Effects of driving style on takeover performance during automated driving: Under the influence of warning system factors

被引:3
|
作者
Zhang, Yaping [1 ]
Ma, Qianli [1 ]
Qu, Jianhong [1 ]
Zhou, Ronggang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Beihang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[2] Beihang Univ, Key Lab Complex Syst Anal Management & Decis, Minist Educ, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Automated driving; Drivers ' driving style; Takeover performance; Warning stage; Warning information; SITUATION AWARENESS; DRIVER TAKEOVER; TIME; REQUESTS; VEHICLE; BACK;
D O I
10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104229
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Driving style has been proposed to be a critical factor in automated driving. However, the role of driving style in the process of taking over during automated driving needs further investigation. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of driving style on takeover performance under the influence of warning system factors. In addition, this study also explored whether the impact of driving style on reaction time varies over time and the role of driving style on a comprehensive takeover quality indicator. Two driving simulation experiments with different takeover request (TOR) designs were conducted. In experiment 1, content warning information was provided in the TOR with different warning stage designs; in experiment 2, countdown warning information was provided in the TOR with different warning stage designs. Sixty-four participants (32 for experiment 1 and 32 for experiment 2) were classified into two groups based on their driving style (i.e., aggressive, or defensive) using the Chinese version of the Multidimensional Driving Style Inventory (the brief MDSI-C). The results suggested that drivers' driving style had significant effects on takeover performance, but the effects were influenced by warning system designs. Specifically, defensive participants performed better takeover performance, i.e., shorter reaction time and cautious vehicle control behaviors, than aggressive participants in most warning conditions. The content and countdown warning information and warning stage design affected the roles of driving style on takeover performance: 1) compared to the one-stage warning design, the two-stage warning design significantly shortened the reaction time of the participants with different driving styles, 2) compared to the countdown warning information design, the design of content warning information can shorten the reaction time of aggressive participants and lengthen the reaction time of defensive participants in the two-stage warning conditions, and 3) compared to the content warning information design, countdown warning information can improve the safe takeover performance of defensive participants. This study provides a better understanding of the role of driving style on takeover performance, and driving style should be considered when designing warning systems for autonomous vehicles.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Dataset on Takeover during Distracted L2 Automated Driving
    Hwang, Jiwoo
    Choi, Woohyeok
    Lee, Jungmin
    Kim, Woojoo
    Rhim, Jungwook
    Kim, Auk
    SCIENTIFIC DATA, 2025, 12 (01)
  • [42] Effects of collision warning system under different warning timing on driving speed and distanc
    Zhang Yuting
    Yan Xuedong
    Li Xiaomeng
    Xue Qingwan
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION AND SAFETY (ICTIS 2015), 2015, : 380 - 385
  • [43] Driving style classification method for lane change warning system
    Wang, Chang
    Fu, Rui
    Peng, Jin-Shuan
    Mao, Jin
    Wang, C. (wangchang0905@163.com), 1600, Science Press (14): : 187 - 193
  • [44] Effect of Takeover Request Time and Warning Modality on Trust in L3 Automated Driving
    Wu, Yu
    Yao, Xiaoyu
    Deng, Fenghui
    Yuan, Xiaofang
    HUMAN FACTORS, 2024,
  • [45] Influence of driver characteristics on driving comfort during highly automated driving
    Beggiato, Matthias
    Hartwich, Franziska
    Krems, Josef
    AT-AUTOMATISIERUNGSTECHNIK, 2017, 65 (07) : 512 - 521
  • [46] Drivers trust, acceptance, and takeover behaviors in fully automated vehicles: Effects of automated driving styles and driver's driving styles
    Ma, Zheng
    Zhang, Yiqi
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2021, 159
  • [47] Safety evaluation and prediction of takeover performance in automated driving considering drivers' cognitive load: A driving simulator study
    Liu, Yongjie
    Wu, Chaozhong
    Zhang, Hui
    Ding, Naikan
    Xiao, Yiying
    Zhang, Qi
    Tian, Kai
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2024, 103 : 35 - 52
  • [48] Takeover and non-driving related task performance in conditional automated driving: EEG and behavior Parameters interaction
    Gao, Yuan
    Rau, Pei-Luen Patrick
    APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2025, 123
  • [49] Driving under the influence ... "Of social factors"
    Arthur, Robert M.
    MISCELLANEA GEOGRAPHICA, 2015, 19 (03): : 56 - 62
  • [50] Measuring takeover performance in different driving scenarios: Considering the influence of non-driving-related tasks and takeover request lead time
    Gong, Jianguo
    Guo, Xiucheng
    Qi, Cong
    Liang, Xiaoxi
    Wang, Qiuhong
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2023, 97 : 411 - 421