Comparison of Oncological Outcomes between Transperitoneal and Retroperitoneal Approaches in Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomies for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

被引:0
|
作者
Otoshi, Taiyo [1 ]
Yamasaki, Takeshi [1 ]
Matsue, Taisuke [1 ]
Yukimatsu, Nao [1 ]
Kato, Minoru [1 ]
Machida, Yuichi [1 ]
Iwai, Tomoaki [1 ]
Kuratsukuri, Katsuyuki [1 ]
Uchida, Junji [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Metropolitan Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Urol, 1-4-3 Asahi Machi,Abeno Ku, Osaka 5458585, Japan
来源
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA | 2024年 / 60卷 / 03期
关键词
upper tract urothelial carcinoma; laparoscopic nephroureterectomy; transperitoneal approach; RADICAL NEPHROURETERECTOMY; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.3390/medicina60030421
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives: Our aim was to clarify the oncological outcomes of the two different approaches to laparoscopic nephroureterectomies (LNUs) in Japan, and to examine whether there were any significant differences between the transperitoneal approach and the retroperitoneal approach. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent an LNU for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) from January 2013 to December 2022. We identified 52 patients who underwent a transperitoneal LNU (tLNU) and 93 who underwent a retroperitoneal LNU (rLNU). We adopted age, smoking, and pT-stage matching, and 43 patients were classified in each group. We investigated the time from surgery to recurrence (RFS: recurrence-free survival), the time to death (OS: overall survival), and the time to non-urothelial-tract recurrence-free survival (NUTRFS). A Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the risk factors that influenced recurrence. Results: There were no significant differences in the RFS, OS, and NUTRFS between the two matched groups. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, the pT stage (pT3 >= vs. pT2 <=) had an HR = 2.09 and a p = 0.01, and was an independent prognostic risk factor regarding cancer recurrence. Conclusions: There were no significant differences in the oncological outcomes between the tLNU and rLNU groups. It is suggested that the transperitoneal approach should be selected for LNUs.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of post-operative intravesical recurrence and oncological outcomes after open versus laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma
    Lujia Zou
    Limin Zhang
    Hu Zhang
    Haowen Jiang
    Qiang Ding
    World Journal of Urology, 2014, 32 : 565 - 570
  • [32] Comparison of post-operative intravesical recurrence and oncological outcomes after open versus laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma
    Zou, Lujia
    Zhang, Limin
    Zhang, Hu
    Jiang, Haowen
    Ding, Qiang
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 32 (02) : 565 - 570
  • [33] ROBOTIC RETROPERITONEAL NEPHROURETECTOMY FOR UPPER TRACT UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA
    McDowell, Zachary
    Porter, James
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 206 : E860 - E861
  • [34] Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis
    Radosław Piszczek
    Łukasz Nowak
    Wojciech Krajewski
    Joanna Chorbińska
    Sławomir Poletajew
    Marco Moschini
    Krzysztof Kaliszewski
    Romuald Zdrojowy
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 19
  • [35] Comparing Oncological Outcomes and Surgical Complications of Hand-Assisted, Laparoscopic and Robotic Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
    Li, Ching-Chia
    Chang, Chao-Hsiang
    Huang, Chi-Ping
    Hong, Jian-Hua
    Huang, Chao-Yuan
    Chen, I-Hsuan Alan
    Lin, Jen-Tai
    Lo, Chi-Wen
    Yu, Chih-Chin
    Tseng, Jen-Shu
    Lin, Wun-Rong
    Wu, Wei-Che
    Chung, Shiu-Dong
    Hsueh, Thomas Y.
    Chiu, Allen W.
    Chen, Yung-Tai
    Chen, Shin-Hong
    Jiang, Yuan-Hong
    Tsai, Yao-Chou
    Chiang, Bing-Juin
    Lin, Wei Yu
    Jou, Yeong-Chin
    Wu, Chia-Chang
    Lee, Hsiang-Ying
    Yeh, Hsin-Chih
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [36] Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis
    Piszczek, Radoslaw
    Nowak, Lukasz
    Krajewski, Wojciech
    Chorbinska, Joanna
    Poletajew, Slawomir
    Moschini, Marco
    Kaliszewski, Krzysztof
    Zdrojowy, Romuald
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [37] COMPARISON OF INVASIVENESS BETWEEN TRANSPERITONEAL AND RETROPERITONEAL APPROACHES IN LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHRECTOMY BY MEASURING CIRCULATING CYTOKINES
    Narita, S.
    Kumazawa, T.
    Saito, M.
    Horikawa, Y.
    Tsuchiya, N.
    Habuchi, T.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2009, 23 : A104 - A104
  • [38] ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES AFTER NEPHROURETERECTOMY FOR UPPER URINARY TRACT UROTHELIAL CANCER: LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS HAND-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN APPROACHES
    Kitamura, Hiroshi
    Masumori, Naoya
    Tanaka, Toshiaki
    Fukuta, Fumimasa
    Igarashi, Manabu
    Nishida, Sachiyo
    Inoue, Ryuta
    Takahashi, Satoshi
    Tsukamoto, Taiji
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 : A216 - A216
  • [39] The Prognostic Role of Body Mass Index on Oncological Outcomes of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
    Liu, Kang
    Zhao, Hongda
    Ng, Chi-Fai
    Teoh, Jeremy Yuen-Chun
    Laguna, Pilar
    Gontero, Paolo
    Saltirov, Iliya
    de la Rosette, Jean
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (22)
  • [40] ASSOCIATION OF SOCIOECONOMIC DISADVANTAGE AND INSURANCE TYPE WITH ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES IN UPPER TRACT UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA
    Moghaddam, Farshad Sheybaee
    Ghoreifi, Alireza
    Chun, Jessica
    Sobhani, Sina
    Udov, Andrew
    Nabhani, Jamal
    Djaladat, Hooman
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E1130 - E1130