Non-invasive imaging of neural activity with magnetic detection electrical impedance tomography (MDEIT): a modelling study

被引:7
|
作者
Mason, Kai [1 ]
Aristovich, Kirill [1 ]
Holder, David [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Med Phys & Biomed Engn, Gower St, London, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
impedance imaging; tomography; neural imaging; magnetometry; human; non-invasive; NEURONAL DEPOLARIZATION; EVOKED RESPONSES; HUMAN HEAD; EIT; RECONSTRUCTION; BRAIN; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FIELD;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6579/ad0358
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Objectives. (1) Develop a computational pipeline for three-dimensional fast neural magnetic detection electrical impedance tomography (MDEIT), (2) determine whether constant current or constant voltage is preferable for MDEIT, (3) perform reconstructions of simulated neural activity in a human head model with realistic noise and compare MDEIT to EIT and (4) perform a two-dimensional study in a saline tank for MDEIT with optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) and compare reconstruction algorithms. Approach. Forward modelling and image reconstruction were performed with a realistic model of a human head in three dimensions and at three noise levels for four perturbations representing neural activity. Images were compared using the error in the position and size of the reconstructed perturbations. Two-dimensional MDEIT was performed in a saline tank with a resistive perturbation and one OPM. Six reconstruction algorithms were compared using the error in the position and size of the reconstructed perturbations. Main results. A computational pipeline was developed in COMSOL Multiphysics, reducing the Jacobian calculation time from months to days. MDEIT reconstructed images with a lower reconstruction error than EIT with a mean difference of 7.0%, 5.5% and 11% for three noise cases representing current noise, reduced current source noise and reduced current source and magnetometer noise. A rank analysis concluded that the MDEIT Jacobian was less rank-deficient than the EIT Jacobian. Reconstructions of a phantom in a saline tank had a best reconstruction error of 13%, achieved using 0th-order Tikhonov regularisation with simulated noise-based correction. Significance. This study demonstrated that three-dimensional MDEIT for neural imaging is feasible and that MDEIT reconstructed superior images to EIT, which can be explained by the lesser rank deficiency of the MDEIT Jacobian. Reconstructions of a perturbation in a saline tank demonstrated a proof of principle for two-dimensional MDEIT with OPMs and identified the best reconstruction algorithm.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Non-invasive monitoring of central blood pressure by electrical impedance tomography: first experimental evidence
    Sola, Josep
    Adler, Andy
    Santos, Arnoldo
    Tusman, Gerardo
    Suarez Sipmann, Fernando
    Bohm, Stephan H.
    MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2011, 49 (04) : 409 - 415
  • [22] A convolutional neural network algorithm for breast tumor detection with magnetic detection electrical impedance tomography
    Chen, Ruijuan
    Zhao, Songsong
    Wu, Weiwei
    Sun, Zhihui
    Wang, Jinhai
    Wang, Huiquan
    Han, Guang
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 2021, 92 (06):
  • [23] Imaging fast electrical activity in the brain with electrical impedance tomography
    Aristovich, Kirill Y.
    Packham, Brett C.
    Koo, Hwan
    dos Santos, Gustavo Sato
    McEvoy, Andy
    Holder, David S.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2016, 124 : 204 - 213
  • [24] Comparing machine learning algorithms for non-invasive detection and classification of failure in piezoresistive bone cement via electrical impedance tomography
    Keiderling, L.
    Rosendorf, J.
    Owens, C. E.
    Varadarajan, K. M.
    Hart, A. J.
    Schwab, J.
    Tallman, T. N.
    Ghaednia, H.
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 2023, 94 (12):
  • [25] Fast imaging for magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography
    Hamamura, Mark J.
    Muftuler, L. Tugan
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2008, 26 (06) : 739 - 745
  • [26] Coregistration of electrical impedance tomography and magnetic resonance imaging
    Halter, R. J.
    Manwaring, P.
    Hartov, A.
    Paulsen, K. D.
    13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL BIOIMPEDANCE AND THE 8TH CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY 2007, 2007, 17 : 416 - 419
  • [27] Non-invasive coronary artery imaging with electron beam computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging
    de Feyter, PJ
    Nieman, K
    van Ooijen, P
    Oudkerk, M
    HEART, 2000, 84 (04) : 442 - 448
  • [28] System for non-invasive epicardial potential mapping and impedance tomography
    Popescu, S
    Panescu, D
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 19TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOL 19, PTS 1-6: MAGNIFICENT MILESTONES AND EMERGING OPPORTUNITIES IN MEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1997, 19 : 331 - 334
  • [29] Non-Invasive Three Dimensional Cardiac Electrical Imaging: A Clinical Study
    Yu, Long
    Jin, Qi
    Zhou, Zhaoye
    Wu, Liqun
    He, Bin
    CIRCULATION, 2014, 130
  • [30] Non-invasive imaging - Contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging
    Dill, T.
    HEART, 2008, 94 (07) : 943 - 948