Comparison of the accuracy between conventional and various digital implant impressions for an implant-supported mandibular complete arch-fixed prosthesis: An in vitro study

被引:10
|
作者
Kosago, Pitchaporn [1 ]
Ungurawasaporn, Chatcharwin [1 ]
Kukiattrakoon, Boonlert [1 ]
机构
[1] Prince Songkla Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Conservat Dent, Hat Yai, Thailand
关键词
accuracy; digital impression; intraoral scanners; stereophotogrammetry; INTRAORAL SCANNERS; 3-DIMENSIONAL ACCURACY; MISFIT;
D O I
10.1111/jopr.13604
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose This in vitro study compared the accuracy between conventional and different intraoral scanner impression methods and stereophotogrammetry term of 3D deviation for a complete mandibular edentulous arch with 5 placed implants. Materials and methods An edentulous mandibular model was prepared with three straight and two 17 degrees angled screw-retained abutments screwed on implants. Different impression techniques were compared: one conventional impression, CO (open-tray splint impression coping, Polyether), three groups of intraoral scanners, TS (Trios 4), IT (iTero Element 2), and PS (Primescan), and one stereophotogrammetry, PIC (Precise Implants Capture). An extraoral scanner (E4 scanner) was used to digitize the reference model as a control group. Scan body positions were compared with 3D deviation by using a 3D analysis software program (Geomagic ControlX 2020.1.1) with the best-fit alignment technique. The accuracy of the scan bodies' position of each impression technique between each group area was analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Scheffe's comparison test for trueness and precision. (alpha = 0.05). Results Statistical 3D deviations of the whole scan body were found among the CO, TS, PS, IT, and PIC groups for both trueness (p < 0.05) and precision (p < 0.05). PIC showed the least 3D deviation of trueness (48.74 +/- 1.80 mu m) and precision (5.46 +/- 1.10 mu m), followed by TS, PS, IT, and CO. CO had the highest 3D deviation of trueness (141 +/- 5.58 mu m) and precision (40.4 +/- 1.3.39 mu m), which was significantly different from PIC, TS, and PS. Conclusions For completed-arch digital implant impressions, stereophotogrammetry has shown better accuracy than other digital and conventional impression techniques, especially in terms of precision. The highest 3D deviation was found in the conventional splint open-tray impression technique.
引用
收藏
页码:616 / 624
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A digital technique for fabricating an interim implant-supported fixed prosthesis immediately after implant placement in patients with complete edentulism
    Oh, Ji-Hyeon
    An, Xueyin
    Jeong, Seung-Mi
    Choi, Byung-Ho
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2019, 121 (01): : 26 - 31
  • [32] An interim solution for a fractured complete-arch fixed implant-supported prosthesis using an Essix retainer
    Thomas, Tyler J.
    Bidra, Avinash S.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2016, 116 (05): : 824 - 825
  • [33] Retentiveness of Various Luting Agents Used With Implant-Supported Prosthesis: An In Vitro Study
    Garg, Pooja
    Pujari, Malesh
    Prithviraj, D. R.
    Khare, Sumit
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2014, 40 (06) : 649 - 654
  • [34] Assessment of the efficacy of posterior extra-short implant support for an interforaminal implant-supported fixed full-arch mandibular prosthesis
    Tukel, H. Can
    Kucukkurt, S.
    JOURNAL OF OSSEOINTEGRATION, 2020, 12 (02) : 181 - 188
  • [35] The cumulative effect of error in the digital workflow for complete-arch implant-supported frameworks: An in vitro study
    Pan, Yu
    Tsoi, James Kit Hon
    Lam, Walter Y. H.
    Zhao, Ke
    Pow, Edmond H. N.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2022, 33 (09) : 886 - 899
  • [36] An alternative digital workflow for fabricating a mandibular implant-supported complete fixed dental prosthesis with limited restorative space: A clinical report
    Belur, Druthil
    Nagy, William W.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2018, 120 (01): : 1 - 4
  • [37] MANDIBULAR IMPLANT-SUPPORTED FIXED DENTAL PROSTHESIS WITH A MODIFIED DESIGN: A CLINICAL REPORT
    Tourah, Anita
    Moshaverinia, Alireza
    Chee, Winston W.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2014, 111 (02): : 91 - 95
  • [38] Digital process for an implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis: A clinical report
    Brandt, Jan
    Lauer, Hans-Christoph
    Peter, Thorsten
    Brandt, Silvia
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2015, 114 (04): : 469 - 473
  • [39] In vitro mechanical analysis of complete-arch mandibular implant-supported fixed prostheses abutment screws after cyclic loading
    Sananez, Andreina
    Lefebvre, Carol
    Looney, Stephen
    Baker, Philip
    Mettenburg, Don
    Rueggeberg, Frederick A.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2015, 113 (05): : 432 - 439
  • [40] Survival of 2039 complete arch fixed implant-supported zirconia prostheses: A retrospective study
    Bidra, Avinash S.
    Tischler, Michael
    Patch, Claudia
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2018, 119 (02): : 220 - 224