Interactivity and materiality matter in creativity: educational robotics for the assessment of divergent thinking

被引:9
|
作者
Leroy, Anais [1 ]
Romero, Margarida [2 ]
Cassone, Laura [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cote Azur, Lab Innovat & Numer Educ LINE, Psychol, Neuropsychol, Nice, France
[2] Univ Cote Azur, Lab Innovat & Numer Educ LINE, Nice, France
[3] Univ Cote Azur, Lab Innovat & Numer Educ LINE, ANR CreaMaker Projet, Nice, France
关键词
Creativity; divergent thinking; educational robotics; fluency; flexibility; originality;
D O I
10.1080/10494820.2021.1875005
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Idea generation in interactive learning environments requires the consideration of the interactivity and materiality aspects of creativity. In educational robotics, idea generation is mediated through a technological object in a process allowing us to observe the three main components of divergent thinking: fluency, flexibility, and originality. Nevertheless, divergent thinking assessment has been mainly evaluated in the last decades through semantic idea generation tasks such the Alternative Uses Test (AUT), asking participants to write different uses for familiar objects. In our study, we aimed to analyze differences in the three divergent thinking components (fluency, flexibility, and originality) through the AUT as a semantic task and through an educational robotic task that engaged the participants in building their ideas interactively. Results show that the creative components are strongly correlated within but not between the two tasks, leading us to consider the differences in the creative processes engaged when generating ideas through building with robotic objects. The role of affordances in idea generation through educational robotics is discussed as an important difference to consider in the evaluation of creativity in interactive learning environments.
引用
收藏
页码:2194 / 2205
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Happy creativity: Listening to happy music facilitates divergent thinking
    Ritter, Simone M.
    Ferguson, Sam
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (09):
  • [42] DIVERGENT THINKING IN CHILDREN - EFFECTS OF CONDITIONS OF TESTING AND QUESTION OF CREATIVITY
    NICHOLLS, JG
    NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES, 1971, 6 (02) : 182 - 183
  • [44] A new method for training creativity: narrative as an alternative to divergent thinking
    Fletcher, Angus
    Benveniste, Mike
    ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 2022, 1512 (01) : 29 - 45
  • [46] Is intelligence necessary and sufficient for creativity? An analysis of convergent and divergent thinking
    Dechaume, Merav
    Mercier, Maxence
    Feybesse, Cyrille
    Lubart, Todd
    Chouvelon, Gaelle
    Kermarrec, Solenn
    Tordjman, Sylvie
    LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2024, 116
  • [47] Design Thinking as an Auxiliary Tool for Educational Robotics Classes
    Tramonti, Michela
    Dochshanov, Alden Meirzhanovich
    Zhumabayeva, Assel Sagnayevna
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (02):
  • [48] Educational Robotics and Tangible Devices for Promoting Computational Thinking
    Funk, Matthias G.
    Cascalho, Jose Manuel
    Santos, Ana Isabel
    Mendes, Armando B.
    FRONTIERS IN ROBOTICS AND AI, 2021, 8
  • [49] Feasibility of online divergent thinking assessment
    Hass, Richard W.
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2015, 46 : 85 - 93
  • [50] STEM co-educational environments combining Educational Robotics and Computational Thinking
    Rincon, Brenda Karollyn Cruz
    Garcia-Holgado, Alicia
    Garcia-Penalvo, Francisco Jose
    CAMPUS VIRTUALES, 2025, 14 (01): : 215 - 241