Pharmacomechanical thrombectomy with Angiojet in acute arterial occlusions: A prospective study among the results and outcomes

被引:1
|
作者
Soares, Rafael de Athayde [1 ,2 ]
Campos, Ana Beatriz Campelo [1 ]
Portela, Matheus Veras Viana [1 ]
Brienze, Carolina Sabadoto [1 ]
Brancher, Giovana Quarentei Barros [1 ]
Sacilotto, Roberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Serv Publ Estadual Sao Paulo, Div Vasc & Endovasc Surg, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Hosp Serv Publ Estadual Sao Paulo, Div Vasc & Endovasc Surg, Ibirapuera 981,Indianopolis, BR-04028000 Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Acute limb ischemia; pharmacomechanical thrombectomy; limb loss; amputations; endovascular surgery; PERCUTANEOUS MECHANICAL THROMBECTOMY; ACUTE LIMB ISCHEMIA; EUROPEAN-SOCIETY; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; RISK;
D O I
10.1177/17085381241237559
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objective:The main objective of this present paper was to evaluate the results and outcomes of patients with acute limb ischemia (ALI) submitted to pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (PMT) endovascular surgery with Angiojet, regarding the number of cycles/pumps. Methods: Prospective, consecutive cohort study of ALI patients submitted to PMT endovascular intervention subdivided into two groups according to the number of cycles in the Angiojet technique: Group 1 higher than 150 cycles/second and Group 2 lesser than 150 cycles/second (cycles/s). Results: Overall, 92 patients with ALI submitted to PMT were evaluated. Two groups of patients were identified: Group 1 higher than 150 cycles/s with 60 patients and Group 2 lesser than 150 cycles/s with 32 patients. The overall mortality rate (OMR) was 15.1% (13 patients) in total cohort within the first 30 days. Group 1 had a higher OMR than Group 2 (16.1% vs 9.3%, p = 0.007). There were 4 cases of hematuria (4.3%), all of them in Group 1. We have performed a Kaplan-Meier regarding limb salvage rates: Group 1 had 85% and Group 2 had 95.7% at 1057 days. P = 0.081. Among the factors evaluated, the following were related to overall mortality rate: PMT with higher >150 cycles/s (HR = 7.17, p = 0.007, CI: 1.38-8.89), COVID-19 infection (HR = 2.75, p = 0.010, CI = 1.73-5.97), and post-operative acute kidney injury (HR = 2.97, p < 0.001, CI = 1.32-8.13). Among the factors evaluated, the following was related to limb loss: post-operative acute kidney injury (HR = 4.41, p = 0.036, CI: 1.771-7.132), probably because patients experiencing limb loss have a higher incidence of acute renal insufficiency due to higher circulating myoglobin higher hemolysis from the increased Angiojet cycles inducing rhabdomyolysis. Conclusion: PMT with Angiojet is a safe and effective therapy in patients with ALI. However, patients receiving greater than 150 cycles/s were noted to have higher rates of acute kidney injury and mortality. This is likely reflective of increased thrombus burden and higher rates of hemolysis. Acute kidney injury, greater than 150 cycles/s, and COVID-19 infection were the variables with the strongest association to perioperative mortality.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 49
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysis and results of pharmacomechanical thrombectomy with AngioJet in acute arterial occlusions: a prospective comparison study among the number of cycles and outcomes
    Soares, Rafael de Athayde
    Campos, Ana B. Campelo
    Portela, Matheus Veras Viana
    Sacilotto, Roberto
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 30 (03): : 69 - 75
  • [2] Comparison of AngioJet Rheolytic Pharmacomechanical Thrombectomy versus AngioJet Rheolytic Thrombectomy in a Porcine Peripheral Arterial Model
    Peter H. Lin
    Firas F. Mussa
    Nasim Hedayati
    Joseph J. Naoum
    Wei Zhou
    Qizhi Yao
    Panagiotis Kougias
    Hosam F. El Sayed
    Changyi Chen
    World Journal of Surgery, 2007, 31 : 715 - 722
  • [3] Comparison of AngioJet rheolytic pharmacomechanical thrombectomy versus AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy in a porcine peripheral arterial model
    Lin, Peter H.
    Mussa, Firas F.
    Hedayati, Nasim
    Naoum, Joseph J.
    Zhou, Wei
    Yao, Qizhi
    Kougias, Panagiotis
    El Sayed, Hosam F.
    Chen, Changyi
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 31 (04) : 715 - 722
  • [4] Risk of Acute Kidney Injury after Percutaneous Pharmacomechanical Thrombectomy Using AngioJet in Venous and Arterial Thrombosis
    Escobar, Guillermo A.
    Burks, Dillon
    Abate, Matthew R.
    Faramawi, Mohammed F.
    Ali, Ahsan T.
    Lyons, Lewis C.
    Moursi, Mohammed M.
    Smeds, Matthew R.
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 42 : 238 - 245
  • [5] Mechanical thromboembolectomy in acute embolic peripheral arterial occlusions with use of the angiojet rapid thrombectomy system
    Mathie, AG
    Bell, SD
    Saibil, EA
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 1999, 10 (05) : 583 - 590
  • [6] Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes between Angiojet Pharmacomechanical Thrombectomy and Hybrid Surgical Thrombectomy for Thrombotic Occlusion of Hemodialysis Access
    Lee, Ho Yeong
    Kim, Cheol Seung
    Han, Kyu Dam
    Kim, Mi Jin
    VASCULAR SPECIALIST INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 36 (04) : 241 - 247
  • [7] Early Outcomes of Pharmacomechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis Patients
    Ezelsoy, Mehmet
    Turunc, Gorkem
    Bayram, Muhammed
    HEART SURGERY FORUM, 2015, 18 (06): : E222 - E225
  • [8] Pharmacomechanical Thrombectomy (PMT) with AngioJet Solent Omni Compared with Catheter Directed Aspiration Thrombectomy (CDAT) for Treatment of Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT)
    Kim, Jang Yong
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 69 (16) : S71 - S71
  • [9] Aspiration thrombectomy in acute and subacute arterial occlusions of the lower extremity
    Canova, CR
    VASA-JOURNAL OF VASCULAR DISEASES, 2004, 33 : 24 - 26
  • [10] Clinical outcomes of AngioJet pharmacomechanical thrombectomy versus catheter-directed thrombolysis for the treatment of filter-related caval thrombosis
    Li, Jin-Yong
    Liu, Jian-Long
    Tian, Xuan
    Jia, Wei
    Jiang, Peng
    Cheng, Zhi-Yuan
    Zhang, Yun-Xin
    Liu, Xiao
    Zhou, Mi
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2023, 11 (03) : 598 - 609