turkiye
[14] Trakya Univ, Dept Neurol, Edirne, Turkiye
[15] Marmara Univ, Dept Neurol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[16] Aydin Adnan Menderes Univ, Dept Neurol, Aydin, Turkiye
关键词
Multiple sclerosis; Comparative effectiveness; Fingolimod; Natalizumab; Ocrelizumab; High-efficacy treatment; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; DISEASE-ACTIVITY; ORAL FINGOLIMOD; INTERFERON; RITUXIMAB;
D O I
10.1007/s10072-023-06608-z
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundFingolimod, natalizumab, and ocrelizumab are commonly used in the second-line treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). However, these have only been compared in observational studies, not in controlled trials, with limited and inconclusive results being reported. A comparison of their effect on relapse and disability in a real-world setting is therefore needed.ObjectivesThe objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of fingolimod, natalizumab, and ocrelizumab in reducing disease activity in RRMS.MethodsThis multicenter, retrospective observational study was carried out with prospectively collected data from 16 centers. All consecutive RRMS patients treated with fingolimod, natalizumab, and ocrelizumab were included. Data for relapses, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores, and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were collected. Patients were matched using propensity scores. Annualized relapse rates (ARR), time to first relapse, and disability accumulation were compared.ResultsPropensity score matching retained 736 patients in the fingolimod versus 370 in the natalizumab groups, 762 in the fingolimod versus 434 in the ocrelizumab groups, and 310 in the natalizumab versus 310 in the ocrelizumab groups for final analyses. Mean ARR decreased markedly from baseline after treatment in all three treatment groups. Mean on-treatment ARR was lower in natalizumab-treated patients (0.09, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.07-0.12) than in those treated with fingolimod (0.17, 0.15-0.19, p<0.001), ocrelizumab (0.08, 0.06-0.11), and fingolimod (0.14, 0.12-0.16, p=0.001). No significant difference was observed in mean on-treatment ARR between patients treated with natalizumab (0.08, 0.06-0.11) and ocrelizumab (0.09, 0.07-0.12, p=0.54). Compared to fingolimod, the natalizumab and ocrelizumab groups exhibited a higher percentage of relapse-free patients and a lower percentage of MRI-active patients at year 1. No significance differences in disability accumulation were determined between the therapies.ConclusionNatalizumab and ocrelizumab exhibited similar effects on relapse control, and both were associated with better relapse control than fingolimod. The effects of the three therapies on disability outcomes were similar.
引用
收藏
页码:2121 / 2129
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative analysis of natalizumab versus fingolimod as second-line treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
    Lorscheider, Johannes
    Benkert, Pascal
    Lienert, Carmen
    Hanni, Peter
    Derfuss, Tobias
    Kuhle, Jens
    Kappos, Ludwig
    Yaldizli, Ozgur
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2018, 24 (06) : 777 - 785
  • [22] Oral fingolimod for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
    Doggrell, Sheila A.
    EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2010, 11 (10) : 1777 - 1781
  • [23] Natalizumab in spinal relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
    Zecca, C.
    Kamm, C.
    Riccitelli, G. C.
    Heldner, M.
    Caporro, M.
    Gobbi, C.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2014, 261 : S303 - S303
  • [24] Natalizumab in spinal relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
    Zecca, C.
    Kamm, C.
    Riccitelli, G. C.
    Heldner, M.
    Caporro, M.
    Gobbi, C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2014, 21 : 457 - 457
  • [25] Cost effectiveness of glatiramer acetate and natalizumab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
    Stephanie R. Earnshaw
    Jonathan Graham
    MerriKay Oleen-Burkey
    Jane Castelli-Haley
    Kenneth Johnson
    Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2009, 7 (2) : 91 - 108
  • [26] ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF NATALIZUMAB VERSUS FINGOLIMOD FOR THE TREATMENT OF RELAPSING-REMITTING MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS IN SWEDEN
    Alexopoulos, S. T.
    Deniz, B.
    Walker, A. R.
    Arnold, R.
    Bates, D.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (04) : A145 - A145
  • [27] Cost Effectiveness of Glatiramer Acetate and Natalizumab in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
    Earnshaw, Stephanie
    Graham, Jonathan
    Oleen-Burkey, MerriKay
    Castelli-Haley, Jane
    Johnson, Kenneth
    APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY, 2009, 7 (02) : 91 - 108
  • [28] Efficacy of natalizumab and fingolimod in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in real world clinical practice
    Totaro, R.
    Costantino, G.
    Bellantonio, P.
    Danni, M.
    Di Carmine, C.
    Fantozzi, R.
    Cerqua, R.
    Fuiani, A.
    Mundi, C.
    Ruggieri, S.
    Marini, C.
    Provinciali, L.
    Carolei, A.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2015, 21 : 267 - 267
  • [29] Comparative analysis of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
    Lorscheider, Johannes
    Benkert, Pascal
    Lienert, Carmen
    Haenni, Peter
    Derfuss, Tobias
    Kuhle, Jens
    Kappos, Ludwig
    Yaldizli, Oezguer
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2021, 268 (03) : 941 - 949
  • [30] Comparative analysis of fingolimod versus teriflunomide in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
    Boz, Cavit
    Terzi, Murat
    Ozer, Bilge
    Turkoglu, Recai
    Karabudak, Rana
    Efendi, Husnu
    Soysal, Aysun
    Sevim, Serhan
    Altintas, Ayse
    Kurne, Asli
    Akcali, Aylin
    Akman, Gulsen
    Yuceyar, Nur
    Balci, Belgin Petek
    Ekmekci, Ozgul
    Karahan, Serap Zengin
    Demirkiran, Meltem
    Altunrende, Burcu
    Turan, Omer Faruk
    GozubatikCelik, Gokcen
    Kale, Nilufer
    Koseoglu, Mesrure
    Ozakbas, Serkan
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS, 2019, 36