Structural response of Helianthus solar sail during attitude maneuvers

被引:24
|
作者
Boni, Luisa [1 ]
Bassetto, Marco [1 ]
Niccolai, Lorenzo [1 ]
Mengali, Giovanni [1 ]
Quarta, Alessandro A. [1 ]
Circi, Christian [2 ]
Pellegrini, Rocco C. [3 ]
Cavallini, Enrico [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, Dept Civil & Ind Engn, Pisa, Italy
[2] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Astronaut Elect & Energy Engn, Rome, Italy
[3] Italian Space Agcy ASI, Rome, Italy
关键词
Helianthus mission; Solar sail structural analysis; Spacecraft mission design; WRINKLING ANALYSIS; MISSION; TECHNOLOGY; IKAROS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ast.2023.108152
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The Helianthus mission proposal is based on maintaining an artificial L1-type equilibrium point in the Sun-Earth gravitational field by means of a square solar sail, which should provide the required propulsive acceleration without any consumption of propellant. That vantage point would enable a scientific observation of the Sun and guarantee an effective monitoring of its activity, thus ensuring early warning in the event of catastrophic solar flares. Due to the intrinsic instability of artificial L1-type equilibrium points, the spacecraft dynamics is regulated by an advanced attitude control system based on electrochromic devices, which can adjust their optical properties through the application of a suitable electric voltage. In particular, a sliding mode controller has been recently proposed to commute the activation state of those devices by assuming that the solar sail (that is, the assembly of a large reflective membrane and its supporting booms) behaves like a perfectly rigid body. The aim of this work is to validate the predicted spacecraft dynamics by performing an accurate structural analysis of the solar sail under operating conditions through a numerical approach. In particular, a finite element method is used to evaluate the sail dynamic response to control torques in the context of some reorientation maneuvers.(c) 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Modeling of attitude dynamics for IKAROS solar sail demonstrator
    Institute of Space and Astronautical Sciences, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, 3-1-1, Yoshinodai, Chuo-Ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-5210, Japan
    不详
    不详
    Adv Astronaut Sci, (147-161):
  • [32] Attitude control: Solar Photon Thruster vs Plane Solar Sail
    Guerman, Anna D.
    Smirnov, Georgi
    ASTRODYNAMICS 2005, VOL 123, PTS 1-3, 2006, 123 : 2635 - +
  • [33] Attitude control of spinning solar sail with huge membrane
    Hanaoka, Fuminori
    Mori, Osamu
    Tsuda, Yuichi
    Funase, Ryu
    Kawaguchi, Jun'ichiro
    SPACEFLIGHT MECHANICS 2008, VOL 130, PTS 1 AND 2, 2008, 130 : 1765 - +
  • [34] Optimal Earth Gravity-Assist Maneuvers with an Electric Solar Wind Sail
    Niccolai, Lorenzo
    Bassetto, Marco
    Quarta, Alessandro A.
    Mengali, Giovanni
    AEROSPACE, 2022, 9 (11)
  • [35] Solar sail attitude control sensitivity to solar radiation pressure model accuracy
    Bladt, JJ
    Lawrence, DA
    Ward, LM
    Spaceflight Mechanics 2004, Vol 119, Pt 1-3, 2005, 119 : 2861 - 2874
  • [36] Classification of solar sail attitude dynamics with and without angular momentum
    Yuichi Tsuda
    Go Ono
    Yuya Mimasu
    Astrodynamics, 2019, 3 : 207 - 216
  • [37] ATTITUDE CONTROL OF SOLAR POWER SAIL-CRAFT "OKEANOS"
    Watanabe, Motoki
    Chujo, Toshihiro
    Mori, Osamu
    Sugawara, Yoshiki
    PROMOTE THE PROGRESS OF THE PACIFIC-BASIN REGION THROUGH SPACE INNOVATION, 2019, 166 : 177 - 190
  • [38] Modeling and Attitude Control for Solar Sail Based on Gimbal Boom
    Wu, L.
    Guo, Y.
    Yu, Z.
    Xu, Y.
    2015 5TH AUSTRALIAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (AUCC), 2015, : 283 - 287
  • [39] Classification of solar sail attitude dynamics with and without angular momentum
    Tsuda, Yuichi
    Ono, Go
    Mimasu, Yuya
    ASTRODYNAMICS, 2019, 3 (03) : 207 - 216
  • [40] Solar sail attitude control using shape variation of booms
    Feng ZHANG
    Shengping GONG
    Haoran GONG
    Hexi BAOYIN
    Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2022, 35 (10) : 326 - 336