Cross-Sectional Survey of Horse Owners to Assess Their Knowledge and Use of Biosecurity Practices for Equine Infectious Diseases in the United States

被引:1
|
作者
White, Nathaniel [1 ]
Pelzel-McCluskey, Angela [2 ]
机构
[1] Equine Dis Commun Ctr, 4033 Iron Works Pkwy, Lexington, KY 40511 USA
[2] US Dept Agr Anim, Plant Hlth Inspection Serv, Vet Serv, 2150 Ctr Ave,Bldg B, Ft Collins, CO 80526 USA
来源
ANIMALS | 2023年 / 13卷 / 22期
关键词
biosecurity; horse owner; horse use; infectious disease; disease risk; survey; OUTBREAK;
D O I
10.3390/ani13223550
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Biosecurity practices are essential to protect the United States horse industry from infectious disease outbreaks. Horse owners' level of knowledge and awareness of biosecurity are not known. To inform the industry, the current practices need to be understood to determine the kind of education needed to improve biosecurity on owners' properties or when traveling to horse events. A survey, which consisted of a website-based questionnaire and collection, was distributed to horse owner organizations' email lists. Evaluation of the results included analysis with a cross-tabulation software to identify significant differences in biosecurity practices associated with horse use and location within the United States. Four areas in the United States were identified (Northeast, Midwest, South and West), and horse use was classified as follows: Pleasure/Trail Riding, Lessons/School, Western Show, English Show, Breeding, Farm/Ranch, Retired, Racing and Driving. In total, 2413 responses were received to the 24-question survey. Differences in biosecurity use and understanding were identified across horse use categories and regions of the country, including differences in the availability of biosecurity plans, risk assessment for horse contact and the use of isolation to mitigate infectious disease. Owners are responsible for medical decision making, and veterinarians are the most trusted resource for medical information. Owners indicated that websites are the preferred way to receive educational information about diseases. There are several biosecurity methods that owners can apply to benefit horse health and welfare. These include temperature monitoring, isolation of new horses at facilities, understanding the risks of horse mingling, knowing the entry requirements such as vaccination and health certificates at events, and having a biosecurity plan for facilities and events where horses come into contact.Abstract Horses are transported in the United States more than any other livestock species and co-mingle at various events; therefore, they are considered to be at an increased risk for infectious disease transmission. The fragmented movement of horses combined with numerous sites of co-mingling makes tracing the potential spread of a disease outbreak a necessary part of an infection control plan, both locally and nationally. The cross-movement of personnel with horses and the persistence of endemic diseases make biosecurity implementation an ongoing challenge. Although many of the risks for infection are known, there is limited documentation about the usefulness of prospective control measures. The objective of this survey was to determine horse owners' understanding and knowledge of biosecurity practices for preventing infectious diseases in the United States. Questions covered owner demographic information, including horse use which was divided into 10 categories as follows: Pleasure/Trail Riding, Lessons/School, Western Show, English Show, Breeding, Farm/Ranch, Retired, Racing, Driving and Other. The survey was distributed by sending requests to a list of horse owner organizations, which then sent emails to their members. The email request described the survey and provided a website link to start the survey. A total of 2413 responses were collected. Analysis of the results included cross-tabulation to identify significant differences in biosecurity knowledge and awareness by horse use. Significant differences by horse use were identified for vaccination, biosecurity planning, use of isolation, disease risk, monitoring for diseases, co-mingling of horses, sanitation, medical decision making and health record requirements for horse events. In summary, the results suggest that most owners are not highly concerned about the risk of disease or the use of biosecurity. There are several biosecurity applications and techniques which can be increased and will benefit horse health and welfare. These include reliance on temperature monitoring, isolation of new horses at facilities, risks of horse mingling, entry requirements such as vaccination and health certificates at events, and an emphasis on having biosecurity plans for facilities and events where horses co-mingle. The information from this study will be used to create tools and information that horse owners and veterinarians can use to implement appropriate biosecurity practices for different types of horse uses and events.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Primary care physicians' preparedness to treat opioid use disorder in the United States: A cross-sectional survey
    Foti, Kathryn
    Heyward, James
    Tajanlangit, Matthew
    Meek, Kristin
    Jones, Christopher
    Kolodny, Andrew
    Alexander, G. Caleb
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2021, 30 : 28 - 29
  • [42] Primary care physicians' preparedness to treat opioid use disorder in the United States: A cross-sectional survey
    Foti, Kathryn
    Heyward, James
    Tajanlangit, Matthew
    Meek, Kristin
    Jones, Christopher
    Kolodny, Andrew
    Alexander, G. Caleb
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2021, 225
  • [43] Knowledge and Perceptions of COVID-19 Among the General Public in the United States and the United Kingdom: A Cross-sectional Online Survey
    Geldsetzer, Pascal
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 173 (02) : 157 - U177
  • [44] Assessment of horse owners' ability to recognise equine laminitis: A cross-sectional study of 93 veterinary diagnosed cases in Great Britain
    Pollard, D.
    Wylie, C. E.
    Verheyen, K. L. P.
    Newton, J. R.
    EQUINE VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2017, 49 (06) : 759 - 766
  • [45] Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of mothers on the use of oral rehydration salts in children with diarrhoea: a cross-sectional survey in Malaysia
    Dujaili, Juman Abdulelah
    Blebil, Ali Qais
    Jayasinghe, Dilhara
    Sivanandan, Nathiya
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE AND RESEARCH, 2021, 51 (04) : 321 - 327
  • [46] Antibiotic Use: A Cross-Sectional Survey Assessing the Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices amongst Students of a School of Medicine in Italy
    Scaioli, Giacomo
    Gualano, Maria R.
    Gili, Renata
    Masucci, Simona
    Bert, Fabrizio
    Siliquini, Roberta
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (04):
  • [47] Knowledge of Antimicrobial Resistance among Veterinary Students and Their Personal Antibiotic Use Practices: A National Cross-Sectional Survey
    Odetokun, Ismail A.
    Akpabio, Uduak
    Alhaji, Nma B.
    Biobaku, Khalid T.
    Oloso, Nurudeen O.
    Ghali-Mohammed, Ibraheem
    Biobaku, Asmau J.
    Adetunji, Victoria O.
    Fasina, Folorunso O.
    ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2019, 8 (04):
  • [48] SHANDONG RESIDENTS READINESS FOR SODIUM REDUCTION: A CROSS-SECTIONAL SURVEY TO ASSESS KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDE AND PRACTICES (KAP) RELATED TO SALT AND HEALTH
    Zhang Juan
    Shi Xiaoming
    Ma Jixiang
    Zhang Xiaofei
    Wang Huicheng
    Li Yichong
    Li Yuan
    Liang Xiaofeng
    HEART, 2012, 98 : E133 - E134
  • [49] Neurological Surgery Residency Programs in the United States: A National Cross-Sectional Survey
    Ng, Patrick R.
    Yearley, Alexander G.
    Eatz, Tiffany A.
    Ajmera, Sonia
    West, Timothy
    Razak, Shahaan S.
    Lazaro, Tyler
    Urakov, Timur
    Jones, Pamela S.
    Coumans, Jean-Valery
    Stapleton, Christopher J.
    Shankar, Ganesh
    Chen, H. Isaac
    Komotar, Ricardo J.
    Patel, Akash J.
    Nahed, Brian V.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 94 (03) : 529 - 537
  • [50] Prevalence of Axial Spondylarthritis in the United States: Estimates From a Cross-Sectional Survey
    Reveille, John D.
    Witter, James P.
    Weisman, Michael H.
    ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2012, 64 (06) : 905 - 910