A prospective, multicenter head-to-head comparative study in patients with primary high-risk prostate cancer investigating the bone lesion detection of conventional imaging and 18F-PSMA-PET/CT

被引:3
|
作者
Bodar, Y. J. L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Luining, W. I. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Keizer, B. [4 ]
Meijer, D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Schaaf, M. [6 ]
Vellekoop, A. [5 ]
Hendrikse, N. H. [2 ]
Van Moorselaar, R. J. A. [1 ,3 ]
Oprea-Lager, D. E. [2 ]
Vis, A. N. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, VU Univ, Dept Urol, Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, VU Univ, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, Netherlands
[3] Prostate Canc Network, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, Netherlands
[4] Dijklander Hosp, Dept Urol, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, Netherlands
[5] Amstelland Hosp, Dept Urol, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, Netherlands
[6] Bovenij Hosp, Dept Urol, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, Netherlands
关键词
Bone scan; Prostate cancer; PSMA-PET; CT; Staging; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; BIOCHEMICAL FAILURE; RADIATION-THERAPY; PROGRESSION; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.12.006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is an emerging staging tool for patients with primary high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). Patients with primary metastatic disease are staged using PSMA-PET/CT imaging, while previously published randomized clinical trials relied on conventional imaging (i.e., bone scintigraphy (BS) results. The aim of this study was to compare the ability of bone metastatic lesion detection and changes in staging for 18F-PSMA-PET/CT versus BS in high-risk PCa patients. Methods: 79 patients with high-risk PCa were prospectively staged using BS and subsequent 18F-PSMA-PET/CT before initial therapy. Patients who presented with a BS showing no metastases represented Group 1, and patients with a BS showing low-volume disease accord-ing to the CHAARTED criteria (<4 bone metastases, no metastases outside vertebral column or pelvis and no visceral metastases) repre-sented Group 2. Metastatic risk group according to CHAARTED and treatment strategies based on both imaging modalities were assessed. Results: A change of CHAARTED risk group was observed in 9/70 (12.8%) of patients in Group 1. In Group 2, a change of risk group was found in 66.7% of patients, due to either upstaging (4/9 patients (44.4%)) and downstaging (2/9 patients (22.2%)). Treatment changes due to use of a different imaging modality occurred in almost 20% of patients. Conclusion: In patients with negative for cancer results on BS, upstaging on 18F-PSMA-PET/CT occurred only infrequently. Moreover, 18F-PSMA-PET/CT resulted in both upstaging and downstaging in a substantial subset of patients with low-volume metastatic disease on BS. Treatment changes occurred in almost 20% of cases depending on imaging results. (c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
引用
收藏
页码:205.e17 / 205.e24
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Head-to-Head Comparison of [18F]PSMA-1007 and [18F] FDG PET/CT in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Andryszak, N.
    Swiniuch, D.
    Wojcik, E.
    Ramlau, R.
    Ruchala, M.
    Czepczynski, R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2024, 51 : S18 - S19
  • [22] A Prospective Head-to-Head Comparison of 18F-Fluciclovine With 68Ga-PSMA-11 in Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer in PET/CT: A Special Aspect in Imaging Local Recurrence: Reply
    Pernthaler, Birgit
    Kvaternik, Herbert
    Aigner, Reingard M.
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 45 (06) : 498 - +
  • [23] PSMA PET/CT to stage high-risk prostate cancer: is already the time to replace conventional imaging?
    Schiavina, Riccardo
    Bianchi, Lorenzo
    Bunocilla, Eugenio
    MINERVA UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 73 (01): : 135 - 136
  • [24] Head-to-Head Comparison of [18F]PSMA-1007 and [18F]FDG PET/CT in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Andryszak, Natalia
    Swiniuch, Daria
    Wojcik, Elzbieta
    Ramlau, Rodryg
    Ruchala, Marek
    Czepczynski, Rafal
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (03)
  • [25] Ga-68 PSMA-11 VS F-18 PSMA-1007 PET/CT Imaging In Patients With Prostate Cancer: A Head To Head Comparison
    Vangu, M.
    Mbakaza, O.
    Purbhoo, K.
    Momodu, J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2022, 49 (SUPPL 1) : S499 - S499
  • [26] A prospective study on dual time 18 F-FDG-PET/CT in high-risk prostate cancer patients
    Mortensen M.A.
    Vilstrup M.H.
    Poulsen M.H.
    Gerke O.
    Høilund-Carlsen P.F.
    Lund L.
    BMC Research Notes, 11 (1)
  • [27] Head-to-head comparison of 99mTc-PSMA and 99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT in diagnosing prostate cancer bone metastasis: a prospective, comparative imaging trial
    Zhang, Yu
    Lin, Zhiyi
    Li, Tao
    Wei, Yongbao
    Yu, Mingdian
    Ye, Liefu
    Cai, Yuqing
    Yang, Shengping
    Zhang, Yanmin
    Shi, Yuanying
    Chen, Wenxin
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [28] Head-to-head comparison of 99mTc-PSMA and 99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT in diagnosing prostate cancer bone metastasis: a prospective, comparative imaging trial
    Yu Zhang
    Zhiyi Lin
    Tao Li
    Yongbao Wei
    Mingdian Yu
    Liefu Ye
    Yuqing Cai
    Shengping Yang
    Yanmin Zhang
    Yuanying Shi
    Wenxin Chen
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [29] Bone metastases from prostate cancer: Head-to-head comparison of 99mTc-MDP scintigraphy, 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT, and 18F-fluoride PET/CT
    Hoilund-Carlsen, Poul
    Poulsen, Mads
    Petersen, Henrik
    Jakobsen, Jorn
    Gerke, Oke
    Karstoft, Jens
    Walter, Steen
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2012, 53
  • [30] PRIMARY METASTASIS STAGING USING 18F-PSMA-1007 PET-CT IN HIGH-RISK PROSTATE CANCER
    Anttinen, Mikael
    Ettala, Otto
    Malaspina, Simona
    Jambor, Ivan
    Sandell, Minna
    Kajander, Sami
    Rinta-Kiikka, Irina
    Schildt, Jukka
    Saukko, Ekaterina
    Rautio, Pentti
    Timonen, Kirsi L.
    Noponen, Tommi
    Saunavaara, Jani
    Loyttyniemi, Eliisa
    Taimen, Pekka
    Kemppainen, Jukka
    Dean, Peter B.
    Blanco, Roberto Sequeiros
    Aronen, Hannu J.
    Seppanen, Marko
    Bostrom, Peter J.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E952 - E952