Life cycle environmental impact assessment of natural gas distributed energy system

被引:2
|
作者
Wang, Yakun [1 ]
Ni, Ting [1 ,2 ]
He, Bing [3 ]
Xu, Jiuping [2 ]
机构
[1] Chengdu Univ Technol, Coll Environm & Civil Engn, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Chengdu 610059, Peoples R China
[3] Second Construct Corp Ltd, China Construct Bur 8, 191 Nanxinzhuang West Rd, Jinan 250024, Shandong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
POSTCOMBUSTION CARBON CAPTURE; POWER-SYSTEM; FUEL-CELL; OPTIMIZATION; COAL; METHODOLOGY; PERFORMANCE; ELECTRICITY; GENERATION; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-024-53495-1
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Natural gas distributed energy is recognized as a pivotal means to enhance energy efficiency and mitigate carbon dioxide emissions through localized energy cascading. Positioned as a key option for advancing the Sustainable Development Goals, this system optimizes energy utilization near end-users. While maximizing energy efficiency, it is imperative to address potential environmental challenges. A thorough, comprehensive environmental assessment, facilitated by the life cycle assessment method, proves instrumental in meeting this standard. Employing this method enables an intuitive grasp of the environmental strengths and weaknesses inherent in natural gas distributed energy within the power structure. This insight serves as a foundation for informed project decision-making, fostering the growth of the industry. We selected six environmental impact assessment categories based on the CML 2001 method, and conducted the life cycle analysis across four stages. China's inaugural natural gas distributed energy demonstration project was chosen as a model case, and an environmental impact assessment inventory was established, utilizing survey data and literature for comprehensive data collection and analysis. Results from case testing yield environmental impact assessment outcomes, with a specific sensitivity analysis for stages with notable environmental impact factors. The study underscores that the operation phase has the highest environmental impact, comprising 78.37% of the total combined environmental impact, followed by the fuel production phase. Comparative analyses with coal-fired and conventional natural gas power generation, based on dimensionless literature data, reveal that abiotic resources depletion potential is the primary contributor to the environmental impact of 1 kWh of electricity product, constituting 52.76% of the total impact value, followed by global warming potential. Concrete strategies have been outlined for decision-making in both the operational and planning phases of natural gas distributed energy projects. The strengthening of policies is pinpointed towards grid connection and scale expansion.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Life cycle energy analysis and environmental life cycle assessment of carbon nanofibers production
    Khanna, Vikas
    Bakshi, Bhavik R.
    Lee, L. James
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTRONICS & THE ENVIRONMENT, CONFERENCE RECORD, 2007, : 128 - +
  • [42] Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing of a SOFC system for distributed power generation
    Strazza, Carlo
    Del Borghi, Adriana
    Costamagna, Paola
    Gallo, Michela
    Brignole, Emma
    Girdinio, Paola
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 100 : 64 - 77
  • [43] The environmental global impact of the natural gas energy systems
    Dinca, C.
    Badea, A.
    Apostol, T.
    Lazaroiu, G.
    MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGES, BOOK 2, 2007, : 453 - 462
  • [44] Life cycle assessment of renewable energy alternatives for replacement of natural gas in building material industry
    Repele, Mara
    Bazbauers, Gatis
    INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES, CONECT 2014, 2015, 72 : 127 - 134
  • [45] Life Cycle Assessment of biogas production by monofermentation of energy crops and injection into the natural gas grid
    Jury, Colin
    Benetto, Enrico
    Koster, Daniel
    Schmitt, Bianca
    Welfring, Joelle
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2010, 34 (01): : 54 - 66
  • [46] Environmental impact assessment of water treatment integrated microalgae biodiesel life cycle system
    水处理集成微藻生物柴油生命周期系统环境影响评价
    Yuan, Xigang (yuanxg@tju.edu.cn), 1600, Materials China (39): : 34 - 41
  • [47] Environmental impact analysis of landfilling system in Irkutsk on basis of life cycle assessment method
    Starostina, V. Yu
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONSTRUCTION, ARCHITECTURE AND TECHNOSPHERE SAFETY (ICCATS 2018), 2018, 451
  • [48] Environmental impact analysis of biomass power generation system based on life cycle assessment
    Lin, Lin
    Zhao, Daiqing
    Li, Li
    Taiyangneng Xuebao/Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2008, 29 (05): : 618 - 623
  • [49] The environmental impact of activities after life: life cycle assessment of funerals
    Keijzer, Elisabeth
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (05): : 715 - 730
  • [50] The environmental impact of activities after life: life cycle assessment of funerals
    Elisabeth Keijzer
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2017, 22 : 715 - 730