Transport Pattern and Placement Characteristics of Proppant in Different Rough Fractures

被引:2
|
作者
Wang, Tianyu [1 ]
Zhong, Pengjun [1 ]
Li, Gensheng [1 ]
Sheng, Mao [1 ]
Wen, Haitao [1 ]
Tian, Shouceng [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr, Natl Key Lab Petr Resources & Engn, Beijing 102249, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Fracturing design; Proppant transport; Rough fracture; Smooth fracture; Two-phase flow model;
D O I
10.1007/s11242-023-01965-x
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The transport and placement characteristics of proppant in rough fracture is of great significance for optimizing fracturing parameters and making proppant transport to the deep part of fracture for effective support. This paper scans the surface morphology of rock samples after fracturing, generates rough fracture based on the scanned data, and uses high-order interpolation function to generate fracture with different roughness, and establishes a numerical model of proppant transport in different roughness based on Euler-Euler two-phase flow model. The effects of different fracture roughness, fluid velocity, proppant size, proppant density and carrying fluid viscosity on the transport pattern and placement characteristics of proppant were compared and analyzed. The results show that: (1) The complex spatial structure of rough fracture hinders the transport of proppant and makes the placement of proppant in fracture uneven, with the characteristics of tortuous and variable; Compared with smooth fracture, the equilibrium height of proppant in rough fracture is higher, and more settlement at the front end of fracture is easy to cause sand plugging; (2) Higher fluid velocity, smaller density and size are conducive to the transport of proppant in rough fracture, which is not easy to cause sand plugging, and can make proppant be carried to the deep part of fracture for effective support (3) Increasing the viscosity of carrying fluid and reducing the size of proppant can significantly improve the sand carrying performance of fluid, and smaller proppant size can better pass through branch fracture. Compared with changing other process parameters, changing the viscosity of carrying fluid and proppant size has more significant effect. But in the field fracturing process, increasing the viscosity of carrying fluid is easier to achieve, so in the hydraulic fracturing process design, the viscosity of carrying fluid should be considered first, and 70% of dimensionless equilibrium height in rough fracture should be used as the critical point to evaluate sand carrying efficiency. Exceeding 70% is easy to cause sand plugging. Optimize fracturing parameters. It is recommended that fluid velocity should be greater than 0.2 m/s, proppant size should be less than 0.32 mm, proppant density should be less than 2600 kg/m(3), and carrying fluid viscosity should be greater than 2 mPa s in field fracturing construction. (4) Proppant is placed in main fracture first in multi-cluster rough branch fracture, and then carried into branch fracture after reaching a certain height. It shows symmetrical distribution in branch fracture. It is suggested that smaller proppant size should be selected first in field fracturing construction process to enter branch fracture for effective support. The research results provide theoretical basis for realizing efficient filling of proppant in the deep part of fracture and optimizing fracturing parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 269
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of injection parameters on proppant transport in rough vertical fractures: An experimental analysis on visual models
    Huang, Hai
    Babadagli, Tayfun
    Li, Huazhou Andy
    Develi, Kayhan
    Wei, Gongjue
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 180 : 380 - 395
  • [22] Hydrocarbon recovery: Optimized CFD-DEM modeling of proppant transport in rough rock fractures
    Zhang, Bo
    Gamage, Ranjith Pathegama
    Zhang, Chengpeng
    Wanniarachchi, Ayal
    FUEL, 2022, 311
  • [23] Effect of Natural Fracture Characteristics on Proppant Transport and Placement in an Irregular, Nonplanar Fracture
    Qu, Hai
    Liu, Ying
    Zeng, Shunpeng
    Xiao, Hui
    Lu, Yu
    Liu, Zhonghua
    SPE JOURNAL, 2022, 27 (04): : 2208 - 2225
  • [24] Variable density proppant placement in CBM wells fractures
    Yang, Shang-Yu
    Yang, Xiu-Juan
    Yan, Xiang-Zhen
    Xu, Jian-Guo
    Fan, Heng
    Meitan Xuebao/Journal of the China Coal Society, 2014, 39 (12): : 2459 - 2465
  • [25] Numerical simulation of coated proppant transport and placement in hydraulic fractures based on CFD-DEM
    Ren, Lan
    Lin, Chen
    Zhao, Jinzhou
    Lin, Ran
    Wu, Jianjun
    Wu, Jianfa
    Hu, Zheyu
    PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 42 (22) : 3334 - 3354
  • [26] Numerical simulations of proppant deposition and transport characteristics in hydraulic fractures and fracture networks
    Wang, Xiaoyu
    Yao, Jun
    Gong, Liang
    Sun, Hai
    Yang, Yongfei
    Zhang, Lei
    Li, Yang
    Liu, Wenchao
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 183
  • [27] Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Proppant Placement in Hydraulic Fractures
    Shokir, E. M. El-M.
    Al-Quraishi, A. A.
    PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 27 (15) : 1690 - 1703
  • [28] Numerical Simulation on the Transport and Displacement Patterns of Proppant in Hydraulic Fractures Considering the Effect of Rough Fracture Surfaces
    Xiao, Bo
    Li, Hongzhu
    Wei, Chaoran
    Zhu, Weiyao
    Song, Tianru
    Yue, Ming
    PROCESSES, 2025, 13 (02)
  • [29] Numerical Modelling of Proppant Transport in Hydraulic Fractures
    Suri, Yatin
    Islam, Sheikh Zahidul
    Hossain, Mamdud
    FDMP-FLUID DYNAMICS & MATERIALS PROCESSING, 2020, 16 (02): : 297 - 337
  • [30] Numerical simulation of proppant transport in hydraulic fractures
    Roostaei, Morteza
    Nouri, Alireza
    Fattahpour, Vahidoddin
    Chan, Dave
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2018, 163 : 119 - 138