A review of the psychometric properties and implications for the use of the fertility quality of life tool

被引:9
|
作者
Woods, Brittany M. M. [1 ]
Bray, Leigh Ann [2 ]
Campbell, Sukhkamal [3 ]
Holland, Aimee [4 ]
Mrug, Sylvie [5 ]
Ladores, Sigrid [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Nursing, 1720 2nd Ave South, NB482, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Capstone, Coll Nursing, Off 3160,Box 870358, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham Med, Fertil Preservat Serv, 1700 6Th Ave South,Women & Infants Ctr 10390, Birmingham, AL 35233 USA
[4] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Grad Clin Educ, Sch Nursing, 1720 2nd Ave South, NB 406A, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[5] Univ Alabama Birmingham, 1720 2nd Ave South, CH415, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[6] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Nursing, 1720 2nd Ave South, NB422, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
关键词
Infertility; Quality of life; Systematic review; Psychometrics; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; HOSPITAL ANXIETY; INFERTILE WOMEN; PREGNANCY RATES; SOCIAL SUPPORT; STRESS; DEPRESSION; VALIDATION; FERTIQOL; MEN;
D O I
10.1186/s12955-023-02125-x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives To analyze and synthesize the reported psychometric properties of the Fertility Quality of Life (FertiQoL) instrument and describe its implications for use in practice and research in men and women with infertility. Methods A systematic literature search was performed to identify all articles using the FertiQoL tool. PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched from September 2006 through May 2022. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they reported psychometric data on the original FertiQoL tool using a sample population of individuals with infertility. Sample size, country of origin, and psychometric data were documented for each study. Results The initial search revealed 153 articles that had utilized the FertiQoL. Following abstract, title, and fulltext screenings, 53 articles reported psychometric data and met criteria for inclusion. The FertiQoL is a sound measurement with satisfactory reliability and validity. Studies indicated adequate reliability in the overall scale ( alpha = 0.43 - 0.92), as well as the core Emotional, Mind/Body, Social, and Relational scales ( alpha = 0.43 - 0.92) and two optional Tolerability and Environment fertility treatment subscales ( alpha = 0.67 - 0.91). Although the Relational subscale exhibited slightly lower reliability in several studies, the internal consistency for the measurement as a whole was satisfactory. Results also indicate adequate: 1) face and content validity with extensive professional and patient feedback during development; 2) convergent validity with general quality of life, depression, and anxiety measurements; and 3) structural validity using both confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses. Conclusion The FertiQoL tool is the most commonly used instrument to measure the impact of fertility issues on quality of life in men and women with infertility. Understanding the impact of infertility on quality of life provides valuable insight into the areas of infertility-related care that need to be prioritized, such as mental health or relational stressors. While the instrument has been used in different patient populations with infertility and available in multiple translations, it is necessary to understand the updated psychometric properties and the implications for its use. This review shows that the FertiQoL is reliable and valid for cross-cultural use among individuals with various etiologies of infertility.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Which is the best instrument? A psychometric comparison of COMPI fertility problem stress (COMPI-FPSS), fertility problem inventory (FPI), and fertility quality of life tool (FertiQoL)
    Pedro, J.
    Frederiksen, Y.
    Schmidt, L.
    Ingerslev, H. J.
    Zachariae, R.
    Martins, M. V.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 : 360 - 361
  • [22] Measures of quality of life of people with neurogenic overactive bladder: A systematic review of psychometric properties
    Ali, Mohammed Usman
    Fong, Kenneth N. K.
    Kannan, Priya
    Winser, Stanley John
    Bello, Umar Muhammad
    Salihu, Dauda
    Kranz, Georg S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2024, 292 : 40 - 57
  • [23] Psychometrics properties of the Iranian version of fertility quality of life tool: A cross-sectional study
    Hekmatzadeh, Seyedeh-Fatemeh
    Bazarganipour, Fatemeh
    Hosseini, Nazafarin
    Allan, Helen
    Jalali, Somayeh
    Abbasian, Zahra
    Barani, Akram
    Balochi, Fereshteh
    Khademi, Saeideh
    Mahmoudi, Tahereh
    Niknam, Roghayeh
    Khashavi, Zahra
    Taghavi, Seyed Abdolvahab
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE, 2018, 16 (03) : 191 - 198
  • [24] Fertility quality of life tool: update on research and practice considerations
    Koert, Emily
    Takefman, Janet
    Boivin, Jacky
    HUMAN FERTILITY, 2021, 24 (04) : 236 - 248
  • [25] Use of the LIFE-H in stroke rehabilitation: A structured review of its psychometric properties
    Figueiredo, Sabrina
    Korner-Bitensky, Nicol
    Rochette, Annie
    Desrosiers, Johanne
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2010, 32 (09) : 705 - 712
  • [26] Use of the LIFE-H in stroke rehabilitation: a structured review of its psychometric properties
    Figueiredo, Sabrina
    Korner-Bitensky, Nicol
    Rochette, Annie
    Desrosiers, Johanne
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2010, 19 : 119 - 119
  • [27] Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of Quality of Life Index
    Halabi, Jehad O.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2006, 55 (05) : 604 - 610
  • [28] Psychometric properties of the quality of life index: Diabetes version
    Quinn, LT
    Poradzisz, M
    Ferrans, C
    DIABETES, 1999, 48 : A320 - A320
  • [29] Psychometric properties of a Chinese asthma quality of life questionnaire
    Wang, Ningqun
    Huang, Xiaobo
    Chen, Wenqiang
    Zhang, Xiaomei
    Zhang, Yongsheng
    Chen, Yujing
    JOURNAL OF ASTHMA, 2017, 54 (10) : 1073 - 1084
  • [30] Nurses' Quality of Life Scale: Validation and Psychometric Properties
    Sili, Alessandro
    De Maria, Maddalena
    Fiorini, Jacopo
    Zaghini, Francesco
    Barbarnelli, Claudio
    EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2022, 45 (03) : 249 - 259